Talk:Delma

No G11

This is neither intended to be nor is it actual advertising as it was claimed. The article is simply highlighting the facts and the history of the company to complete the list of companies in the town of Lengnau, Switzerland. Please highlight where changes should be applied. DrewLNG (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

• @DrewLNG: First of all the article is written like an advertisement and you have copied some words from its websites & last thing is it has no reliable sources. Add reliable sources if you can. Happy editing! MTKASH^{TALK Contribs} 22:06, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Please see the adaptions made and highlight where you think the citations are not sufficient as well as where it is written as an advertisement. Names, dates and facts of course had to be taken from the website but are confirmed by external sources.(DrewLNG (talk) 22:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC))

And no notability, either!

Notability is the prime requirement for inclusion. If Delma is notable, then almost any watch company is notable. Where is the originality? They're just making and selling watches with as much notability as a greengrocer selling potatoes. And the sources do amount to being advertisements. Apart from significant technical innovation, a company might claim to be the biggest with the highest turnover, or any other clear claim for notability. But not just "We exist, so we want to be on wikipedia". Encyclopedia Britannica would have had no takers if it had been full of companies listing their products. It's not useful for the purpose of an encyclopedia. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2018 (UTC)