Dinosaur renaissance

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dinosaur renaissance is a term coined in a 1975 issue of Scientific American by Robert Bakker to describe the renewed interest in paleontology. This has lasted from the 1970s to the present. It was caused by a great increase in dinosaur discoveries, and by new ideas of how they lived.

The "renaissance", a word which means "rebirth", changed how dinosaurs pictured both by professional illustrators, and in the public eye.

John Ostrom's 1964 discovery of Deinonychus is one of the most important fossil finds.[1] Deinonychus was an active predator that clearly killed its prey by leaping and slashing or stabbing with its "terrible claw". Evidence of a truly active lifestyle included long strings of tendons running along the tail, making it a stiff counterbalance for jumping and running. One conclusion was that at least some dinosaurs had a high metabolism, and so in some cases were warm-blooded. This was popularized by Ostrom's student Robert Bakker. The impression of dinosaurs as being slow, cold-blooded, small-brained reptiles needed to be rethought, at least for some of the carnivores.

Main issues[change | change source]

An 1897 painting of "Laelaps" (now Dryptosaurus) by Charles R. Knight

These are the main points:

  • Warm-bloodedness and activity levels. Robert Bakker argued that dinosaurs were warm-blooded and active animals, capable of sustained periods of high activity.[4][5][6] His methodology was fiercely debated among scientists.[7] Now it is thought that many dinosaurs had higher metabolic rates than living reptiles, but also that the situation is complex and varied.[8][9] Many dinosaurs could have had intermediate metabolic rates.[10] The discovery of feathers on dinobirds clinched the argument for the smaller theropods.[11]
  • Social behaviour of dinosaurs. Fossil tracks suggest that sauropod dinosaurs moved in structured herds, with the adults surrounding the juveniles in a protective ring.[4][12] Studies of dinosaur nests suggested that duckbilled dinosaur Maiasaura cared for its young.[13]
  • Dinosaur movement. The dinosaur renaissance changed their portrayal by artists. Bakker's illustration of Deinonychus is one of the most recognisable and iconic of dinosaur restorations.[14][15] Another result of modern fossil finds is the balance of bipedal dinosaurs. Dinosaurs, we now know, move with body almost horizontal, balanced over the hips by a long and often heavy tail. This tail is kept stiff by tough tendons running along the vertebrae. In many adult dinosaurs the tail tendons became ossified (partly bony), keeping the tail more rigid.
  • New extinction theories. The assumption that dinosaurs became extinct because they were inferior in competition with mammals is wrong. Iridium, a metal found mainly in meteorites, was found in the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary layer. Also the Chicxulub crater was found. This suggested the extinction had been caused by a meteor impact. Later, the existence of the Deccan Traps at the same time showed that enormous flood volcanism was also at work.
  • Cultural impact. The dinosaur renaissance revived the general interest in dinosaurs. A flood of books, films, television programmes and general publicity has followed. Jurassic Park is the best-known example of this.

Chinese lagerstätten[change | change source]

The discovery of new feathered dinosaurs in China has kept the field in the forefront of research and populat attention. Lower Cretaceous geological formations in the northeastern Chinese province of Liaoning are especially noteworthy. The animals found there are known as the Jehol biota.

References[change | change source]

  1. Dromaeosauridae
  2. Bakker, Robert T.; Galton, Peter M. (1974). "Dinosaur monophyly and a new class of vertebrates". Nature. 248 (5444): 168–172. Bibcode:1974Natur.248..168B. doi:10.1038/248168a0. S2CID 4220935.
  3. Novas, F.E. (1996). "Dinosaur monophyly". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 16 (4): 723–741. doi:10.1080/02724634.1996.10011361. JSTOR 4523770.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Bakker, R.T. (1968). "The superiority of dinosaurs". Discovery. 3 (2): 11–22.
  5. Bakker, R.T. (1987). "The return of the dancing dinosaurs". In Czerkas, S.J.; Olson, E.C. (eds.). Dinosaurs past and present, vol. I. University of Washington Press. ISBN 0-295-96541-X.
  6. Bakker, Robert T. (1972). "Anatomical and ecological evidence of endothermy in dinosaurs". Nature. 238 (5359): 81–85. Bibcode:1972Natur.238...81B. doi:10.1038/238081a0. S2CID 4176132.
  7. Thomas, R.D.K.; Olson, E.C. (1980). A cold look at the warm-blooded dinosaurs. Westview Press. ISBN 0-89158-464-1.
  8. Benton, M.J. (2005). "Were the dinosaurs warm-blooded or not?". Vertebrate Palaeontology (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 221–223. ISBN 0-632-05637-1.
  9. Paladino, Frank V.; O'Connor, Michael P.; Spotila, James R. (1990). "Metabolism of leatherback turtles, gigantothermy, and thermoregulation of dinosaurs". Nature. 344 (6269): 858–860. Bibcode:1990Natur.344..858P. doi:10.1038/344858a0. S2CID 4321764.
  10. Barrick, R.E.; Showers, W.J.; Fischer, A.G. (1996). "Comparison of thermoregulation of four ornithischian dinosaurs and a varanid lizard from the Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation: evidence from oxygen isotopes". PALAIOS. 11 (4): 295–305. doi:10.2307/3515240. JSTOR 3515240.
  11. Paul, G.S. (1988). Predatory dinosaurs of the world. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-61946-2.
  12. Bird, R.T. (1985). Bones for Barnum Brown. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press. ISBN 0-87565-007-4.
  13. Horner, John R.; Makela, Robert (1979). "Nest of juveniles provides evidence of family-structure among dinosaurs". Nature. 282 (5736): 296–298. Bibcode:1979Natur.282..296H. doi:10.1038/282296a0. S2CID 4370793.
  14. "Bakker's illustration". Archived from the original on 2009-02-28. Retrieved 2014-02-17.
  15. It is now known that the drawing is inaccurate in many respects, including the pubis being far too short, and the fact that feathers are lacking.