User talk:Rsrikanth05

IEP 2.0 proposal[change source]

I regret that it was necessary to join you and others in disagreement with the IEP 2.0 proposal.

In my opinion, a better start-up plan was used in an SEWP pilot program in Japan. I mentioned it here, but two sentences may have been overlooked in the wall of words:

"... a very different kind of strategy has marked the development of a pilot SEWP program at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) here and here. Strategic planning and context-building here and here were quite distinct from the IEP 2.0 proposal."

I would have thought we want to find ways to build on what works well. --Horeki (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the late reply. I won't consider your actions regretful. Yes, IEP may have potential, but if it is worked out properly with proper community support. The IP team currently seem to want to do this whatever way so as to show that they have done something. Apart from this, they want to bring in too many students which isn't good. It's not a regretful action, but a wise one. Cheers, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]