Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2010/Supervision

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. per consensus below. -Barras ^talk 18:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Supervision[change source]

Supervision (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

I-on/^talk/_book/^sand has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:

Its not needed here. Look it up in the dictionary. not an encyclopedia.

Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Weak delete Well, I don't see any big need for it to stay undeleted, but if you don't know what the page means, I can tell you the definition: it means somebody looking over the work that another person did. For instance, they say, "My homework needs some supervising before I give it to the teacher." I hope this helps. :) If you want, I can wikify and simplify the article more so it would become more useful. Belle ^{tête-à-tête} 00:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant by "I don't know what this page even means" is that I really don't know why its here. I reworded it. I really don't know why I worded it like that in the first place. I-on/^talk/_book/^sand 14:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. Sorry for misunderstanding... Okay, then, I'll change my vote to Delete. Belle ^{tête-à-tête} 02:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's written like a dictionary entry and not properly written for an encyclopedia MJ94 (talk) 16:56, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This currently is a dictionary definition, as pointed out above. As such it has no place in Wikipedia. I do not think there is much room for encyclopedic extension, so the article had better go the way of the dodo. Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 16:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I would have said soft redirect to Wiktionary, but as there is no entry there, delete.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 22:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Maybe some of its information can go into Wiktionary instead. —Classical Esther^talk 13:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close seven days after it was filed; that is on approx. Wednesday, 26 May 2010 at 11:27 pm, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.