User talk:Chenzw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at

Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw.
User talk

Tech News: 2016-33[change source]

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks[change source]

Thanks for pointing out the attack names. All now suppressed.--Peterdownunder (talk) 00:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

< nowiki > ?[change source]

Uhh... do you mind if I remove the < nowiki > tag from that education section of the article about Arkansas? --Turkeybutt JC (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

I don't understand your question. The nowiki tag has already been removed (by me). Chenzw  Talk  14:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Oh, I see it now; looks like I missed one. Please feel free to remove it anytime you wish. Chenzw  Talk  14:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Is chewez-bot opensource?[change source]

Where can I submit pull requests?

What do you want to change? Chenzw  Talk  04:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Carmelo B. Pisani[change source]

I have to express such a deep dissappointment: it was a clear-cut totally unrealiable text added by someone who uses hundreds of sockpuppets at also. But the worst part was this: a long-term abuser sockpuppet were left free to insult and vote, without being reported for lock. Finally such a crappy text was left untouched, with such bright howlers like " the "Black shirt" (Camicie Nere) movement" or "Map of Malta in the XVI century, when Italian was declared the official language by the Knights of Malta" to illustrate a XX century historical fact. Finally the title: it was simply fictional: just a way to escape from watching list(s). --Vituzzu (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

I am sorry that the situation has come to this, but the deletion policy does not provide for deletion of such an article without having achieved consensus first. While I can't comment (and don't know a thing) about the sockpuppeting, I should note that the local community is largely unaware as well, and we need the guidance of other editors who are familiar with the situation and to point out and explain the problems. Had ForPisani's vote been struck out in the RFD, it is likely that there would still have been a consensus to keep the article. Chenzw  Talk  05:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-34[change source]

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-35[change source]

15:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)