Talk:Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

I miss anyone who shows the other side of this paradox.

You can simply prove that this paradox is wrong by reformulating the logical statements.

The hotel is fully booked and/or all room numbers have been assigned means: Number of visitors = Number of rooms = N.

The assignment of room numbers means: Visitor with number N has room number N.

Next to this we have the statement: N = infinite.

This paradox states that 2 infinities can't be equal; even after you create a logical statement that they are equal.

Any logical construct is equal to just putting the new visitor in room number N+1. ( After doing all the shifting we can just decide to exchange the visitors in the last rooms with the first ).

The only question is if you can disprove the fact that you can add a new visitor by only reading the first statements.

Else you could create an infinite number of false statements before the "infinity" statement that proves that all previous statements are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.171.237.121 (talk • contribs)

Vandalism[change source]

OMG please somebody fixe this superduperawesomebigness bad edits? 38.73.253.217 (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]