User talk:Northamerica1000

RfD nomination of User talk:Northamerica1000/Clock documentation

An editor has requested deletion of User talk:Northamerica1000/Clock documentation, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/User talk:Northamerica1000/Clock documentation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Northamerica1000 (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

August 2014

Very short pages really do not need flags about lack of sources. A long page is quite another story. With a long page there is often a real need for sources. If someone says "Eggs can be fried, poached, scrambled or boiled" does that need a source? The fact is that we are a very small wiki, and our editors need to spend their time sensibly. Flags which tell editors things they are going to ignore just devalues the whole idea. When a sources flag goes up it should mean "I've considered this page and it really does need support". If everything gets flagged then, in effect, nothing gets flagged. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Macdonald-ross - I'll keep this in mind, and thanks for the notification. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)