Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2009/May/Notdone

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


User:Aleksa Lukic[change source]

I have done lot of good things for Wikipedia on this language, whenever I seevandalism on recent contributions I react with adequate measures and I think that I am enough good user for this user privileges AleksA 16:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely not. Edit warring only 5 days ago, and I have to question some other edits the user has made that suggest they may be problematic with the rollback button. Majorly talk 16:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, that was no edit warning, that was indication to user to stop with undoing changes, in good intense to race up user who has insult me. --89.110.221.123 (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, that was no edit warning, that was indication to user to stop with undoing changes (without good reason), in good intense to race up user who has insult me ----AleksA 17:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, as per Majorly. (Yes, I know you declined it, just allowing the bot to archive it!. Goblin 17:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aleksa Lukic[change source]

I have done lot of good things for Wikipedia on this language, whenever I see vandalism on recent contributions I react with adequate measures and I think that I am enough good user for this user privileges AleksA 23:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Too many inappropriate contributions, etc. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
since I see that A.L. has raised a question about this on Juliancolton's talk page, I'll just add that I would have said no for the same reasons. Either way (talk) 23:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - I agree with Jc and Either way. Not now. Barras (talk) 09:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aleksa Lukic[change source]

I have done lot of good things for Wikipedia on this language, whenever I see vandalism on recent contributions I react with adequate measures and I think that I am enough good user for this user privileges AleksA 23:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Too many inappropriate contributions, etc. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
since I see that A.L. has raised a question about this on Juliancolton's talk page, I'll just add that I would have said no for the same reasons. Either way (talk) 23:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - I agree with Jc and Either way. Not now. Barras (talk) 09:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]