Correlation does not always mean that one causes the other. In fact, it is very possible that there is a third factor involved.
Correlation usually has one of two directions. These are positive or negative. If it is positive, then the two sets go up together. If it is negative, then one goes up while the other goes down.
Explaining correlation[change | change source]
Strong and weak are words used to describe the strength of correlation. If there is strong correlation, then the points are all close together. If there is weak correlation, then the points are all spread apart. There are ways of making numbers show how strong the correlation is. These measurements are called correlation coefficients. The best known is the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, sometimes denoted by or its Greek equivalent . You put in data into a formula, and it gives you a number between -1 and 1. If the number is 1 or −1, then there is strong correlation. If the answer is 0, then there is no correlation. Another kind of correlation coefficient is Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
Correlation vs causation[change | change source]
Correlation does not always mean that one thing causes the other (causation), because there might be something else that is at play.
For example, on hot days people buy ice cream, and people also go to the beach where some are eaten by sharks. There is a correlation between ice cream sales and shark attacks (they both go up as the temperature goes up in this case). But just because ice cream sales go up does not mean ice cream sales cause (causation) more shark attacks or vice versa.
Because correlation does not imply causation, scientists, economists, etc. will test their theories by creating isolated environments where only one factor is changed (where this is possible). However, politicians, salesmen, news outlets and others often suggest that a particular correlation implies causation. This may be due to ignorance or a wish to persuade. Thus, a news report may attract attention by saying that people who consume a particular product more often have a particular health problem, implying a causation that could be actually due to something else.
Related pages[change | change source]
Notes and references[change | change source]
- "List of Probability and Statistics Symbols". Math Vault. 2020-04-26. Retrieved 2020-08-22.
- Even though it is called 'Pearson', it was first made by Francis Galton.
- Weisstein, Eric W. "Statistical Correlation". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2020-08-22.
- "Ice cream and shark attacks". Big Think. 2019-02-21. Retrieved 2020-08-22.
Further readings[change | change source]
- Cohen, J., Cohen P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. (3rd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Other websites[change | change source]
- Correlation Information – At StatisticalEngineering.com
- Statsoft Electronic Textbook Archived 2009-02-27 at the Wayback Machine
- Pearson's Correlation Coefficient – How to work it out it quickly
- Learning by Simulations – The spread of the correlation coefficient
- CorrMatr.c Archived 2007-12-04 at the Wayback Machine simple program for working out a correlation matrix
- Understanding Correlation – More beginner's information by a Hawaii professor