User talk:Chenzw/Archives/Nov 2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chenzw/Archives/Nov_2016.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw.


The Signpost: 4 November 2016[change source]

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Simple English Wiki page BlackPanther OS does not meet criterion for quick deletion: G:11, Obvious advertising[change source]

Anyone who has requested this page to be deleted on grounds of meeting the quick deletion criterion G:11, Obvious advertising. Obvious advertising: Pages which were created only to say good things about a company, item, group or service and which would need to be written again so that they can be encyclopedic. However, simply having a company, item, group or service as its subject does not mean that an article can be deleted because of this rule: an article that is obvious advertising should have content that shouldn't be in an encyclopedia. If a page has already gone through RfD or QD and was not deleted, it should not be quickly deleted using this rule.

1. "Pages which were created only to say good things about a company, item, group or service and which would need to be written again so that they can be encyclopedic." This simple English page was created on the basis of the Hungarian BlackPanther OS wiki page since it did not (at the time of creating the Hungarian wiki page) have an English language wiki page and it seemed a reasonable way to start since there is international demand regarding an informative, encyclopaedic page for the product (it has multiple English speaking users in its facebook user group and obviously the product receives considerably more international attention if it has a wiki page therefore the developer(s) do not welcome the idea of deleting it).

2. "...which would need to be written again so that they can be encyclopedic." It would not have to be rewritten, only expanded to fully comply with the content and structure of the Hungarian wiki page since it was created as an interim webite while the English BlackPanther OS wiki page was being created, and not "only to say good things about a company, item, group or service". By the way, it states facts therefore the purpose of its creating could not have been "only to say good things about a company, item, group or service" since it was created to provide information to reach people looking for English language information on this particular product.

Therefore I would like to justify this undelete request on the basis of the obvious intention that this simple English wiki page will be very soo expanded and publsihed as the English language version of the Hungarian wiki page. I would like to ask for a deadline until which the English language version of the Hungarian BlackPanther OS wiki page shall be prepared. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tczgabor (talkcontribs)

What you have mentioned above has not demonstrated to me that the article does not actually fulfill QD G11:
1. Just because the article here "was created on the basis of the Hungarian" article does not exempt this article from the QD criteria.
2. I argue that the article will have to be rewritten so that it can be encyclopedic (I have bolded some problematic parts):
blackPanther OS is a free operating system developed by Hungarian developers. It has been in development since 2002. This distribution combines many good features form major distributions. The original aim of the developers was to reduce the differences between Microsoft Windows and Linux. Beginners choose it for ease of use, experienced users choose it for stability and reliability.
I cannot accept your justification for this undelete request. This wiki has no obligation to the Hungarian Wikipedia for providing an English language version of their article.
Also, from your message, it seems that you are one of the developers of the OS? "...and obviously the product receives considerably more international attention if it has a wiki page therefore the developer(s) do not welcome the idea of deleting it". Please note that you may have a conflict of interest. If the operating system is truly notable, there should not be a need for the developers themselves to write an article about the OS; other users will naturally end up writing such an article.
If you would like to make a further appeal, please go to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Chenzw  Talk  17:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this one is another possible spammer, crosswiki, could you confirm? Thanks.--HakanIST (talk) 08:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! I will be holding back on blocking for now, and will continue to observe. Chenzw  Talk  09:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, same content is being added by 119.30.39.215 --HakanIST (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have added to the wiki's spam blacklist. Hopefully this will stop them. Chenzw  Talk  09:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Re: Simple English Wiki page BlackPanther OS does not meet criterion for quick deletion: QD: G11, Obvious advertising - comments observed, quick reply[change source]

Hi! I've noted your comments. It seems that there is no real room for argument here, therefore, taking your observations and the requirements for wiki pages into consideration, I am going to recreate the BlackPanther OS Simple English wiki page in a properly encyclopaedic manner that does not classify as being advertisement-like. Regarding your question: I am not a developer of the OS, I am a contributor to the development of the OS, however, the developers' concerns are my concerns as well. Tczgabor (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Odd change by ChenzwBot[change source]

I don't understand this edit by ChenzwBot. The IP editor changed the template parameters to the correct spelling, and the bot changed them back. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure why either, but I will be adding this edit to the training queue. Hopefully it will not happen again. Chenzw  Talk  11:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Chenzw[change source]

Hi I would like use the rollbacker for revert vandalisme. Can you give me a rollbacker? :) Murbaut (talk) 13:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 November 2016[change source]

21:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your bot reports already reported people[change source]

Earlier today, I reported an IP for vandalism. A few minutes later, ChenzwBot reported the IP again. Is this a bug or do you have a reason for it? Computer Fizz (talk) 21:34, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I don't think ChenzwBot checks to see if a user has already been reported. The bot doesn't even edit the same page that user reports are on; it edits a separate page that's transcluded onto the main page. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What Auntof6 said is right - the bot doesn't check for existing reports. I will, however, look into addressing this soon. Chenzw  Talk  01:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]