User talk:ImprovedWikiImprovment

Archives 2018 2019

Discussions that have been inactive for 3 days and bot messages get archived; please start a new section if the discussion you were looking for has been archived. It is currently approximatley 3:08 PM (update) where this user lives; this user is unlikely to be active between 1 AM and 9 AM.

About Peng Kang Hill station (simple English)

I beg to pardon. You said the article was a near carbon copy. Carbon copy of what? I will be frank. It's not a carbon copy. Allkayloh (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

The closest resemblance is the standard English version of the Peng Kang Hill station page. Allkayloh (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

@Allkayloh: My apologies; I made a mistake. IWI (chat) 00:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

@Only: (tps) As someone who had simplify a enwp train station article Sembawang MRT station, I will like to say that IWI tagging of A3 isn't too off. The sentences are really complex and currently, there isn't any work. It looks quite like the enwp article, so could you consider an A3. I can help to simplify, but the station itself lacks notabilty currently also, but not so close to A4. Can you advice us what to do, thanks. Just to note there isn't proper attribution also. --Cohaf (talk) 15:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

I don’t have time to look at this further today so you’re always welcome one to ask another admin to look at it. But I declined it because the user had been working on it over the course of 10-15 minutes and had just edited it 3 minutes prior to the QD tag. I think that my declining it to allow the user to continue to work on it was more than reasonable. Only (talk) 15:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

@Only:I understand your point but the user stop editing after that tag was slapped. I personally will wait for a little while longer, say 30 minutes or so. Thanks for your input and I think I'll QD it again. Regards, --Cohaf (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:February 2019 events

I saw your edit summary for the creation of this category. It now has three entries, so it's fine now, but two entries is too few for most categories. See Wikipedia:Categories#Is there a need for the new category? for the guideline on this. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

@Auntof6: Guidelines aren’t to die by. There were going to be more articles to add to it, obviously and that’s what I meant. Your intentions are good and I respect that. IWI (chat) 22:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)