Jump to content

User talk:Astronomyscientist124

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2020

[change source]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent change appears to have added wrong information and has been removed. If you think the information that you added was correct, please provide a source for the change or discuss it on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Thank you. --IWI (talk) 16:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir

[change source]

Celine Dion did die though.Astronomyscientist124 (talk) 16:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Looking online I can see that Dion is 52 years old and is very much alive. She certainly did not die in June according to reliable sources. It is plainly not true. --IWI (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have evidence

[change source]

I do have evidence but I cannot discuss it with you now as I am working.Astronomyscientist124 (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever evidence you have would have to be from a reliable source (and not original research). Good day, --IWI (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but I do not accept. Goodbye and thank you for your time, please do not contact me again.Astronomyscientist124 (talk) 16:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)}}[reply]

Warning

[change source]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to Wikipedia. However, some of your changes, like those to "Talk:Deaths in June 2020", did not seem to be helpful and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Clearly not true and no source can be found of such a statement that violates BLP. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 04:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know I didn’t add citations, but this event really happened. I included evidence in it so it is true, I am trying to not be rude however Celine Dion did die in a helicopter crash. I know I am trying to make Wikipedia a better place, but I am a scientist, I work, I edit. The New York Times spread the news but the URL has been removed from their website. I gave information of others who died in the past. Thank you and please do not contact me again.Astronomyscientist124 (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

[change source]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from changing pages without any more notices. --IWI (talk) 19:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry.Astronomyscientist124 (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be a fool, I was not disrupting Wikipedia.Astronomyscientist124 (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[change source]
You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in line with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. If you think this block is unfair, you may ask to be unblocked by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. DannyS712 (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Astronomyscientist124 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I was not trying to vandalise Wikipedia, all I was trying to do was expand some of the articles, but I'm sorry for what I've done and I will not do it again because now I know what I have been blocked for. Next time, I promise to make useful edits. I think being blocked indefinitely is unfair, that's because I'm a good editor on one hand, and I would like the block to be reduced, if that's okay. I promise not to do anything bad on Wikipedia again, I really do. Thank you. Astronomyscientist124 (talk) 22:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you are unable to address the issue of you adding incorrect information to articles, I find no reason to unblock.-- Chenzw  Talk  04:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]