Trial by ordeal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ordeal by Fire by Dierec Bouts the Older

Trial by ordeal was a way to decide if someone is guilty or innocent of a crime. This was usually done by causing the accused person to do a task that was painful. If that task was completed without injury or if the injuries healed fast, this was usually taken as a sign of God, which meant that the accused was innocent. People believed that God would not allow the innocent to be harmed. He would therefore help them by doing a miracle. The practice has been shown to exist in polytheistic cultures as far back as the Code of Hammurabi and the Code of Ur-Nammu, and in animist tribal societies, such as the trial by ingestion of "red water" (calabar bean) in Sierra Leone. There the intended effect is magical rather than invocation of a deity's justice.

In pre-modern society, the ordeal typically was done together with the oath and witness accounts as the central means by which to reach a verdict. Indeed, the term ordeal itself, Old English ordǣl, has the meaning of "judgment, verdict" (German Urteil, Dutch oordeel), from Proto-Germanic *uzdailjam "that which is dealt out".

In Europe, ordeals commonly required an accused person to test himself or herself against fire or water. How this was done in detail, varied, and was different at different places and times. In England, ordeals were common under both the Anglo-Saxons and the Normans. Fire was the element typically used to test noble defendants, while water was more commonly used by lesser folk.

Priestly cooperation in trials by fire and water was forbidden by Pope Innocent III at the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215, and replaced by compurgation.[1] Trials by ordeal became more rare over the Late Middle Ages, often replaced by confessions extracted under torture, but the practice was discontinued only in the 16th century. Johannes Hartlieb in 1456 reports a popular superstition on how to identify a thief by an ordeal by ingestion practiced privately without judicial sanction.

References[change | change source]

  1. Vold, George B., Thomas J. Bernard, Jeffrey B. Snipes (2001). Theoretical Criminology. Oxford University Press.