Talk:Zinc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[change source]

This article was nominated for Very Good Article review. Feel free to comment there and/or list some helpful corrections here. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is how the article was before I started expanding it [1]. FYI Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since this article failed VGA, I have nominated it for GA. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was nominated for GA and the result was complete silence comments like normal a promotion! --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A few comments[change source]

  • Deficiency needs an article on the Simple English Witktionary.  Not done I do not have Internet access to wiktionary.  Done received temporary access and created it
  • Flotation should have an article here.  Done creating the article
  • Galvanizing is linked to this wiki in the lead, but is linked to the Wiktionary in the Uses section.  Done
  • Most of the sentences in the lead could be combined together.  Not done I don't want this to be too complicated. People might have a hard time grasping two thoughts in one sentence.  Done merged sentences whether complicated or not
  • It is also used in motorboats[20] and pipelines to slow rusting. Reference link should be at the end of the sentence.  Done
  • The preparation section could be expanded.  Done expanded a little and removed disambig link
  • The second reference, Some sources do not consider 70Zn to be radioactive. Who?  Done removed reference added by Eptalon
  • Reference thirty-four needs to be in {{citation}} or {{cite web}} format. Done

Albacore (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

what are you trying to say @Albacore? 64.4.104.2 (talk) 18:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reference problem[change source]

For the statement on the half life of the 64Zn isotope, the ref is listed as CEC 2006 pgs.. Problem is, there is no listing for a CRC anywhere in the article. I tried finding a ref to back up the claim but all I could find was >=7x10^20.. kind of vague and doesnt support 4.3x10^18. Other than that, repaired 2 refs. rest seem fine in form cant say anything about if the are still live though. Didnt check. --Creol(talk) 02:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]