User talk:AJona1992/Dreaming of You

Deletion

How is the article a copyvio? I didn't used the proper grammar and style that the English version had. AJona1992 (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

It's still a stupidly complex page that is basically copy and pasted from ENWP. Furthermore, Simple English does not mean that you should not use "proper grammar and style" - you should and, if anything, it's even more important. Article's a mess. Admins delete please. Goblin 18:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Juliancolton!

This PAGE IS WAY TOO GOOD TO BE DELETED! Why, the Wikipedia finally gets a big, large, interesting page that's over 80,000 bytes and they want to delete it?! Reverter (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Big and large isn't always a good thing - the page is completely inappropriate for this encyclopedia, and we also have many better articles. Go read up on how the wiki works. Goblin 18:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Gordonrox24!

It has good grammar but not prose. The article's structure is very different from the English version. Which was done the same (not by me) for the Slovenian Wikipedia. AJona1992 (talk) 18:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I know how a wiki works. I'm on Spongepedia & Wikipedia and now I'm here. Anyways, although your right, editing it is a better solution. Instead of destroying the article; just edit it and make it better. That's how we should solve the problem. Reverter (talk) 18:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Note I have read what Reverter had suggestion on my talk page that I just edit it and fix the problems that arise. I don't see a copy-vio with the article, just prose errors. The article is highly sourced with over 123 citations. I don't mind fixing it, but I need to know the issues first (besides the "copy-vio") AJona1992 (talk) 18:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

(e/c) Prose is just as important as grammar too. Still should be deleted, you've not said anything to stop it from being deleted at all thus far. Just because it's crap somewhere else, doesn't mean we want it here. Goblin 18:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor!

And exactly, I'm right, so we delete it. That was hard to decide, wasn't it? If you want to edit it to make it better, drop it down to basics, instead of a complex transwiki. Goblin 18:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Bsadowski1!

See above. ^ Goblin 18:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Bsadowski1!

Its a featured article candidate on the English Wikipedia. The Slovenian Wikipedia has it in their Wikipedia (equivalent of the English version) so its not "crap", esp, if the album sold more than 175,000 copies the first day beating out every singer in the world, only second to Michael Jackson, which includes a source. AJona1992 (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm with AJona1992 now. It's 2 against one. Anyway, he/she promised to fix it so give him/her a chance! Reverter (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm a guy, and it really doesn't matter if it's a "2-against-one", if the article is under violations it can be deleted. That's why I originally used a sandbox (see here) and as you can see (by the history) I wasn't just adding info I was fixing it so it can be suitable for Simple Wiki. AJona1992 (talk) 18:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

(comment was deleted by user)

Now, I didn't say we should give up, just be civil about the situation and not be like "well four of us say this so you have to do it!" - this will led us no where. If we come together with a solution then we can help shape what needs to be next. Sorry about that, AJona1992 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Okay. Well, I guess it'll be deleted...I tried. Reverter (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Anyway, this 22-minute long argument was fun! But I hope this never happens again. Reverter (talk) 18:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, the article's fixed and this article dispute is settled. Reverter (talk) 19:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I have fixed both the lead and production and development sections. However, I will finish off the rest later. If anybody wants to chip in, that'll be great! Thanks, AJona1992 (talk) 19:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

The article is a long, long, long way from being 'fixed', and I repeat my earlier comments to you. Furthermore, please don't try and turn this into a 'dispute' when it isn't - there's no dispute here at all, and I'm not quite sure why you're trying to resolve an apparent dispute on your first day, particularly when there isn't one (As I've said) and we both know what we're talking about (Myself and AJona, that is.). AJona, good work so far but it's still completely unsuitable for the mainspace and still should really be deleted as complex, if not transwiki. Whilst you're working on it it would make sense to move it into your userspace, simplify it completely there and then move it back - as it is, it shouldn't really be in the mainspace. Thanks, Goblin 21:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Chenzw!

I'd love to, but I know little information about Selena or the Dreaming of You album. Reverter (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)