July 2022[change source]

Please do not add wrong information into articles. Your changes appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please provide a source for your information or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --IWI (talk) 23:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the change, consider creating an account so you won't get notices that are not for you.

I did cite sources. 2604:3D08:D17B:F020:E5F7:F24E:1575:412A (talk) 23:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube videos uploaded by people are not reliable sources, but I'm not entertaining this any further. --IWI (talk) 00:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You said "not entertaining this any further.". You have in mind that I was saying or doing to get a laugh? I was not. The videos I cited did give example safe, good, ready sources, as an outcome of that, they are safe, good, ready. 2604:3D08:D17B:F020:E5F7:F24E:1575:412A (talk) 00:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the videos did use reliable sources, but they cherrypicked only a small amount of the information available. They used ice cores in one area of Greenland, and assumed that this measured temperatures throughout the whole world. If you look at all the information available, it doesn't support the idea that global temperatures were hotter within the last 6000 years. This article goes further into detail: https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-what-greenland-ice-cores-say-about-past-and-present-climate-change/ Lights and freedom (talk) 00:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(change conflict) No, but that information has no reliable sources under our definition, and has scientific journals etc. that say the opposite, so it is not going to be entertained on any Wikipedia with current scientific knowledge. They are fringe theories. --IWI (talk) 00:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ImprovedWikiImprovment The videos are considered fringe theories. If you look at the videos, they cite some reliable scientific journals/papers, but they use them in an incorrect way. So the videos are not reliable and cannot be considered accurate sources. Lights and freedom (talk) 00:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. This is simply a waste of everyone's time. There are no reliable sources supporting your claims. --IWI (talk) 00:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You All are wrong because AllatRa TV is using the primordial knowledgeable discovered in the books at https:books.allatra.org/en while the other sources are not!

70.68.168.129 (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
(talk page stalker) Pinging @ImprovedWikiImprovment:, @Lights and freedom:. Hockeycatcat (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These books are about spiritual knowledge so there's no reason to think they would give any reliable information about global warming. @Hockeycatcat No claim of scientific authority at all, so no use considering this. Lights and freedom (talk) 05:37, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

body-less knowledge is a sort of scientific knowledge. And the book PRIMORDIAL ALLATRA PHYSICS (https:books.allatra.org/en/kniga-iskonnaja-fizika-allatra) is about physics; physics are not always thought source.

70.68.168.129 (talk) 05:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP User — It is in no way a scientific knowledge. It is defined as Spiritual knowledge is about the deep human concerns of our existence, and of our connection with the whole universe. by dictionary and encyclopedia definitions. So I am agreeing with our admins and my fellow editors. This article does not meet any of the requirements for Wikipedia. Da Lamb^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 05:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those things talked-about in the statements of body-less knowledge are scientific!

70.68.168.129 (talk) 05:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

=[change source]

@ImprovedWikiImprovment:, @Lights and freedom:. Hockeycatcat (talk) @Da Lamb

Very-detailed proof that climate change is caused by a 12,000-year cycle of galatic interactions[change source]

Here's very-detailed proof that climate change is caused by a 12,000-year cycle of galatic interactions: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uzQO5sBW6AY%2C, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PMNJ4Lwoo48,and https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WAlyvbt8Nlk.

Yes, there is the Milankovitch cycles. Of course, this isn't the main cause of current global warming. Lights and freedom (talk) 01:48, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That 12,000-year cycle of galatic interactions isn't a Milankovitch cycle. 209.52.88.82 (talk) 01:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see. If you can find the article about this on en.wikipedia, maybe it can be mentioned in Climate change. Lights and freedom (talk) 01:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lights and freedom

Why do I need to do that? 209.52.88.82 (talk) 02:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because these videos aren't reliable sources Lights and freedom (talk) 02:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lights and freedom

No, they are reliable because the people in those videos are experts. 209.52.88.82 (talk) 02:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for a person who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. An IP address can be shared by many people. If you feel that things said here are not about you, you can create an account or log in to stop it happening again.