Talk:Johnny & Associates

Valid refs

I have cleaned up much of the scandal section to limit the sensationalism in favor of proven facts. There were musltiple issues where the supplied refs did not support what they were connected to. The section on the UN was totally unsupported. Nowhere in either reference did the UN admit a crime had occurred. While they were free with the term victims, they stayed to "alleged", "reported" and such. They never came out and said something happened. The jist of their points is that there was a lack of transparency in how the situation has been handled and that the media had remained silent for decided on the matter. The Quote in that section was just a paraphrase of the statement in the article, so I rewrote it to provide the info without putting words in their mouth which were not there. I also omitted the ethical quandary that certain people accepted the role as victim to forward their career. While many were forced, I noticed in the refs that there were more than a few who chose having sex so they could get the benefits of it. There were plenty of "willing victims" over the years.

The last bullet point has two refs. The first does not support the statement it is for so a new ref is needed. The second is a dead link so it is proving nothing. As both are on the inflammatory side, these either need attention or the statements should be removed. Pure Evil (talk) 04:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Remove them, and thanks for all you work! fr33kman 04:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)