Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2015/December/Notdone
User:Tulsi Bhagat[change source]
- Tulsi Bhagat (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)
- Hi IMHO, I've sufficient experience in fighting with vandalism as you can see my contribs. I'm a rollbacker & importer in maithili wikipedia (Verify). I am reverting vandalism using Twinkle gadget but sometimes it won't load due to slow internet connection. So that I think rollbacker right will help me alot in against vandalism. I've already read Wikipedia:Rollback feature. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Looking through your contributions, I see several edits where you claim to revert vandalism, but is actually not vandalism. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] . I will not grant the rollback right, but other reviewing administrators are free to decide otherwise. Chenzw Talk 08:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Chenzw: I think, you are right. But In my opinion, those edits by IPs are unnecessary, unhelpful. So that i think rather than changing sources of those articles it's better to revert. Reverting will save time and work becomes too easy and effective. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Not done Some things that need to be reverted are not vandalism. For example, in the 4th item that Chenzw listed, the editor added some information that was already there. That needed to be undone, but it wasn't vandalism. In the first one, you removed a reference: not only was the reference not vandalism, but I don't think it should have been removed. That all shows me that you don't know how to identify vandalism correctly all the time. So for now, I am declining your request. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Looking through your contributions, I see several edits where you claim to revert vandalism, but is actually not vandalism. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] . I will not grant the rollback right, but other reviewing administrators are free to decide otherwise. Chenzw Talk 08:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
User:Upaltez[change source]
- Upaltez (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)
- am a very active user on Simple Wikipedia and I warn users who vandalize pages with Twinkle. I want to have rollback rights on Simple Wikipedia. Thank you.
- Not done Based on multiple warnings from others (including myself) on your talk page about block notices, and your continuing those actions despite being told not to, I don't see an ability to understand our procedures. Only (talk) 12:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
User:Lolcats20[change source]
- Lolcats20 (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)
- hello, I would like to be a Rollbacker. I am very active on Simple Wikipedia, I remove vandalism and warn users who vandalise, I make lots of edits to pages and have made many pages. thank you for you time. I have read Wikipedia:rollback feature and know how and when to use it. Lolcats20 17:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done As of this posting you have only 103 edits, and most of them not related to vandalism. Your current level of editing here you can handle it all through Twinkle or other methods. In fact Twinkle will even help you with those delete requests, and warning users. I would suggest getting more editing and vandalism reverting under your belt first. Feel free to request this again when you get more of that experience. -- Enfcer (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)