User talk:Samaira89

Targeting my creations

Why are you targeting my work? They are all sourced adequately and clearly meet notability. Dotdashmeredith (talk) 04:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not targeting your work. Its just no references is added to your work. So you should create it with proper references added. Samaira89 (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is clearly references in my work.

But I'm assuming you're speaking about the @life.is.not.a.soup brand they own? If you check the Instagram page (instagram.com/life.is.not.a.soup) it's quite clearly under ownership of the company, and the page is cited in The NYT, Forbes, etc.

Do you think the section should be removed? That may be possible, if so I think you should remove your quick deletion request. I really don't like having the articles I spent time creating being removed for weak reasons. Dotdashmeredith (talk) 04:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just go through the articles you have used to cite in that page. They are not related to Poybo Media. And you are talking about Forbes n all nice. Samaira89 (talk) 04:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here are just three:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/special/contributor-content/2023/08/11/meet-the-16-year-old-minecraft-youtuber-building-a-growing-media-empirefront-headline/70574671007/

https://nl.mashable.com/entertainement/9316/minecraft-made-justin-jin-a-star-now-hes-a-media-mogul https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/meet-the-billion-view-digital-upstart-and-its-16-year-old-founder/ar-AA1fNMNa?ocid=finance-verthp-feeds

https://www.forbes.com.mx/patrocinado-justin-jin-magnate-de-los-medios-digitales-17-anos/

How can you miss that the articles are directly speaking about Poybo Media? Dotdashmeredith (talk) 04:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No issue all this admin will cross verify before deleting the page. Samaira89 (talk) 04:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can you even say that there are no references to the work? Why are you targeting this? Dotdashmeredith (talk) 04:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna keep my eye over this... I've searched on the enwiki page and I am not so sure about the article. I will remove the QD and use RfD instead. RiggedMint 05:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @RiggedMint Samaira89 (talk) 03:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just do what I do, which is cleanup and redlink fixing... RiggedMint 15:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not remove deletion requests from articles. If you think the article should be kept, you can comment on the discussion page. If the result of the discussion is to keep the article, the closing administrator will remove the deletion request. Thank you. RiggedMint 17:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent changes are vandalism and are not acceptable on any Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize, you may be blocked from changing pages on Wikipedia. Stop targeting my article creations without good reason. You also removed RfD nominations without good reason. You are targeting me. dotdashmeredith (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Samaira89. You have new messages at Vermont's talk page.
Message added 08:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MathXplore (talk) 08:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why am i blocked?

I am Samaira. I was doing good edits on wikipedia to stop vandalism. But there are few editors like @Cyber.Eyes.2005 and @Dotdashmeredith they make notables pages but they make bad promotional pages of their people in between to get unnoticed. They both are blocked on En wikipedia for sockpuppet reason, Just two days they got blocked on Simple wikipedia as well for Sock Puppet but with the help of some of their admin friends they started deadmin propaganda to threaten the admin @Fr33kman who blocked him. So with that fear that admin unblocked them and gave them chance. For sock puppet reason they should not given chance because they were doing promotional and bad edits from all their pages. Now i am trying to stop vandalism and monitoring them closely and trying to delete their promotional pages. They are getting proved and are getting deleted by admin @Macdonald-ross . Still they are doing many thing to block me. Due to Vandalism issue @Fehufanga blocked me. I don't know why because i was not doing any bad edits you can check my history neither i have made any bad pages. So please check this and unblock me. If for doing good edits and stop vandalizing is also against Wikipedia user policy . Because of some users whole Wikipedia is becoming of paid editors. And i will make sure i get justice because i am nowhere wrong. Furthermore if the same things arises i will nominate @Fehufanga for De-Adminship. And this nomination will be from well known admins of EN wikipedia. Because without verifying any reason how can someone get blocked. Samaira89 (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please list the pages you consider to be bad or promotional that I created? What you're doing now goes against Wikipedia:No personal attacks, which could lead to an indefinite block. Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Cyber.Eyes.2005 if i have done something wrong that hurted you. Samaira89 (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You, and many others such as @Simonsmichel, signed up to Simple Wikipedia after I began to mark articles for QD. Your first contributions were directed at my work, marking a number of my articles for QD, even The Mercury News, which is a 100% notable, huge American publication. It's clear you are just trying to get my work removed. dotdashmeredith (talk) 16:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Dotdashmeredith IF something i have done hurted you. But my intention was not to hurt you. Sorry, i am no where linked with anyone here i am new on wikipedia and this simple wikipedia is my first edits. By profession i am an engineer i was just tring to learn wikipedia editing. So i was not aware of all these. Not an issue i am blocked now for indefinite. Now someone like me cant disturb you still we can be in touch as a friend my insta is @btwits.samaira as a friend we can connect there. Thanks Regards-Samaira Samaira89 (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These disruptive users all feel like teacher's pets.... RiggedMint 16:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @RiggedMint if i have done something that hurted you. Samaira89 (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The way they write is rather similar as well... @Samaira89, the majority of your edits are directed at my work! Don't even try pretending you're not a sock puppet trying to play nice dotdashmeredith (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dotdashmeredith if you think i am sock puppet like you were why don’t you proof it with whatever account you are doubting just request admin to check whole even @Fehufanga is a paid admin i have talked to deadmin him very soon he will suffer without any proper investigation he blocked me without evidence he will see that not an issue. And i am not sock puppet and if i am i am challenging anyone to prove it because i know truth wins. Samaira89 (talk) 16:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already requested that yesterday, which is why you were blocked. dotdashmeredith (talk) 17:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I might add, you need proper evidence to request an RFdA. RiggedMint 17:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I followed your words but instead of instructing me you guys made be got blocked. No given me chance to learn and edit. Please help me if somebody can. Samaira89 (talk) 17:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Samaira89 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

@FehufangaSir, You have blocked my for the reason Abusing several article, and this thing was reported by @Dotdashmeredith Who himself is blocked on English Wikipedia for sock puppet reason and who was blocked on Simple English Wikipedia just two days ago for the same reason . He got last chance and got unblocked. He was creating many paid and promotional pages in between good pages so that no can identify it. i have closely monitoring him and putting deletion request so that admin can see and verify it from which many pages got verified and deleted by @Macdonald-rossAdmin sir like G/O Media and many more and poybo media and many pages having discussion going on. This user@Dotdashmeredith is trying to undelete that promotional pages and arguing that i am targeting him. So sir i was just trying to stop vandilism not deleting several article from bad edition. Please correct me and give me last chance. as everyone is getting last chance from past 3 days. Thankyou I shall be obliged to you for this. Samaira89 (talk) 10:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not talk about the reason for your block, or because it is not good enough for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must make the reviewing administrator(s) believe that

the block is not needed to stop damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer needed because you
1. understand why you were blocked,
2. will not continue damage or disrupt Wikipedia, and
3. will make helpful changes instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Ferien (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]