Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Jamesofur

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship. Please do not modify it.

Crat endorsements, no opposition, closed as promoted. fr33kman 05:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Jamesofur

Jamesofur (talk · contribs)

End date: 05:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello; I would like to introduce Jamesofur, an administrator and checkuser here on Simple English Wikipedia. I believe his maturity and forward thinking ability will serve us well on RFx closures, crat chats, and I know that he has the technical know-how to conduct username requests and bot requests. I'd like to ask that we add him to the crat team. Thank you for your consideration, Jon@talk:~$ 04:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Candidate's acceptance: Sure whynot. I know I'm not the most active ON wiki often but I'm always around for help when needed and I know I can keep an eye on the given areas (Rfx's, usurp requests etc.) and am always available on IRC or email for poking. (though most of you know that already ;) ) James (T C) 05:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Support

1. No problems here. Another perfect candidate. Razorflame 05:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
2. Crat endorsement Jon@talk:~$ 05:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
3. Purplebackpack89 06:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
4. No problems here. Kansan (talk) 06:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
5. Crat endorsement -Barras (talk) 07:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
6. Maturity, knowledge and strong sense united makes Jamesofur obviously an excellent candidate for the job. —Clementina talk 12:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
7. Support - Simon^KSK 14:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
8. Support πr² (talk • changes) 18:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
9. Support Nothing controversial here. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 18:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
10. Go ahead —I-20the highway 18:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
11. Support Yep. Maybe I'm wrong here, but I was under the impression that because no crats have opposed we don't need to go into a full RFB...--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 00:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

    It should stay open for at least a couple of days, to let those who don't always have the chance to edit daily to bring up valid objections (if they have any). @Lauryn (parlez) 00:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

12. Support - Quickly, before this thing closes again. But in all seriousness, absolutely no concerns here. EhJJ^TALK 01:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
13. Support given  Hazard-SJ ^Talk 03:56, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.