User talk:Mohammedbhaq

rfd[change source]

Hey, just a note aobut your recent rfd. You don't have to rfd any page you want deleted, there is a consensus that any page that meets a pre-picked criteria (see the list here) can be quickly deleted, which means you can press "qd" on Twinkle and select it, and the page can be deleted without a week of long tedious discussion. (anypage that doesn't meet this criteria must be decided on a case-by-case basis). In this case, it met criteria U1.

Hope this helps you to cleanup your userspace in the future :) Computer Fizz (talk) 21:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mohammedbhaq (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked because I understand what I did wrong to get blocked, I will not do the same thing that caused me to get blocked and I will make more useful edits instead. I will no longer make any more useless templates and irrelevant or unnecessary edits. I will not make sandboxes for other people either. I will stop making accounts to vandalise Wikipedia. I am sorry about this. I did not know that this would cause a problem. Please give me a second chance for me to understand.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for sockpuppetry. I see no reason to unblock. -- DJSasso (talk) 02:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator observation) Even if you may have "[made] useless templates and irrelevant or unnecessary edits", that was not why you were blocked. You were blocked for creating sock puppet accounts and using them to vandalize. Any comments on that? Computer Fizz (talk) 20:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]