User talk:Bluegoblin7/Archive 27

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

« 1

← Archive 26

Archive 27

39 »

T:TDYK

Hi, Bluegoblin7

You moved the article Tardigrade to Q4. T:TDYK says Hooks cannot be moved to a Queue or removed from the nominations page until they have been there for a minimum of three days. That hook had been there for less than a day. Is that rule set in stone? Albacore (talk · changes) 23:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's not set in stone and is more a guideline than anything. There's an update due in a couple of hours and without the hook (Which I reviewed myself before moving) it'd get delayed by three days. Hum. Gob lin 23:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor![reply]

DYK archive

Sorry about that. I did not realize it was formatted like that. I thought the picture was to be removed :( 74.109.217.103 (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, no harm done! Was my fault for not adding the colon earlier on when I made the archival, but yeah, we tend to link to the photo as it's nice for the reader to see what photos were used, if they read the archives that is! Gob lin 00:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Clementina![reply]

Message on GB3

Please check GB3's talk page for my problem. Loudclaw (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to notify me that you've left a message on a bot talk page, I get an email and have it watchlisted. Though it's completely the wrong place for that issue anyway, though I have replied. And please, use new sections when writing messages. Gob lin 12:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor![reply]

Service Award

This editor is a **Senior Editor I** and has the right to show this **Book of Knowledge**.

More than two years, and more than 13,000 edits...and you get a book. Congratulations, Peterdownunder (talk) 11:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I guess, though does this not completely defeat the point of them being self-given which I thought was the only reason why we all thought they were good ideas...? Gob lin 19:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor![reply]

Response

I haven't been spamming or MySpacing on here! I only just saw the warning on WP:ST and I disagree. I wasn't spamming. Loudclaw (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can disagree all you like but the definition of spam is unsolicited messages - every single time you post your template on a user's talk page who is not interested in your project you are spamming. Stop now. Consider this a final warning before I create the required block/ban topics. With regards to myspacing... Gob lin 14:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor![reply]

Wow! I just reverted an edit, and warned an IP! Nice. Loudclaw (talk) 00:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Myspacing. Despite the fact you just told me you didn't do it. Again, stop. Gob lin 14:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor![reply]

Oh, all right. I confess. Loudclaw (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

You nearly made a user leave Wikipedia because of your comments. Fortunately, he has returned and removed the thread. I'm considering this as a warning to you. The one and only...Mr. Berty! ^talk~_stalk 10:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC);[reply]

A warning for what? In my opinion as an outside observer, BG7's comments were not out of line. Just because Hydriz took them differently and reacted by leaving Wikipedia does not make the comments inappropriate. So, I'm not entirely sure what you are warning him for, and what makes it a valid warning. Either way (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not even going to bother replying to this... Gob lin 13:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Barras![reply]

Sorry

See User:Normandy. Sorry I didn't tell you on MSN/Email/Whatever. The problems I caused for you in the past with people thinking you and I worked in tandem were unfair on you. I decided this time I returned I would hide it from you, and everyone, to get a clean slate, a new start. Eventually I planned to reveal who I was once I was a member in good standing in the community, this way I wouldn't be blocked on sight and not be able to use my talk page (like last time). Oh well. P.S. I'm telling you this here as you are not online and I wanted to say to you first to give you a heads up. I also wanted to clarify my position before I cannot respond to any allegations. Normandie ^Talk! 13:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]