Wikipedia talk:Non-free content

Pre notes

I started this proposal as an offshoot of the discussion on simple. Edits are welcome. NonvocalScream (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Imports

I'm using the base template from EN, because it is the simplest set of working lines I could find. NonvocalScream (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I've also added the rationale guides, and that could use simplification. The entire page is open for comments. NonvocalScream (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Well what you have written up is decent. However, I object to being able to upload photos. So I have to disagree with the policy as you have written it up. -Djsasso (talk) 15:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I disagree with the policy, as I also object to being able to upload photos. Oysterguitarist 16:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I've already said it: non-free content simply doesn't belong on a free encyclopedia, end of story. Majorly talk 16:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Status change

Taking the comments from the Simple talk, and the new comments this morning, it seems unlikly this proposition will ever be adopted. This is ok. My suggestion is someone right up a quick essay explaining how many times this was rejected, and the rationale behind what we currently do. So when this is suggested again, we can present the editor suggesting, with a nice essay as to why we do what we do. Very regardedly (sic), NonvocalScream (talk) 16:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)