User talk:Ferien

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Belwine)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hello. Please leave feedback and questions here. Remember to sign with ~~~~ and indent your replies using a : for each reply. Thanks!
(Sections that have had no chat for 3 days get archived.)

Information
Babel user information
en-N This user has a native understanding of English.
simple-5 This user has professional knowledge of Simple English.
de-2 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf fortgeschrittenem Niveau.
es-1 Este usuario tiene un conocimiento básico del español.
no-1 Denne brukeren har grunnleggende kjennskap til norsk (bokmål).
nl-0 Deze gebruiker heeft geen kennis van het Nederlands (of begrijpt het met grote moeite).
fr-0 Cet utilisateur n’a aucune connaissance en français (ou le comprend avec de grandes difficultés).
Users by language
Crystal Clear app clock.svg It is about 6:10 PM where this user lives.[Purge]
vn-143 This user's talk page has been vandalized 143 times.

Palace of Westminster, London - Feb 2007.jpg


Please remember to sign when you leave messages[change source]

Information.svg Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Just in case you didn't know, when you post messages on talkpages and Wikipedia pages, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ("~~~~") at the end of your message. You can also click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png), located in the edit toolbar, which is above the change window. This will put a signature containing your user name or IP address and the time you posted the message. This information is useful because other users will be able to tell who said what, and when. Pages that may require a signature, such as User talk:45.116.232.31, User talk:185.186.235.1, User talk:169.204.191.6. Thank you for your participation. --Cewbot (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enioluwa Adeoluwa[change source]

Hello. You deleted this article without discussion, and there's no note on my user talk page. There were sources and Enioluwa Adeoluwa has notability in Nigeria for celebrity interviews as well as being widely reported as a redefining masculinity. This is one of the suggested articles in meta:Write for the Rights Nigeria/Article list.

Could you restore the article please and if you feel this is not enough, we can discuss the deletion as it does not appear very obvious. --Anstil (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anstil. I deleted the page under the QD A4 criteria, the subject of the article did not claim notability in the article. However, the article can be recreated if notability is claimed. If you want the page you created sent to you (via email) to work on further before you publish it again, just let me know. And if you feel that notability was claimed, please go to Wikipedia:Deletion review for another administrator to review. Thanks. --Ferien (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
QD based on Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#A4 and what is stated at WP:GNG, does not apply if there are secondary sources with significant coverage. These existed in the article before the deletion. It would be simpler to follow the process for having a deletion discussion, rather than having to overturn a deletion. As this is a planned article in the Write for the Rights Nigeria competition, because of Adeoluwa's significant level of public impact on LGBTQ culture in Nigeria, could we follow that simpler and more positive process instead please? Thanks --Anstil (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anstil, I've restored the article and created a request for deletion. --Ferien (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection request[change source]

Hello.

Can you temporarily protect the articles Flag, Tricolour, Doner kebab, Yogurt, Country, Baklava, Republic of Artsakh, Kadaif, Azerbaijan, Shambali and Dolma because the IPs 212.108.146.62 and 185.135.96.2 are constantly POV pushing?

I suspect that 212.108.146.62 and 185.135.96.2 are the same person, because the POV pushing is in the same pattern in the same and related articles. The IP has a history of POV pushing and edit warring with other IP users and also administrators/rollbackers. Please check the log and POV edits of this user, and temporarily protect the articles this IP has POV edited on.

The articles Flag, Tricolour and Dolma were temporarily protected until August 7, but has been vandalized again by the same IP. Can you temporarily protect all these articles again?

This IP starts erasing sourced information, POV pushing and edit warring again, once the temporary protections end.

This is the third time I put a protection request in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, but no action is being taken.

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Multituberculata. I have protected the Shambali article for 4 days. I haven't protected any of the other articles because, in my opinion, they don't have enough vandalism for protection. I've also blocked 212.108.146.62 as an open proxy. Regards, Ferien (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. However, 185.135.96.2 who is likely the same person as 212.108.146.62, will very likely strike again in the aformentioned articles, today or tomorrow or a bit later. When that happens, what is the next step? Multituberculata (talk) 15:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello.
The IP 212.108.146.62 (likely the same person as 185.135.96.2) is striking again and again in the same articles and also in other articles. User:Etoza has reported this IP in Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress for Block evasion, as I did before about this IP's vandalism. The IP will not stop with his/her disruptive edits and behavior. The most recent articles he vandalized on 23 September are Israel, Baklava, Pita, Republic of Artsakh, Kadaif and Dolma. The other articles he vandalizes with POV pushing: Flag, Tricolour, Doner kebab, Yogurt, Country, Azerbaijan, and Shambali, will very likely follow.
Nothing will stop and deter this IP, unless these articles and the IP are temporarily blocked for a much longer period.
Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The IP Etoza reported had already stopped when you messaged me. --Ferien (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This IP will attack again. Shouldn't these articles, and indeed any article not be temporarily protected from attacks? Even your talk page is being constantly attacked by different IPs. If they are not stopped and proscribed, they will become emboldened, as this IP's behavior in those articles, and other malevolent IPs behavior in other articles show. Multituberculata (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Multituberculata, protection is actually not used as much here as other wikis. It is usually used when people aren't able to keep up with the amount of vandalism being put on pages. As for my talk page, I would prefer it not to be protected at this time. It makes it more difficult for IP users to contact me and even if I had a separate IP talk page, it would make it more difficult for me to track messages on that page. --Ferien (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mail[change source]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Ferien. Check your email – you have got mail!
You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Haoreima (talk) 07:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien: Ich habe dir per Mail geantwortet. bitte sehen. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 10:08, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[change source]

Hello dear @Ferien i have a question about a right, in my case of experience can i be trusted with 'Rollback' ?, Thank you 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sakura emad! I think you should get a bit experience before having rollback, maybe a month or so of editing before I consider granting the rollback right, so you can get to know more about editing here, and what's different from other wikis. Thanks for your contributions so far! --Ferien (talk) 21:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
checkY Good, i try to be better thank you again. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 21:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion[change source]

Hi Ferien, hope you are well. I just noticed that this user is vandalising their own talk page, and has submitted a phoney unblock request, but they aren't blocked. Is this a sock of some other vandal? Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC) NO, I was block on the regular one. 204.184.47.161 (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They seem to be blocked on enwiki, and I blocked a similar IP for vandalism the other day. Ferien (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2021-38[change source]

18:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am new wikipedian, i want to create the page Dc Themmie can i?[change source]

Hello i am @Gimmelover (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC), when i was checking the recent articles deleted on the wikipedia by you and other admins i found that Dc Themmie was deleted, and i have reliable source of creating the page i mean i have secondary source to make it notable for wikipedia. but there was a tag on it that only autoconfirmed can create it, pls can i,i have secondary sources thanksGimmelover (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC) Pls Gimmelover (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. That page was already deleted. Derpdart56 (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hello, Gimmelover, me again, as multiple editors have told you, DC Themmie is not notable for Wikipedia. The page has been salted because it was recreated and deleted too many times. Cheers Hockeycatcat (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gimmelover. As the others have said above, there was a consensus at requests for deletion to delete the page so please don't recreate it. You are free to start a discussion at deletion review if you believe DC Themmie now meets our notability requirements. Regards, Ferien (talk) 17:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tool?[change source]

Hi Ferien, you blocked 196.170.61.110, that's fine. I'm wondering where the rationale "blocked p2p proxy|ip=196.170.61.110|isp=ADSL PPPoE POOL BNG}} API-confirmed P2P VPN)" comes from. ipcheck.toolforge.org doesn't give sufficient info. Is there a tool I don't know yet that I could probably use on Commons? Regards, Achim55 (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Achim55. If you take a look at en:Special:Contributions/196.170.61.110, it has been confirmed a P2P VPN by the ST47ProxyBot. I find that IPs blocked by this bot are also usually blocked globally by a steward relatively soon after, so I would say it's quite a reliable way of finding out whether an IP is a VPN or proxy. Regards, Ferien (talk) 18:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I didn't know of that bot and will check against it in the future. Cheers, Achim55 (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to sister sites from simple[change source]

For some weird overkill, when I try to link to a project in regular English (except Wiktionary), I'm out of luck. So b:en: rather just takes me to the incubator and same with voy, s, q, n, v, and so on. Any way to fix this issue? Thanks! SHB2000 (talk) 06:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SHB2000, try en:voy: instead of voy:en:. q:en: and b:en: should still take you to English Wikiquote and Wikibooks respectively because a long time ago, there was a Simple English Wikiquote and Wikibooks, but there has never been a Simple Wikisource, Wikivoyage etc. --Ferien (talk) 15:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That seemed to work SHB2000 (talk) 22:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images[change source]

Hi Ferien, the disgusting images that you Oversighted are still visible here. Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed they were.. I've now RevDelled the other revisions where those images appeared. --Ferien (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, my friend! Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 15:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Hockeycatcat: I agree that those images are being used in a very inappropriate way. However, Wikipedia is not censored and they would be appropriate in the right context, so could we maybe not call them disgusting? --Auntof6 (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: I do understand that, I did mean that they were being used inappropriately. It was just shocking to suddenly see it pop up on my talk! Hockeycatcat (talk) 04:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User issue[change source]

Hi Ferien, could you please block 49.144.1.0 because they are removing important blue links from articles every day. Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE - All taken care of! Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some cookies for you![change source]

Somebody has given you some cookies! Now enjoy them!

Hockeycatcat (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yum, I really love cookies. Thank you! :) --Ferien (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(google translate) lecker! SHB2000 (talk) 13:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @SHB2000: I don't understand, what do you mean by that? May I know? Haoreima (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Haoreima: Lecker means delicious in German. --Ferien (talk) 16:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know the German meaning. But when he says "Google Translate lecker", I was really confused. :) :-) Haoreima (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Haoreima, oh, I assume SHB2000 doesn't know German so he's just used Google Translate. Ferien (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I can't really speak any languages apart from French and English plus a little bit of Italian as part of my musical knowledge. And don't mind that na-1 bit on my userpage. I don't think anyone apart from Ferien and one other user (7elteven) would understand why that's there ;-) SHB2000 (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Requesting permission[change source]

Hello dear @Ferien i have a question it is related to another wiki however i am just asking about your experience, if we have enough patrollers to patrol the pages,so an admin can refuse someone's Request to be a patrol due to Enough or not Enough numbers of patrollers? 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 12:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Unlike on other wikis, generally, you would need to have a really large amount of articles created (even more than how much someone who's a good regular content creator like Haoreima would have created). I'd say too much that the backlog is too much. Probably the rate of articles that TDKR Chicago 101 would be creating.
In my opinion, I'd have wished that autopatrol was a different right to patrol, where patrol doesn't mark your own articles as patrolled. SHB2000 (talk) 13:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000: There was actually a discussion about this a few months ago. See Wikipedia:Simple talk/Archive 134#Patrolling new pages. --Ferien (talk) 14:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @SHB2000: How can you say I am good regular creator? Yes, I am regular but not good enough till now! I am still learning from many wiki-people including you! :) :-) Haoreima (talk) 14:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
you have created about 600 articles though. SHB2000 (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @SHB2000: Somebody at the rate of TDKR would be impossible. He's created about a 5th of this wiki's articles. If you see, Darkfrog24 has patroller, though at a much lower rate, about 5 times of mine. Also please note Simple Wiki has a really small number of good editors, most of which are busy undoing vandalism and trying to help occasionally... that being said, @Haoreima is a regular editor, but he has a lot to learn, especially about sourcing and notability.
Again, the main purpose is Wikipedia is to build an encyclopedia, not get enough patrollers.
~~ 💠Ely - Talk💠 15:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SHB2000 Yes, Elytrian is right. And as I am not good enough till now, I need to learn a lot, even from you. I am a learner as well as a practitioner, trying to develop wiki better. Any good suggestions are always welcomed. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 16:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Lack of experience" is a self-solving problem. If Haoreima remains interested in working on Simple, Haoreima will be a patroller on Simple just by continuing on their current path. Darkfrog24 (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You'll eventually get patroller, given that only 1% of your articles have had issues. But as time goes, you'd eventually get patroller status and learn all the policies. Although I didn't realise that Darkfrog24 was a patroller though, and it also seems like Jeff G. is also a patroller too. SHB2000 (talk) 04:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000: I will try to patrol more here.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody at the rate of TDKR would be impossible. He's created about a 5th of this wiki's articles okay, so I've clearly underestimated how much articles TDKR Chicago 101 has created and didn't realise that they have about 161k edits. That is quite a lot. SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RFR[change source]

I requested a permission, specifically rollback, but it was ignored. Could you take a look at it? For others an admin answered within a day... 💠Ely - Talk💠 16:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elytrian, I'll take a look at it. Just so you know if you request for a permission, if your request isn't answered within a few days, an admin isn't ignoring it. They may be waiting to see if another admin comments, or to see what other changes you may make etc. Ferien (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-39[change source]

Tech News: 2021-39[change source]

22:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Yr[change source]

Ambox deletion.png

The page you wrote, Yr, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Derpdart56 (talk) 16:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez...[change source]

What's with this LTA adding obscene photos? Derpdart56 (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I don't know... Vandals can be strange. --Ferien (talk) 16:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping me clean it up. Derpdart56 (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, happy to help :) --Ferien (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Which script is that? Is it a type of emojis? Haoreima (talk) 17:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferien, he's back Derpdart56 (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Derpdart56: Blocked again.
Looks like using that emoticon wasn't the best idea... @Haoreima: I'm not using a script, and it's not an emoji. If you just search "shrug emoticon", that will come up. --Ferien (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't GRP, right? It has to be someone else... Derpdart56 (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not GRP. --Ferien (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Derpdart56 (talk) 18:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, WP:DENY still applies, so we should try not to give them too much attention. Derpdart56 (talk) 18:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

King of Kings Album moved[change source]

Hi. I just noticed that a recent RfD topic that you closed was renamed to Kings_of_Kings_Album. Can that one be speedily deleted or does it need to go through the RfD process a second time? I also note that the person who moved it, User:BrightjY, was soon after the move globally blocked. His last edit before the global blocking was to rename the page. Blissyu2 (talk) 13:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've deleted the page (it was eligible for G4 deletion) and closed the RfD. --Ferien (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar![change source]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I don't know how to give barnstars! Derpdart56 (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Derpdart56! :) --Ferien (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, you've done a lot to help combat recent LTAs and stuff. Derpdart56 (talk) 15:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xavier 500.30.10 might be UnknownEditor1234567890[change source]

Hi.

I just noticed that Xavier 500.30.10 changed UnknownEditor123467890's talk page [8] to remove the warning about Mohammad Shanooj

I wonder if they are sockpuppets? Blissyu2 (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blissyu2, I've blocked for block/lock evasion. --Ferien (talk) 12:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I also noticed that Xavier 500.30.10 seems to have recreated Mohammad Shanooj's page twice after being deleted. I wonder if he might create more sockpuppets soon. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hence why I reported the account to ANV. But I think this is the fourth time that page has been deleted (also under Mohammad Shanooj (singer) and there must be one more page that I'm missing. Seems protection is the only way. SHB2000 (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
also, it seems now the seventh, not the fourth only under Mohammad Shanooj SHB2000 (talk) 14:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2021-40[change source]

16:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Movement Charter/Drafting Committee/Election translation[change source]

Hallo Ferien,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch bei Meta registriert hast.

Die Seite Movement Charter/Drafting Committee/Election translation ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:


Frist zur Übersetzung der Seite: 2021-10-08.

2 sentences, 21 words! Movement Charter Drafting Committee Elections are coming. Translating the voting tool SecurePoll in as many native tongues is crucial for this. But: there are two sentences we need to be translated for this. Please support the effort to make this a global experience. Thank you for helping out!

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Meta eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Meta‎, 14:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Threats from IP editors[change source]

Hi. You may have noticed this one [13]. I was accused of sock-puppeting, now POV pushing, all without any rationale at all. I guess this is a function of being more active in the community. Of note, it seems as if they are from slightly different IP addresses but all from the same company, so probably the same person. Not sure if that counts as sockpuppeting, but if they are pretending that it is coming from "multiple editors" and therefore "justifies a block", that may be an abuse. What do you think? Or should I just ignore such nonsense? Blissyu2 (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And just for the record, I am voting in all RfDs and you may notice that the majority of my votes are delete. I'm just giving my honest opinion and trying my best to follow the guidelines. If I made a mistake in my interpretation, I am sorry, but there is no POV pushing or any agenda. I am just trying to be a good Wikipedia editor. That's my whole point of being here. I don't really like threats like that, and it all seems to be coming from the same IP editor. I don't know who he is or why he made these assumptions of bad faith, but it seems to have reached a point that I am quite worried about. Blissyu2 (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Not related to your whole thread here, but I saw that you wrote vote, Just a friendly reminder RFDs are not for 'votes' --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I am well aware of that. I have repeatedly stated to this IP person that his attempts to discredit my opinion are unimportant because the RfD is not a vote. It's becoming quite irritating, and these latest threats seem to be an escalation of a growing issue with this particular person. I might be wrong, but they seem to be the same person logging in from a handful of slightly different IP addresses (all from the same company) who pretends that they have a majority view. I think that might constitute sockpuppeting, but I'm not sure. Blissyu2 (talk) 00:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. When the closing admin takes a look at the RFDs, they will probably take in to account which comments and valid and which are not. I would suggest leaving a notice on WP:AN, but let's see what Ferien says about this first though. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why they are accusing you of using multiple accounts/IPs, I don't think you are at all. They don't have any evidence that you are a sockpuppet so they are casting aspersions. I'd ignore them. --Ferien (talk) 16:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I also noticed this one which accused me of casting a false keep vote and of accepting money for my vote, when I actually voted delete [14]. However, I note that after that someone who may be a paid editor wrote on my talk page, which is just plain bizarre. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is the probable paid editor: [15]. It seems fairly obvious to me but I might be wrong. It makes me wonder if the IP is actually trying to hide their own paid editing? I don't know. Quite bizarre. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Movement Charter/Drafting Committee/MCDC Voter Email short 12-10-2021[change source]

Hallo Ferien,

du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch bei Meta registriert hast.

Die Seite Movement Charter/Drafting Committee/MCDC Voter Email short 12-10-2021 ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:


Frist zur Übersetzung der Seite: 2021-10-11.

The Movement Charter Drafting Committee Election starts next Monday. We would like to send eligible voters an email, letting them know that now is the time to vote. Of course this should happen in the respective language of the voter. It is only 195 words, a few minutes of work with a great impact! Any language is highly appreciated, we appreciate your help a lot. Thank you and have a great weekend! :)

Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Meta eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.

Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.

Vielen Dank, die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Meta‎, 17:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

ac[change source]

Hey! What is "Authority Control" template? Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tsugaru :) The authority control template links Wikipedia articles to library catalogue systems and other stuff. --Ferien (talk) 15:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-41[change source]

Tech News: 2021-41[change source]

15:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Brij Kishore Sharma "Tara"[change source]

Hi you have protected that page for recreating but please unprotect that page because that time the page was deleted because of lack of sources but now I have too many reliable sources you can see below You can see that now there are many sources in that page so please undelete that page (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:3000:412d:f9f8:7c12:95c5:8c8a (talkcontribs) 07:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please start a discussion at deletion review. --Ferien (talk) 16:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent disruptive edits[change source]

Greetings! Continuous disruption going on at Insyde, [16], [17] from possible a LTA. --Ramaswar(discuss) 06:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've nominated the page for deletion at RfD, as there is a claim to notability in the article, e.g. was top 40 for the entire week of release --Ferien (talk) 06:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good decision, thank you. Ramaswar(discuss) 06:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check page please[change source]

Hello, a recent page that I'm creating has nominated for deletion from unexperience editor. Rilwanu Lukman he already has page on English Wikipedia DanAmari44 (talk) 17:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I just had a look at this and there seems to be a bit of a dispute between DanAmari44 and 512 megabytes in relation to the article on Rilwanu Lukman. As I am not involved in that, I'd like to give my view. Rilwanu Lukman is, in my view, a very notable figure with articles on 4 other Wikis and, while any editor has every right to nominate any article for deletion, it seems on this occasion that 512 megabytes was probably wrong in nominating that (though the RfD is still ongoing and a decision has not been made yet). DanAmari44 responded to it being nominated for deletion with some quite inappropriate responses, by removing the RfD tag and blanking the RfD page (etc), which I think, outside of Wikipedia, is a normal reaction to someone behaving badly (which I would guess is how DanAmari44 has viewed 512 megabytes's reaction). This is compounded by 512 megabytes then putting 2 warnings on DanAmari44's page, when he was the one who nominated it for deletion and therefore is involved. So my view is that 512 megabytes shouldn't have been the one to give the warnings, and it would be helpful if an uninvolved editor tried to sort it out. While clearly DanAmari44's responses are inappropriate, they may be well-meaning and represent a misunderstanding of the process. It might not be, of course, as it could be that DanAmari44 is simply pretending to be new and is actually just disruptive. Who knows. But I think perhaps a bit of showing good faith could be a good move in this case, and perhaps work with DanAmari44. I checked DanAmari's other article that he created, and that one is on a notable subject too. It seems that DanAmari is translating notable subjects into Simple English, which is what we are supposed to be doing here. He is just reacting badly to being challenged. Blissyu2 (talk) 04:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

self-trout[change source]

To join the secret cabal follow me!Rainbow trout.png


Whack!

Made a really silly mistake :( --Ferien (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help![change source]

Hello, I will kindly need your help

  • How to know the number of edits I make to Wikipedia
  • How to create pages deleted via RfdJust do good (talk) 03:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

uk[change source]

Do they have halloween in the UK? Tsugaru let's talk! :) 21:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, we definitely do :) --Ferien (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I always get tempted to go trick-or-treating even if I am a little bit too old for it, cause who says we cannot be child at heart? :) Are you going to do anything for it? This year I will be doing my homework :P --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 21:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Only in England, or is it everywhere? (includes Northern Ireland) SHB2000 (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure Halloween is all over the United Kingdom including Northern Ireland, although I've never been there. --Ferien (talk) 11:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. Seems quite unusual to me, given that halloween is rarely celebrated in Oceania (includes Aus, NZ + some other Pacific countries. No idea about PNG, although given that it was once part of Aus, I don't think they do) SHB2000 (talk) 13:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ironically in the Catholic Church (If I am correct) they don't celebrate Halloween, but they had a church calender that had "Halloween" printed on October 31 --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 02:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enemy[change source]

Do you know changerbruss is my friend I see him almost everyday I told him day before yesterday that I created a article on simple Wikipedia that a gospel rapper Nimi stix that it wasn't give rfd for 3 days and my friend changerbruss is jealous and he added rfd to the Nimi stix article that changerbruss is the guys that owns am good o o one account and gimmelover that is blocked he is trying to promote himself by creating his own article DC Themmie he saw that I created a article on simple Wikipedia that is not rfd notified and then he added rfd that changerbruss u most block him he is abusing many accounts on Wikipedia and spoiling Nigeria 444metaphor (talk) 22:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please[change source]

Help me keep an eye on Nimi stix article do not let changerbruss or am good oone or any ip address to add rfd to Nimi Stix article 444metaphor (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of pages on 18 October 2021[change source]

Hi, can you please protect all pages? These pages are vandalized! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4454:6a6:c400:c5ba:2045:2678:efc8 (talkcontribs) 01:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which pages would you like me to protect? --Ferien (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-42[change source]

Tech News: 2021-42[change source]

20:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks:[change source]

Thank you for blocking that creepy stalker/troll. I'm honestly sick of that troll making threats to get my information. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 18:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page to be deleted - Obvious advertising[change source]

Good morning,

I wanted to report the following page:

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Raffaeli

This is blatant advertising, the entry is not encyclopaedic and a user (Allensyllos) keeps removing the quick deletion request. The character on the page in question is self-promoting for his real estate business in Dubai, any source given is self-promotional. He is blatantly doing this to legitimise his position for promotional purposes. The page has also been reported to other admins.

Eikeran (talk) 08:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I responded on Allensyllos' talk page where you made another comment. Thanks. --Ferien (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]