Talk:Joia Perry

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This article is suggested to be created/developed by the UN Human Rights in meta:WikiGap Challenge/List.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Haoreima (talkcontribs) 08:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for better word or phrase?[change source]

  • "anti-racism leader".--I am not sure that this is a good choice of words. 89.8.176.162 (talk) 08:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for informing. I will think about that replacement. If you have any good suggestions, please tell me! --Haoreima (talk) 08:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion to delete[change source]

(No explanation of how the subject possibly can be notable.)
The subject of the article does not look notable. Anyone has my support, in starting the process to have the article deleted.

Please, anyone, go to WP:AfD (if the subject of the article does not look notable to you). Thank you! 89.8.176.162 (talk) 08:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Her name is not mentioned on English-wiki, it seems. 89.8.176.162 (talk) 08:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Online search: The first half-dozen hits, makes me feel that this might be a red-flag case. 89.8.176.162 (talk) 08:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Too close to the subject? This version [1] makes me feel that the creator of the article, is maybe too close to the subject. 89.8.176.162 (talk) 08:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
There are two other language versions on Wikipedia - "Fiji Hindi" and हिन्दी.--If experts about crosswiki spam say that there seems to be no problem, then fine. 89.8.176.162 (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion is not cleanup in this specific case and I think right now you are assuming bad faith. However, there does seem to be some bias in phrases like "a fighter for justice." Perhaps this can be changed. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 15:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is no need for user:MrMe to assume (or think) that I am assuming bad faith.--It should be enough to read the part where I write "No explanation of how the subject possibly can be notable".--It seems that one user has accused [2] the start of this thread of being an attempt at WP:CANVAS.--This thread seems a long way away from Jimbo Wales' vision of Wikipedia; There seems to be bullying going on in this thread. Just because one can not say how an article is notable, then there is no need to bully the person who is saying that it looks like the article is about a non-notable person. 89.8.93.171 (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]