# Special relativity

Special relativity (or the special theory of relativity) was developed and explained by Albert Einstein in 1905 because of some weaknesses that had been discovered in older physics. For example, older physics could not explain the constant speed of light.

Einstein believed that these physics theories gave unspoken preference to one group of observers (i.e., viewers) over another group of observers. Galileo had established the principle of relativity according to which physics events must look the same to all observers, and no observer can be said to have the "right" way to look at the things studied by physics. However, his equation did not hold for some phenomena such as the speed of light. According to Galileo, the measured speed of light should be different for different speeds of the observer and its source. However, the Michelson-Morley experiment showed that this is not true, at least not for all cases.

## Basics of special relativity

General relativity
$G_{\mu \nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu \nu}= {8\pi G\over c^4} T_{\mu \nu}$
Einstein field equations

Suppose that you are moving toward something that is moving toward you. If you measure its speed, it will seem to be moving faster than if you were not moving. Now suppose you are moving away from something that is moving toward you. If you measure its speed again, it will seem to be moving more slowly. This is the idea of "relative speed" – the speed of the object relative to you.

Before Albert Einstein, scientists were trying to measure the "relative speed" of light. They were doing this by measuring the speed of starlight reaching the Earth. They expected that if the Earth were moving toward a star, the light from that star should seem faster than if the Earth were moving away from that star. They noticed that no matter who performed the experiments, where they were performed, or what starlight they used, the measured speed of light in a vacuum was always the same.[1]

Einstein said this happens because there is something unexpected about length and duration. He thought that as the Earth moves through space, all measurable durations change (ever so slightly). Any clock used to measure some duration will give a duration off by exactly the right amount so that the speed of light remains the same. Mentally constructing a "light clock" allows us to better understand this remarkable fact for the case of a single light wave.

Also, Einstein said that as the Earth moves through space, all measurable lengths change (ever so slightly). Any device measuring length will give a length off by exactly the right amount so that the speed of light remains the same.

The most difficult thing to understand however is that events that appear to be simultaneous in one frame may not be simultaneous in another frame. This has several effects that are not intuitively obvious. Since the length of an object is the distance from head to tail at one simultaneous moment, it follows that if two observers disagree about what events are simultaneous then this will effect (sometimes dramatically) their measurements of the length of objects. Furthermore, if a line of clocks appear synchronized to a stationary observer and appear to be out of sync to that same observer after accelerating to a certain velocity then it follows that during the acceleration the clocks ran at different speeds. Some may even run backwards. This line of reasoning leads to general relativity.

Other scientists before Einstein had written about light seeming to go the same speed no matter how it was observed. What made Einstein's theory so revolutionary is that it considers the measurement of the speed of light to be constant by definition, in other words it is a law of nature. This has the remarkable implications that speed-related measurments, length and duration, change in order to accommodate this.

## The Lorentz transformations

The mathematical bases of special relativity are the Lorentz Transformations, which mathematically describe the views of space and time for two observers who are moving with respect to each other but are not experiencing acceleration.

To define the transformations we use a Cartesian coordinate system to mathematically describe the time and space of "events".
Each observer can describe an event as the position of something in space at a certain time, using coordinates (x,y,z,t).
The location of the event is defined in the first three coordinates (x,y,z) in relation to an arbitrary center (0,0,0) so that (3,3,3) is a diagonal going 3 units of distance (like meters or miles) out in each direction.
The time of the event is described with the fourth coordinate t in relation to an arbitrary (0) point in time in some unit of time (like seconds or hours or years).

Let there be an observer K who describes when events occur with a time coordinate t, and who describes where events occur with spatial coordinates x, y, and z. This is mathematically defining the first observer whose "point of view" will be our first reference.

Let us specify that the time of an event is given: by the time that it is observed t(observed) (say today, at 12 o'clock) minus the time that it took for the observation to reach us.

This can be calculated as the distance from the observer to the event d(observed) (say the event is on a star which is 1 light year away, so it takes the light 1 year to reach the observer) divided by c, the speed of light (several million miles per hour), which we define as being the same for all observers.
This is correct because distance, divided by speed gives the time it takes to go that distance at that speed (e.g. 30 miles divided by 10 mph: give us 3 hours, because if you go at 10 mph for 3 hours, you reach 30 miles). So we have:
$t = d/c$
This is mathematically defining what any "time" means for any observer.

Now with these definitions in place, let there be another observer K' who is

• moving along the x axis of K' at a rate of v,
• has a spatial coordinate system of x' , y' , and z' ,

where x' axis is coincident with the x axis, and with the y' and z' axes - "always being parallel" to the y and z axes.

This means that when K', the second observer, gives a location like (3,1,2), the x (which is 3 in this example) is the same place that K, the first observer would be talking about, but the 1 on the y axis or the 2 on the z axis are only parallel to some location on the K' observer's coordinate system. and

• where K and K' are coincident at t = t' = 0
This means that the coordinate (0,0,0,0) is the same event for both observers.
In other words, both observers have (at least) one time and location that both agree on, which is location and time zero.

The Lorentz Transformations then are

$t' = (t - vx/c^2)/ \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}$
$x' = (x - vt)/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}$
$y' = y$, and
$z' = z$.

## Mass, energy and momentum

In special relativity, the momentum p and the energy E of an object as a function of its rest mass m0 are

$p = \frac {m_0 v}{\sqrt{1 - \frac {v^2}{c^2}}}$

and

$E = \frac {m_0 c^2} {\sqrt{1 - \frac {v^2}{c^2}}}$.

A frequently made error (also in some books) is to rewrite these equation using a "relativistic mass" (in the direction of motion) of $m=\frac {m_0} {\sqrt{1 - \frac {v^2}{c^2}}}$. The fact why this is incorrect is that the light, for example, has no mass, but has energy. If we use this formula, the photon (particule of light) has a mass, which is according to experiments incorrect.

In special relativity, energy and momentum are related by the equation

$E^2 = p^2c^2 + m^2 c^4$.

## History

The need for special relativity arose from Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism, which were published in 1865. It was later found that they call for electromagnetic waves (such as light) to move at a constant speed (i.e., the speed of light).

To have James Clerk Maxwell's Equations be consistent with both astronomical observations,[1] and Newtonian physics[2] Maxwell proposed in 1877 that light travels through an ether which is everywhere in the universe.

In 1887, the famous Michelson-Morley experiment tried to detect the "ether wind" generated by the movement of the Earth.[3] The persistent null results of this experiment puzzled physicists, and called the ether theory into question.

In 1895, Lorentz and Fitzgerald noted that the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained by the ether wind contracting the experiment in the direction of motion of the ether. This effect is called the Lorentz contraction, and (without ether) is a consequence of special relativity.

In 1899, Lorentz first published the Lorentz Equations. Although this was not the first time they had been published, this was the first time that they were used as an explanation of the Michelson-Morley experiment's null result, since the Lorentz contraction is a result of them.

In 1900, Poincaré gave a famous speech in which he considered the possibility that some "new physics" was needed to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment.

In 1904, Lorentz showed that electrical and magnetic fields can be modified into each other through the Lorentz transformations.

In 1905, Einstein published his article introducing special relativity, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", in Annalen der Physik. In this article, he presented the postulates of relativity, derived the Lorentz transformations from them, and (unaware of Lorentz's 1904 article) also showed how the Lorentz Transformations affect electric and magnetic fields.

Later in 1905, Einstein published another article presenting E = mc2.

In 1908, Max Planck endorsed Einstein's theory and named it "relativity". In that same year, Minkowski gave a famous speech on Space and Time in which he showed that relativity is self-consistent and further developed the theory. These events forced the physics community to take relativity seriously. Relativity came to be more and more accepted after that.

In 1912 Einstein and Lorentz were nominated for the Nobel prize in physics due to their pioneering work on relativity. Unfortunately, relativity was so controversial then, and remainded controversial for such a long time that a Nobel prize was never awarded for it.

## Experimental confirmations

• The Michelson-Morley experiment, which failed to detect any difference in the speed of light based on the direction of the light's movement.
• Fizeau's experiment, in which the index of refraction for light in moving water cannot be made to be less than 1. The observed results are explained by the relativistic rule for adding velocities.
• The energy and momentum of light obey the equation E = pc. (In Newtonian physics, this is expected to be $E = \begin{matrix} \frac{1}{2} \end{matrix} pc$.)
• The transverse doppler effect, which is where the light emitted by a quickly moving object is red-shifted due to time dilation.
• The presence of muons created in the upper atmosphere at the surface of the Earth. The issue is that it takes much longer than the half-life of the muons to get down to the surface of the Earth even at nearly the speed of light. Their presence can be seen as either being due to time dilation (in our view) or length contraction of the distance to the surface of the Earth (in the muon's view).
• Particle accelerators cannot be constructed without accounting for relativistic physics.

## Notes

• [1] Observations of binary stars show that light takes the same amount of time to reach the Earth over the same distance for both stars in such systems. If the speed of light was constant with respect to its source, the light from the approaching star would arrive sooner than the light from the receding star. This would cause binary stars to appear to move in ways that violate Kepler's Laws, but this is not seen.
• [2] The second postulate of special relativity (that the speed of light is the same for all observers) contradicts Newtonian physics.
• [3] Since the Earth is constantly being accelerated as it orbits the Sun, the initial null result was not a concern. However, that did mean that a strong ether wind should have been present 6 months later, but none was observed.

## References

1. Light in different media may travel at different speeds.

## Other websites

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html