User talk:Ferien/Archives/2021/January

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On the reversion to an earlier edit

What is the purpose of you removing a link to provide more context on the "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" page? Hulksar2003 (talk) 18:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm responding on your talk page. :) I take a long time to type these things. Apologies. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 18:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded. Please see your talk page. :) Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you. I understand now. For some reason, I didn't even realize that I was on the simple English version of Wikipedia. That explains why it said an article hadn't been created yet even though I saw it on the main Wikipedia. My mistake. And I don't have much to add on the subject of Louis Blanc unfortunately. I was just trying to learn more about the phrase and was intimidated by the large quantity of red links, once again not realizing which version of Wikipedia I was on. But in any case, thanks for clearing things up. Hulksar2003 (talk) 05:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, it's nothing to worry about. :) Belwine • 💬 • 📜 11:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Block of IPs

Hi Belwine, thanks a lot for your changes. You mentioned on VIP that you thought an IP address should be given an indefinite block. Please note that the maximum we really do on an IP is 6 months at an absolute last resort. IPs can change and so eventually, we will blocking someone unrelated to the vandal if indef. As a result, only accounts where we know who is editing can be blocked indefinitely. Thanks, --IWI (talk) 17:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thank you for this.
The editor was quite disruptive, was not willing to cooperate with quite a few other editors who reverted the changes and block evaded by changing IPs, which is why I said indef block. They had got a block on EnWikipedia as well as a previous one from DannyS712 here but I agree, IP addresses change and blocking someone who is completely different would not be a good idea.. The IP range is blocked for 3 months now for LTA but I think this editor will come back again on another IP address... Making IP blocks for a few months at a time max. makes sense, definitely.
Many thanks, :) Belwine • 💬 • 📜 17:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

deletion

hi. im the official head of wikipedia. i have changed my username.delete this page immidiately. --Shreyas861 (talk) 14:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The reason I requested your page for quick deletion is because it fell under QD criteria G1. If the page doesn't meet the criteria, it won't be deleted.
Unfortunately, there is no "official head of wikipedia" so please don't attempt to troll me. :)
Many thanks. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 14:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for your tireless contributions in anti-vandalism! --
Thank you for the barnstar! :) Belwine • 💬 • 📜 08:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of my things

i dont know how to link something like the official nazi concentration camps i was only adding them to this https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazi_concentration_camps sorry, i was tryna make it more filled out — Preceding unsigned comment added by TacticalFixer (talk • contribs) 14:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, when making articles that are on lists, don't copy from EnWikipedia though. Creating articles that are red links on lists is good IMO, it gets rid of red links, but make sure that it's not copied from EnWikipedia, and that it's simplified. Then you can add attribution on the talk page. Many thanks. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 14:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My response doesn't seem precise enough looking back now. You can copy from another Wikipedia, as long as it follows WP:How to copy from another Wikipedia, and as long as it isn't complex. Many thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 22:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Working together proposal

Are you willing to workwith me to prevent editing others from vandialism?KP (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'd say at the moment we both revert vandalism on a regular basis, and technically, we all work together removing vandalism, we don't necessarily need to say it. There aren't many times where you need to work together on vandalism, unless there is a huge situation like there was the other day (see THIS page's history), but you can join Wikiproject Antivandalism here. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 15:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.KP (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mizanur_Rahman_Azhari

See, I'm not guilty on this. On personal, this is an encyclopedia and not a social media. I'm a bengali user but not Bangladeshi. I'm indian. Leave that. I think we should this as it is going to be deleted.KP (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well it appears they don't meet the GNG guidelines for now. You don't need to bother editing the article regularly as it probably will be deleted.
Many thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
right you are.KP (talk) 09:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The first keep request on the rfd said "He is very popular on social media" which is not necessarily a reason to keep. If I can see lots of reliable sources for him then I'll be very happy to change my vote to keep. Hope this answers your questions. Many thanks, --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thnx for explaining.KP (talk) 09:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

┌───────────────────┘
 Ok, please don't hesitate to ask any more questions in the future :) Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Delete

Hello. I want you to check "talk" on my article Poshlaja Molly. Droppank (talk) 14:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Droppank: Hello. I've had a look. The article may be on the Russian Wikipedia, but it's worth noting that there are no Google News results for this band, meaning that there's not really enough independent coverage. I'd recommend discussing more on the RfD, which you can find here. Many thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 15:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no. there are a lot of google news about poshlaja molly, just google "Пошлая Молли". Droppank (talk) 16:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Droppank: There appear to be a few results under this name, but on the second page, I'm seeing unrelated search results come up. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 16:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

but i still dont understand. article has many good official references (i just don't know how to explain it, because i don't speak english very well) Droppank (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

also they're famous in russia, and you can check it on youtube, google, genius and etc Droppank (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check WP:GNG. I personally don't think it meets gng requirements. A lot of the Google News stuff I've seen appears to be the festivals they're going to, it's not exclusively about them. Thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 12:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://the-flow.ru/features/poshlaya-molly-interview-2018 https://daily.afisha.ru/music/4742-poshlaya-molli-novyy-mem-pop-s-ukrainy/ https://66.ru/news/freetime/203259/ https://24smi.org/celebrity/42397-gruppa-poshlaia-molli.html https://www.mtv.ru/news/poshlaya-molli/ https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Пошлая_Молли — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droppank (talk • contribs) 18:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh this article nearly meets notability requirements. I've only really been here for a couple of weeks and I'm not really experienced on this type of stuff so I'd recommend discussing more on the RfD where more of a consensus has been reached. Thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


You've got mail!

Hello, Ferien. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 03:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 03:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Please check your email for the response. I have also removed it... :) Belwine • 💬 • 📜 12:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again (I'm Sorry if you discourage these notifications) --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done! Don't worry about the notifications, I am absolutely fine with them. They are helpful to me as I don't check my Wikipedia email that often.. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 22:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor!
Hello Ferien/Archives/2021 Thank you very much for your kind response. You are really good person also. Hope that you are well. — Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 14:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the barnstar. :) Also, I am well, at least as well as I can be at the moment, thanks for asking. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 14:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles

Hello dear friend, I owe you well, I'm going to stay, tell me if I'm allowed to move Wikipedia articles hereMrtanhaa (talk) 11:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've written on your talk page. You can't copy word for word from English Wikipedia, you'll need to do some simplification and add attribution. I added attribution to the article you created. If you want to learn how to copy from en.wikipedia.org, go to WP:How to copy from another Wikipedia. When simplifying, you can use WP:Basic English combined wordlist. If you need any more help, let me know, I'll be more than happy to help you! :) --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 11:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, I'm trying to make Wikipedia simple, my goal is not sabotage. Hoping for good days my friend.

If I did not follow a point, tell me. Thank youMrtanhaa (talk) 17:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrtanhaa: Ok, I just added talkback to check you've seen this. Btw, if you're copying from the English Wikipedia and no simplification is needed, you need to add attribution. Basically, add {{translated article|en|ARTICLE NAME|version=123}} to the new articles you create. Let me know if you need any help with this. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 17:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I add a photo to the article? I'm a photographer, can I upload photos of articles myself? They do not have copyrightMrtanhaa (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, feel free to add images that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.
Make sure to add attribution to the article. You can do this by going to the version you copied, getting the name and "oldid" and then adding it to the template {{translated article|en|ARTICLE NAME|version=123}}. Remember there should be at least some simplification. Thanks Belwine • 💬 • 📜 17:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mrtanhaa: I see your pages have been requested for deletion but don't worry, you can still create good pages. Just remember to simplify using WP:Basic English combined wordlist or WP:Basic English ordered wordlist, read WP:How to copy from another Wikipedia and add attribution using the translated article template. Remember to ask me if you need help at all. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 18:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, can I upload Javad Safaee's photo to Wiki commons? I am his photographer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrtanhaa (talk • contribs) 18:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. If you created the photo yourself and you are allowed to use the photo, then you can upload to Commons. Definitely double check when uploading to UploadWizard on the commons. I am not an expert on copyright, so please upload to Commons at your own risk. If in doubt, go to the Help desk. Thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @Mrtanhaa: Is Safaee paying you to edit his page? --IWI (talk) 19:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ImprovedWikiImprovment: This doesn't answer this question but... Safaee's label is "Cpersian" and the user who created the page was Cpersian. Almost definitely COI editing with Cpersian. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ImprovedWikiImprovment: *sigh* Now blocked for abusing multiple accounts... it's annoying when that happens :( Belwine • 💬 • 📜 16:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EU Code Week

Hi, The page EU Code Week was deleted on 12 January after you suggested it to be deleted, although it says that the request will close on 19 January.

It is unclear how to dispute the deletion, but I added my arguments in the discussion on this page discussion page. I do not know if you have seen this message.

"I do not agree that the text is written like an add. The sentences are factual statements backed up with independent citations. There is no use of language that praises or promotes. The text is not copied, which could be easily proved with a simple Google search, as well as by checking the citations.158.169.150.18.

I am sorry to bother you, but it is not very easy to find one's way through publishing on Wikipedia. I hope you agree to publish the page.

Kind regards, AOestean (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for the message.
I was going to write a really long reply to this message, but decided against it at the final second.
The reason the page was deleted was because it sounded a bit like an advertisement, and it didn't sound very encyclopedic in my opinion. FYI, it was not deleted by me, it was deleted by Macdonald-ross (talk • changes • e-mail • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • right changes). If you wanted to create the article again, you could, but EU Code Week doesn't seem to meet WP:N (notability) guidelines, and so it might be deleted again.
If you have any more questions about this, please ask me. Best, --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 13:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


New here

Hey Belwine, I am new here, from ArWiki, Iraqi. I have some feelings about starting here, I don't know about SimEnWiki much. My english is fine, starts from middle school education, then internet and chating with English speaking people in social media. Iraq's first foreign language is Eng, but it's not my L2 and i am poor in grammer. What is your view? do you think i can work here? --Ruwaym (talk) 09:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you could work here. Your English seems good. This is the Simple English Wikipedia, so your English doesn't have to be really advanced. See WP:Basic English combined wordlist (edit) and WP:Basic English ordered wordlist, see which words you know. You definitely won't end up using all the words on the wordlist, so don't worry if you don't know some of them. If you are familiar with a reasonable amount of the words on there, you should be able to write and extend articles. Finally, as you know, anyone can edit Wikipedia, so if you make any mistakes then others will fix it. Best, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I know more than this words, the problem is my weak grammer while i know a lot of specific terms of my field, like literature and linguistics. I will try here, I am also blocked in EnWiki and no admin responds me there i was a newcomer and attacked another user they blocked me infinite. --Ruwaym (talk) 02:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that's good. If grammar is your only issue then that is ok, I can correct your changes.
I'm not an admin here, but I'm very happy to help you if you need any more help. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 08:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While our target audience is people that don't have a strong grasp on the English language. It is actually harder to write Simple English than regular English. It does take a strong grasp on the language to write it more simple. -Djsasso (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As a native speaker, I find it relatively easy to speak in Simple English although when you're translating from another language -> English -> Simple English (it's not really translating, but it's changing the language further) it can be harder to write Simple English, you're basically translating twice IMO. Good point that I totally missed by a mile... Belwine • 💬 • 📜 17:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I gonna work on Arabic poetry and Arab poets biographies here, and maybe politics. --Ruwaym (talk) 00:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, something I didn't mention was taking a look at how en.wikipedia articles compare to articles here. I'd recommend doing that before writing here, personally. Thanks, --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 20:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I adopt this approach:
  1. Sentences in English wiki are too long: split them down into simpler sentences.
  2. Rework the words in the direction of being simple: imagine you are teaching intelligent 10-year olds.
  3. End up with something you might say to an intelligent child, but...
  4. ...respect the concept: if it really needs more space, give it more space, but phrase it simply.
  5. Better to break text into more sentences than to make sentences more complicated.
  6. To improve as a writer, read good English. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have got mail!

Hello, Ferien. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 19:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--IWI (talk) 19:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - if there's a response to the email then reply to this Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And I made a few mistakes in my original email so I've sent another one... Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A slightly complicated text thing on John Wilkes Booth

So I was looking on at the page John Wilkes Booth when I noticed a piece of text describing his death.

This description was not showcased on "normal" Wikipedia until today (when I edited it) as it originally described him simply dying of shots fired by Boston Corbett.

The simple description was that he was shot, in constant pain, and died a slow and painful death of asphyxiation.

Thought you ought to know since it's kind of... not simple. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xdude gamer (talk • contribs) 19:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah.. that doesn't look very simple. I would improve it but, tbh with you, I don't know very much about the subject. I'll try simplifying it later or tomorrow maybe.. For now though, I have put a complex tag on it. Thanks, --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 20:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello bro! Is there any ground to call me sock puppet? I think there's no longer threat with my new account. If there's, please help me to solve the problem. Haoreima (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're only a sock puppet if you are abusing two accounts or more. From what I can see, you haven't been doing that. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 10:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is meant by abusing, may I know. Haoreima (talk) 10:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abusing is using something for bad. For example, if you were using one account to do good things and one account to do bad things, that is abusing two accounts, which is sockpuppetry. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 10:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Haoreima (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Feel free to ask if you need any more help. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 14:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Make a mistake

Hi, I had a question. I created this page by mistake. How can I delete it?--IEureka (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested it for deletion under G7 (author requests deletion). Thanks, --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 22:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I apologize for bothering you 🙌🥰--IEureka (talk) 22:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine, don't worry. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 22:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I had a question, how did you make your signature?--IEureka (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to say I made it, but I didn't. I copied it from someone on the English Wikipedia, and I've forgotten who... If you want to copy it then it's <span style="border-radius: 20px; color: white; background: #FF0000; padding: 3.5px;">[[User:Belwine|<span style="color: #fff;">Belwine</span>]] • [[User talk:Belwine|💬]] • [[Special:Contribs/Belwine|📜]]</span> but replace all the Belwines with your name. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, my dear friend, I made the color black so that it is no longer similar so that it does not make a mistake.--IEureka • 💬 • 📜 15:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! Belwine • 💬 • 📜 15:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello Belwine! I have created a series of articles in the past few days. And I noticed other editors don't review them much. If there's no problem, it's okay. Else, please review my works and kindly inform me if there's any problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haoreima (talk • contribs) 09:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check through now and see if there are any issues. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Haoreima: Your articles seem to be good so far.
There could be some simplification done to them though. So instead of using "principal", you could use "main" or instead of using "ancient", you could use "very old".
Other than that, there don't seem to be any other issues. Maybe try getting more of a variety of sources in the articles?
Keep up the good work! --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 10:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles deleted

Hello Belwine! I have noticed some of my articles were deleted. Ngangkhaleima and Khuman Puremba are some. The reason was said to be because they are people. Actually, they are fictional characters, not real persons. But I think there'll be some way to save the articles. If there's, please suggest me. Haoreima (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, apologies I wasn't able to answer quick enough. I'm in UTC/Wikipedia time, so it was only 5:18am for me then! Anyway, I don't think there's a way to save the articles. You may be able to get the article undeleted and moved to your user space, I am not sure whether that's possible but just a suggestion. Thanks, --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 08:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for suggestion. Haoreima (talk) 08:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yo!

So what do you think about the vishnu airtcle should i add more information about it? Or stay as it is (950CMR (talk) 17:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC))[reply]

 (change conflict)  It is quite good, but I think it will need some spelling, punctuation and grammar corrections, mainly corrections with spacing after punctuation. I don't think you need to add much more information to it. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 17:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The powers and abilities section is completely rad i'm thinking about adding citations to it but there's a problem I can't really find a authentic free bhagavata purana 950CMR (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the powers and abilities section should be changed - some of the words are too complicated. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 17:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure but some dude will say the powers and abilities section looks fishy that's why i'm thinking about adding citations to it but i will do it later since my Jio Quota has expired for today 950CMR (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like metapotence? Some people will get confused because metapotence and omnipotence sounds and the definition itself is pretty similar 950CMR (talk) 17:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both those words are too complicated IMO. For the powers and abilities section, just rewrite it and add reliable sources if you can. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 17:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Although omnipotence is having limitless power and metapotence is having the power to do anything 950CMR (talk) 17:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I will add it when my jio quota recovers if you don't know i'm talking about just see the jio airtcle in the Orginal Wikipedia 950CMR (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aight so hear me out jio data quota restores in 12:50 am and it's currently 11:45 pm in my country so it won't take that time 950CMR (talk) 18:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This might be an off-topic question but why atheists calls omnipotence the ability to everything when it's actually metapotence? 950CMR (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do* 950CMR (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This the reason why people thinks that metapotence and omnipotence are the same thing so imma gonna change omnipotence into having limitless power and metapotence name into having the power to do anything 950CMR (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now...

See the vishnu airtcle 950CMR (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a bad thing if add more vishnu purana and bhagavad gita references? Right.. 950CMR (talk) 18:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@950CMR: sorry for the late reply! I'll have another look at it now Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@950CMR: Hello! The article is slightly better now, but I think it will need some more simplification. I will look at it later. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty ezz actually you need divine vision to see god's infinite dimensional form that is beyond time and space therofore us mere normal human beings can't comprehend it 950CMR (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add that bruh 950CMR (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also you should read the Mahabharata a historical masterpiece why i'm calling it? since it has thousand of Archeological evidences about it 950CMR (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am just talking about how it is for simplicity and readability, not what I think about the subject of the article itself, if that is what you are suggesting. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here: (link) 950CMR (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A 6,935 page document? I'm a bit confused here... Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, where possible, please make as many points as possible in one change, instead of making lots of small edits. I like my talk page organised, as you can tell from my edit summaries like Talk page edit S1A121. Making lots of changes takes up a lot of space in the edit history. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cuz mahabharata is 950CMR (talk) 19:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The longest book in the world.. 950CMR (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am not sure what that has to do with the Vishnu article. I'm going to remove the document link from this page as I don't want external links on my page. Thanks, --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The amount of philosophical and scientific stuff mahabharata has is amazing mahabharata will make you realize that people in 30K bce had better technology than us and we're not evolving we're actually going into the past with more inferior technology it's quite simple 950CMR (talk) 19:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah bruh but it's quite worth it since i gaved you a stuff that has infinite widsom and knowledge in it 950CMR (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure since the thing i gaved you costs 70$ we don't wanna get copyrighted by penguin books are we? 950CMR (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, please don't post copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure but do you think you wanna read mahabharata tho since it has so many stuffs that you didn't knew before 950CMR (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just politefully remind you that Wikipedia is not a forum and we need to all be here to focus on building an encyclopedia? Thanks --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also reading mahabharata is very related to vishnu airtcle cuz you can know a lot of stuff about him and add more information to it now you got wisdom knowledge more advanced knowledge about ancient science and adding more info to vishnu airtcle 950CMR (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI I usually create articles about French communes and British villages/towns. I also go around clearing up general spam and vandalism, as well as fixing errors. Religion is definitely not my area of expertise! However, you can be bold and write about it, as you seem to know more about it. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking on a airtcle tho it's on an talk page and i'm basically saying that if you're interested knowing and helping the vishnu airtcle you can read the Mahabharata now it depends on you wether you want to read it or not otherwise I would never bring this entire thing anyways rn 950CMR (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even talk pages are for talking about improving the article itself, talk pages are not replacements for forums. See en:WP:FORUM --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't I say I was also talking about improving the airtcle tho anyways i'm going to add more sources now bye then 950CMR (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, goodbye, enjoy the rest of your day! Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also btw adding sources from iskon isn't allowed since only scholarly sources are allowed like the vishnu purana mahabharata kgm aka kisari Mohan Ganguli and bori critical edition and the Bhagavata purana if you want to improve vishnu airtcle keep these in mind you can always add sources from sacred texts 950CMR (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isckon or iscon is an popular cult of Krishna if you didn't knew that bori critical edition isn't not free unlike kgm mahabharata so you will have to add sources from kgm mahabharata although bori critical edition is infinitely more reliable and more authentic keep that in mind tho 950CMR (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note

A user's experience is not relevent to this, just so you know. Any user can make mistakes, and that user being experienced wasn't why I reverted you; it was because of the link he provided showing that that person may not have died. I only say this because you said that you should have checked his userpage. Best :) --IWI (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source appeared reliable enough, so I think it's fair you reverted. Also, I was telling the user "You can revert my edit by pressing (undo)" when the user would probably know about this after being on Wikipedia projects for 15 years, I should have checked the user page for that. However, for the actual article, I should have checked a bit more before reverting, and I apologise for that as well. Thanks :) --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 21:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On a completely unrelated note.. Do I have to add attribution to a page if I'm just copying the infobox and population table from the English Wikipedia? --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 21:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I tend to do it in the edit summary, though when just adding an infobox. --IWI (talk) 09:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so if I just say in the edit summary "creation - infobox and population table are from enwiki", would that be sufficient? --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, and you can add the oldid if you want too. --IWI (talk) 09:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks :) --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 09:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joyalukkas Lifestyle Developers Page

Please tell me what I should change in the page so that it doesn't get deleted. You said it is a bad page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreekumarsk (talk • contribs) 12:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the company is very notable. At the bottom of the first page of search results, I'm already seeing LinkedIn and social media. Can't seem to find any news reports or anything like that --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 12:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Timelines

Hey Belwine, What do you know about timelines? I have an article that threw an error in Check Wikipedia and the timeline I have no clue how to fix. The page is 2020 Republican Party presidential primaries. The only change I made was correcting the duplicate refs.

Thanks, PotsdamLamb (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't know much about timelines sorry - I can see there's an error, but I don't know anything more than that. Sorry --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! No worries. I will check around. Thanks! PotsdamLamb (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, while you're here, I hope you don't mind me asking about WPCleaner? I've been doing some cleanups opening articles on the Check Wikipedia website and then editing them manually, is it worth installing WPCleaner to speed things up? Thanks --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it trims time down however, you have to be careful before making the edits as some are not always correct. PotsdamLamb (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you. I'll probably install it later today. Belwine • 💬 • 📜 15:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your continued and tireless work on either expanding articles, reverting vandalism or updating them. Your edits are a continued benefit for this Wikipedia. Keep up the good work! --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Same to you too, your work here is so important for this Wikipedia Belwine • 💬 • 📜 16:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...

So can i add Vishnu's 24 forms according to Bhagavata purana? 950CMR (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, be bold, as long as it is simple and sourced. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 18:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The IP proxy

I put the block notice on the talk page because the proxy needed to be told they were blocked, even though I don’t have admin rights here. Wagnerrrr (I think we need to talk) 19:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxies can be blocked at any time for any period of time, per m:Open proxy. Also, they were making changes that anyone would know full well cannot be on Wikipedia. A block should not come as a surprise to them. I also recall seeing similar changes earlier from a different IP, so I wouldn't be surprised if it was block evasion too. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 19:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Yes, you need to be very careful when using it! --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ferien/Archives/2021/January&oldid=7762120"