It is the most common type of polymorphism. It may be the result of sexual selection, that is, competition between members of the same species for reproduction. More generally, sexual dimorphism is inherited, which means the differences between males and females have survival value.
The features that distinguish the two sexes of a species are called secondary sex characteristics. They are not directly part of the reproductive system. They are the product of sexual selection for traits which give an individual an advantage over its rivals in survival and reproduction.
The difference between sexes can include:
- Size: Males in some species have harems ('ownership' of a group of females). In this case the males are usually larger than the females, e.g. gorillas, lions.
- Sometimes, one sex has additional features (used in courtship): antlers of deer, breasts of women,..
- Colouring: sexual dimorphism in butterflies is common. Batesian mimicry is often seen only on females, while the males have the typical colours of their type. This is the usual explanation: females, often carrying the precious cargo of eggs, get the most benefit from mimicry. Males, which need to be recognised by females before mating takes place, need to be seen for what they are.
The main functions of sexual dimorphism are to improve the individual's chance of mating in various ways:
- Mate selection. In this case, usually the males display, and the females select.
- Territory defence. Males may signal to other males that they 'own' an area.
- Fighting. If males carry weapons, they may use them to fight for mates. Weapons and size are multi-functional: they are used for defence against predators as well as against other males of their species.
Some animals show these differences only during mating season. Deer shed their antlers and peacocks shed their tails out of season. This minimises the key disadvantage of sexual dimorphism, which is, it makes the male much easier to be seen by predators.
References[change | change source]
- Andersson, Malte B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00057-2
- Ruxton G.D; Sherratt T.N. and Speed M.P. 2004. Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals & mimicry. Oxford. p156 10.5.3 Why is Batesian mimicry often limited to one sex? "Experimental evidence is widespread that males and females of the same species may experience different selective pressures with respect to predation". [slightly edited]
- Bonduriansky, Russell 2007. The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. The American Naturalist 169 (1): 9–19.