Argument from authority
 | The English used in this article or section may not be easy for everybody to understand. (June 2020) |
Argument from authority or appeal to authority is a form of argument or reasoning that argues if a person with authority in a field makes a statement about it, it is probably true. It could become a fallacy if it is misused.[1]
In informal reasoning,[2] the appeal to authority is an argument of the form:
- A is an authority on a particular topic
- A says something about that topic
- A is probably correct
The argument is good in some conditions. For example, a person says, "I need to take my medication because my doctor told me to."[3] Doctors are trained, know much about medication, and probably have experience giving medication before. The person is appealing to a real authority with supported data that makes the authority probably right.
The argument is bad when there is a false authority or unclear authority. For example, "I know X is true because it said so on the internet."[3] The complete internet has no authority because any person on the internet can say anything they want. A part of the internet may have authority, but it is unclear because the argument was not specific.
References[change | change source]
- ↑ "Logical Fallacies". Stanford.edu. Fall 2008. Retrieved 2014-01-25.
- ↑ Salmon, M.H. (2006). Introduction to critical reasoning. Mason, OH: Thomson Wadsworth. pp. 118–9.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Fallacies, Patrik Edblad in Logical (2018-11-30). "The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: How To Avoid Getting Fooled By Expert Opinion". Patrik Edblad. Archived from the original on 2020-06-20. Retrieved 2020-06-19.
