Talk:Pazyryk rug

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pazyryk rug article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Reversion 06:12, 26 June 2020‎[change source]

From the recent reversion of 06:12, 26 June 2020‎, what are the issues and components. My edit was made in good faith, as I assume Djasso's was. Maidyouneed (talk) 07:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete sourced content again. Thank you. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 21:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And don't add pro-Armenian (biased) fringe sources again. Thank you. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 21:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please point out which sourced content has been removed and which source is pro-Armenian fringe. You have mass reverted many changes. Please identify which changes you have issue with rather than blanket reverting. Maidyouneed (talk) 22:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This source Antike Orientteppiche p429 has had the quotation ""Die Annahme, daß aus dem ostturkestanischen Raum der Einfluß der Kunst den Weg nach Westen nahm, wird durch die Völkerwanderungen untermauert. " place up on it. However the immediately prefacing quote is in referenced to a 12th century AD. Is this relevant to the Pazyryk rug? Quote with context: "Ob die im Tarim - Becken geſundenen Teppichfragmente des 12. Jahrhunderts n.Chr . turkmenischen Einfluß hatten , ist fraglich . Die Annahme , daß aus dem ostturkestanischen .... " Maidyouneed (talk) 23:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the reference. If you remove basic sourced content again, I will have to report you because of non-good-faith editing and disruptive edit warring. This is your last warning. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the reference. I've added back in the reference quotation you had added. I hope this is acceptable. If you still have an issue with particular edits please raise them, rather than mass reverting many changes again. Maidyouneed (talk) 03:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Better than before, but I have to reword many things. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you both ended edit warring and decided to agree. You should both be aware of the edit warring policy for the future, though. IWI (chat) 13:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IWI Thanks for joining our discussion. @Maidyouneed I split the origins into two main sections. I also split Schurmann from Gantzhorn, because they do not refer to each other. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Maidyouneed: Why did you split the source for "Sakic funeral accessory"? If people want to know the source for this, they won't find it. Please fix it again. Thanks. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 13:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]