Your recent changes are vandalism, and this shows that you want to harm Wikipedia. This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Razorflame06:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Once again, I have been blocked for absolutely no reason. After the liberal hacks on regular Wikipedia blocked me for giving facts, I thought that these people would have more brains to understand the truth. But, alas, they don't. This website has also been infiltrated by liberal hacks. My images were reasonable and real, and my edits were entirely truthful. There is no reason for this unjust block whatsoever. Please unblock me at once. Thank you.
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Another liberal hack screws me over again. Every time a liberal adds information, it's valid and true, even when it's uncited. Every time a conservative adds information, it is always "vandalism," even if there is a citation. I am adding the truth to these articles. The guy with Anderson Cooper is confirmed to be Julio Cesar Recio, who has been verified to be in a romantic relationship with Cooper. For crying out loud, they live in the same apartment. The picture of Al Gore is more up to date and thus more accurate, especially since it shows him doing something and not just standing there. Thus, my edits were not vandalism, but were done to improve Simple English Wikipedia. Sadly, though, it has been just as infiltrated as regular Wikipedia with political agendas. I pray that some reasonable, legitimate editor would review my request and unblock me, and indefinitely block any liberal hacks who are trying to screw up this website. Thank you, may God bless you, and may God bless America!
Decline reason:
Your edits are vandalism, and this is an encyclopedia; official portraits should be used whenever available, thank you. --ChenzwTalk06:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please see above reason. I am also requesting an indefinite block be placed on User:Razorflame. Thank you, may God bless you, and may God bless America!
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mr. Kruzkin. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mr. Kruzkin~simplewiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.