Talk:Philippine Institute of Chemical Engineers
Untitled section[change source]
Seems not outright spammy, there are similiar entries on enwp like en:Nigerian_Society_of_Chemical_Engineers / en:Thai Institute of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry etc.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- However, the creator has created several other pages on this with different names. The creator is clearly just trying to advertise. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 13:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well for articles, we tend not to care who is the creator / what their motives is. We tend to care about the content usually. I think this editon is less spammy than the rest, shall we give them some benefit of doubt like they are learning how to create a page. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really think obvious advertising appears as much here, but I would say A4 definitely applies. They do not claim to be notable. I wouldn't say being an organisation for chemical engineers is a claim to notability. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 13:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Then well tag per A4 I think, but I think there seems to be claim as the only professional society in a nation. Not sure. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sending it to RfD sounds appropriate to me. Belwine is correct that the initial articles (now deleted) were very much obvious advertising, but this one doesn’t appear to fit that description. --IWI (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I originally nominated this page for Rfd, then the author blanked, so it got deleted for G7. However, the page was recreated, so I'll just leave this one for RfD. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 13:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think RFD will be suitable. I also agree the previous versions are more spammy (seeing the page creation log I sort of guessed) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Then well tag per A4 I think, but I think there seems to be claim as the only professional society in a nation. Not sure. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really think obvious advertising appears as much here, but I would say A4 definitely applies. They do not claim to be notable. I wouldn't say being an organisation for chemical engineers is a claim to notability. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 13:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well for articles, we tend not to care who is the creator / what their motives is. We tend to care about the content usually. I think this editon is less spammy than the rest, shall we give them some benefit of doubt like they are learning how to create a page. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Not to be deleted[change source]
This is for information purposes to PIChE members. Ajubilo.rm (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- That's not what Wikipedia is for. If you are interested in giving information to your members, or members to be, please use a website or social network --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 15:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)