User talk:75.73.3.230

Do not add a QD to an article that does not deserve it. Whether or not it is notable or not, unsourced or not and biased or not, these require appropriate tags rather than simply deleting the article in question. --Gwib^-(talk)- 17:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tell that to the 3000+ google hits the article gets. --Gwib^-(talk)- 17:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article on a European offshot of the Technocracy movement. It is entirely self-sourced, and appears to be the work exclusively of single purpose accounts associated with the movement. Google finds 57 unique hits - Tell that to the 6 active bloggers on a commercial website that make up net. Social movement ? Hardly.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Network_of_European_Technocrats Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network of European Technocrats - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia75.73.3.230 (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but your obviously biased views violently against this article will not lead to it's QD. We will hold a RfD and see what other users think. If you wish to vote in the RfD you must make an account, since IP votes have no effect on the outcome of a RfD. --Gwib^-(talk)- 05:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My view is not biased. It is objective. I have no interest other than that. Please refrain from wiki lawyering me. I am going strictly by the facts. No violence involved here except maybe intellectual. You did a faulty search in your google hits appraisal. It gets 3960 hits.

There's still only 61 unique hits. And a Google search without even looking at the results properly is not a way to determine notability. 75.73.3.230 (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above quote signed by me isn't me. Don't misquote me. --Gwib^-(talk)- 17:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some reason you are wiki lawyering me? Please stop and show a little friendliness to a sincere new comer. I signed my tag above to avoid confusion. That was an oversight about signing the above part above your post so why do not you cool down and smell the coffee ?

Here is exactly what you said.... I'm sorry, but your obviously biased views violently against this article will not lead to it's QD. We will hold a RfD and see what other users think. If you wish to vote in the RfD you must make an account, since IP votes have no effect on the outcome of a RfD. --Gwib -(talk)- 05:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This is what I said... My view is not biased. It is objective. I have no interest other than that. Please refrain from wiki lawyering me. I am going strictly by the facts. No violence involved here except maybe intellectual. You did a faulty search in your google hits appraisal. partial.. end quote. So now this should clear any misquoting up. 75.73.3.230 (talk) 20:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It did, and I know for a fact that this search gets almost 4000 google hits. Just click on one of the links I've sent you. You since you seem to love posting the same link over and over ([.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Network_of_European_Technocrats]), I don't and think that if someone isn't clever enough to click on a small link above showing that it gets 3900 hits, then they shouldn't be editing Wikipedia.

I don't know what wikilaywering is, but with regards to your "show a little friendliness", I think that you should try practicing what you preach. The first thing you did whilst here was to revert my changes to an article, add QD tags on it and post messages telling us to delete it here simply because En Wiki did.

I hate coffee and have no wish to smell it. There are less addicting, less harmful things one can drink or smell. --Gwib^-(talk)- 05:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe... but you have to admit.. the group is self sourced.. only deals in original research.. and the article was posted by the group itself in the form of their director. This violates some basic stuff... no one has written about them in any provable way.. and with the addition of the made up neologism (new words they made up)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms... which may not be at issue here.. but still. I assume notability issues are alike on any number of encyclopedia sites. Peace. 75.73.3.230 (talk) 06:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for a person who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. An IP address can be shared by many people. If you feel that things said here are not about you, you can create an account or log in to stop it happening again.