Talk:QueerSportSplit

This article (or one that was redirected to it) was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep.

Neutrality[change source]

A tag on neutrality issue was raised here due to original author's potential involvement, but I do not see any arguments beyond that? Which perspective is missing to make it balanced? Should there be an anti-sport, an anti-queer or maybe both? If no one can source those or others in an encyclopedic way I think that should be removed. Zblace (talk) 19:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that the original creator of the article (who shared a name with the article) wrote in a way to promote the article and not in a NPOV but I am probably wrong. --Hellothere4 (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But there is not much promotional. I doubt that queer identifying organization aims at exploiting Simple Wikipedia article for major gains. Who is to remove this tag of admins? Zblace (talk) 19:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it too but when someone who is affiliated with a company creates an article for them there is a large chance that they will be bias towards how they word the article and such. Like for example, if I went ahead and made an article for a local store I like, I would probably word the article in a way to get other people wanting to go there instead of having a neutral view on the article. --Hellothere4 (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is a COI declaration it needs to remain up there for now, even though the person who created it is blocked for violating naming conventions. PotsdamLamb (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English[change source]

I am not an expert on the subject but I gave it a go and it is much more simple in terms of language structures and vocabulary, so if there are no more willing hands to help, but only those who object and than leave it, maybe that tag should also be removed? Zblace (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We should probably hold off on removing the tags from the article until it's fate is decided but I would take a second opinion. --Hellothere4 (talk) 19:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I put the not simple tag on the article, and whilst it is simpler now, it still isn't that simple. For example, "societal effects that the gender segregation unfolds, especially for and by examining the experiences of members" is quite complicated English that readers new to English may not understand. —Belwine (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]