Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2024/July/Notdone

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:Cactusisme

Cactusisme (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

My second request for rollback. I feel like I got better in reverting vandalism since my previous request and would like rollback to improve efficiency. Thanks--Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 08:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain bug:special:redirect/logid/28011. MathXplore (talk) 06:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiBayer said that the pages that I translated were in Standard Indonesian not in Buginese. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 07:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide diff links for that statement. MathXplore (talk) 12:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 12:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here bug:Pembicaraan Pengguna:Cactusisme--Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 12:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a diff link, I was asking for links like bug:special:diff/203629. MathXplore (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt know Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 12:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So whats your opinion? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 23:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a borderline case. The edit count is good but Wikipedia:Rollback_feature#Getting_rollback says "If you have been blocked recently, it is unlikely that you will be given rollback.", and the recent case happened this month. Also, this is your 5th RFP this summer (Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback/Archives/2024/June/Notdone, Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Patroller/Archives/2024#c-Cactusisme-20240621074100-User:Cactusisme, m:Steward_requests/Permissions/2024-07#Cactusisme@bugwiki, and testwiki:Wikipedia:Requests/Permissions/Cactusisme), which may lead to w:WP:HATC concerns, and this may make the decision harder. I suggest efforts to unblock requests without RFPs, and please consider using m:SWViewer, which works like rollback. MathXplore (talk) 02:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need rollback to use SWViewer Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can also use w:User:BrandonXLF/Restorer.js. MathXplore (talk) 02:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per the reasons above, there is no action from my side, please wait feedback from other admins. MathXplore (talk) 02:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you need rollback one some wiki, not necessarily the wiki your using it on. @Cactusisme Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 03:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 12:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note: 1st request is archived here. MathXplore (talk) 06:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - I have concerns with the fact it does appear that you are trying to collect rights, along with 2 blocks on this account. I can not at this time approve this right. -- Enfcer (talk) 22:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:ToadetteEdit

ToadetteEdit (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Hi there! I would like to have the rollback rights to revert vandalism faster. I may not warn users often, and also having less than 100 edits, I understood all the risks with the tool. Furthermore, I also have this tool on enwp for almost 11 months. Thanks for reviewing my application. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Reviewing your edits, the main concern I have you already pointed to "I may not warn users often". This is something that should be done, unless it is a mass revert from a mass vandal, but with what I have seen, even the small reverts do not get any kind of comments, some of your older reverts did. I would like to see more reverts with more comments / warnings before granting the right. -- Enfcer (talk) 22:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.