NPOV rewrite[change source]
I saw that the article was tagged for a lack of WP:NPOV. I rewrote it for quality and NPOV. If anyone thinks it is still NPOV, tell me why (or fix it yourself). If anyone thinks I fixed the POV, untag it. Trying to adhere to the four-eye principle. Staeiou (talk) 03:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Non-Governmental Censorship, Wikipedia[change source]
Perhaps it would be better for us to find some non-Wikipedia examples of non-government censorship. If non-government censorship is notable, it should be happening to someone other than us. Alchemist0405 (talk) 13:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Two concerns[change source]
A couple of things:
This article has been tagged for NPOV since April 2009, but without any explanation of why it is tagged for that. Nothing in the article strikes me as particularly POV. Thoughts?
Also, I have a problem with this sentence:
Pornography, especially child pornography, is censored in many countries because it is seen as not moral.
Child pornography is often banned as opposed to adult pornography not because of morality per se, but because of the dangers of involving children in the industry. Does anybody have any suggestions for rewording this? I'm thinking about splitting it into two sentences; talking about pornography itself being banned based on morality, and treating child pornography as a separate matter. Kansan (talk) 00:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)