User talk:Haruneme

Hello, Haruneme, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will show your username and the date.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! -- File:Eagle.svg.png Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are not authoritative[change source]

I now find the edit(s) to which you refer. Please read Wikipedia:Links to other websites for information about linking from articles. It is not the purpose of the wikipedias to be directories of links, nor to contain a link just as it may mention the subject. We are looking for authoritative links that are added for the quality that they add to an article. A blog generally would not be the sort of link that we would add to this sort of article. Billinghurst (talk) 12:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding the link. Billinghurst (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop playing a game, as my next move will be to have the link blacklisted. Your choice. Billinghurst (talk) 13:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are back and with your usual tricks. This domain has been added across all WMF wikis on 31 occasions, all by you. Conflict of interest and non-authoritative. I have added notes to my fellow stewards that the next time it appears, we are to blacklist the domain. You have had fair warning. Billinghurst (talk) 12:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[change source]

Hello, I'm Rus793. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Basilica Cistern, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see Wikipedia:Citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please be careful not to break text-source integrity. You changed a named reference that had two additional statements your new reference did not support thereby corrupting the article. In addition, there was no reason to change from a source with editorial control to a blog source with none. User:Rus793 (talk) 14:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]