No Sources and Confusing Parts Etc.[change source]
The articles contains zero sources which is not good.
The "Goals of the Esperanto movement" is also slightly confusing and unnecessary. "The language" and "Grammar" are written similar to instruction manuals and are strangely structured. The "Technical Problems" is also too detailed. There should be a "History" section (similar to the one on the regular English Wikipedia). 22.214.171.124 (talk) 00:17, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
|This article contains a translation of Esperanto from cs.wikipedia. (4878951 et seq.)|
|This article contains a translation of Esperanto from cs.wikipedia. (5002322 et seq.)|