User talk:Psl631

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search




User talk
  • If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then notify my talk page.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.
WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE!

Click here to add page to your watchlist.
Latest editor and timestamp since last edit: This page was last edited by Enfcer (talk | contribs) 22 days ago.

Click here to start new section with preload help text and instructions

Add new section to this talk page

Quick templates:


Some of your recent QD requests[change source]

When you choose a QD option, please don't say "maybe" an issue exists. For example, your QD reason for African Americans in the Revolutionary War said "Copied from a website? unknown site (please add url if you found where the text is copied from)". If you can't say what website an article was copied from, then you can't use that QD option. If you aren't certain that a QD option applies, then use the RfD process instead, or let someone else evaluate the article. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok. I saw it was copied from any website. After I QDed the page, saw I at the text was copied from English Wikipedia, too complex, I use a Rfd if the page is possibly copied from a website. Sorry :( --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 04:14, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
No, that is incorrect. You are misunderstanding Auntof6 completely. I am starting to have serious doubts about your competence as an editor on this wiki. Chenzw  Talk  04:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I agf when I add a qd. --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 05:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
No, that is still not what Auntof6 meant. This has nothing to do with AGF. Let me quote Auntof6 again: "If you aren't certain that a QD option applies, then use the RfD process instead, or let someone else evaluate the article." Chenzw  Talk  05:18, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I use the Rfd process if the article does not meet the QD criteria and uses Rfd if text is possibly copied from a website. Ok --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
What did you mean when you said "I saw it was copied from any website"? Specifically, I'm not sure what you were saying by putting the word any there. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Auntof6:Sorry. I mean when I say "copied from a website" it was copied from a website, then checked I the enwiki page, and the text was copied from enwiki. --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 07:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Maintenance tags[change source]

I noticed this change where you added several maintenance tags to the article: npov, confusing, notability, and wikify. I agree with the last one, because there were no links, formatting, etc. However, please explain why you added the other three. For convenience, here is what was in the article when you added the tags:

Collared doves are relatively small and slim doves. Males and females look alike, with a pastel buff/grey body and pink accents and slightly darker grey on it's wings and tail. Fom the tip of its beak to the tip of it's tail , it measures 32cm.

You often add maintenance tags that don't seem to apply. Therefore, until you explain your thinking about the tags here, please do not add maintenance tags to any more pages. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

@Auntof6:Ok, next time i add a tag, will I double-check the article to add a QD template, RFD, or add tags to it, if the page is very bad and/or vandalism, will I QD the page, if the page are little bad content, but it needs discussed deletion, will I Rfd the page, if page is only plain text, too complex, and/or only too dirty, will I add correct tags to the article, not wrong. I double check next time and does recommended thing.--Psl631 (talk · contribs) 19:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
That's not what I said. I wasn't talking about QD or RFD at all. I said do not add any tags until you explain why you added the npov, confusing, and notability tags to the article I mentioned above. Where was the non-neutral point of view? What was confusing? Why did you think that notability wasn't shown? --Auntof6 (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Auntof6: The tags added I due to the text was possibly copied from a website, but it was not, first was no npov (did not meet), then confusing and unclear) and then notable, not too notable. The wikify was successful, I will add correct tags next time I need to add tags. Other, an IP editor began to make some changes in my userspace (little good, I choose to keep the changes) but then the IP began to vandalize.--Psl631 (talk · contribs) 19:52, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Your answer doesn't seem to make sense, and doesn't answer my questions. Because you don't seem to understand when maintenance tags are appropriate, I am giving you a restriction: do not add maintenance tags to articles. You are not allowed to add any maintenance tags to articles. If you add maintenance tags to articles, you will be blocked from editing. That is the only restriction I am making right now, but other admins might think that these changes are too disruptive and might make other restrictions or suggest a community ban. If this is not clear, please let me know. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Auntof6:Ok, I will not add any mainterance tags anymore to articles, unless the page has issues and needs one. If one is needed, can I let another editor add a tag to the article, but I will try to not add any wrong tags or I will be blocked from changing pages/banned from Wikimedia if I continue. Ok, NO more wrong tags or i will be blocked from changing pages on this Wikipedia. Even worser, will I be banned and this is possibly worser than a block. A block is simply prevent a user from changing pages, but the wiki is still readable, bans maybe EVEN worser than a block. (Questions, ask below) --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 20:16, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
That is not what Auntof6 said. Do not add any maintenance tags, at all, in any case. Vermont (talk) 20:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Vermont: Ok, NO more mainterance tags in articles. I can experiment with them in sandbox. --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 20:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
If you put tags on a sandbox please don't leave them there very long. That's because tags can add categories, and sandboxes don't belong in those categories. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I will NOT add any more mainterance tags to a page, including the sandbox.--Psl631 (talk · contribs) 05:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Ban proposal against you[change source]

This serves as formal notice that a community ban against you is being considered at WP:ST#Community ban proposal for Psl631. Thank you. Chenzw  Talk  05:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I can discuss the ban consideration on WP:ST, and many pings will occour, and please add talkback to notice me on this talk page. Thanks! --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 05:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Don't expect people to leave talkback messages here when they participate in the discussion. Instead, either keep checking that page yourself or add it to your watchlist so that you can see when someone comments there. Expecting people to go out of their way to notify you is one of the ways you have been disruptive here. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
@Auntof6:WP:ST is always in my watchlist, in the discussion, I can use {{ping}} and {{hidden ping}} templates to notify users instead of talkback templates. Again, User:Psl631/Scary will I want to have quickly deleted instead of kept. Questions, below. --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 05:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
I declined the QD on the "scary" page because it is referred to in the ban discussion. Please do not QD it until that discussion is finished. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Temporary Block pending community ban outcome[change source]

You continue to make questionable edits, and templates, after repeated warnings. All this while a community ban discussion is ongoing. I have blocked you for 1 week which should be about the time the community discussion ends. If you need to discuss or add information to your pending ban discussion, please add it here. This page will be the only page you can edit while you are blocked. Do not abuse this page, as this is the only way for you to discuss the ban proposal. Abusing this page will result in it being blocked from editing, and any further project disruption will not be tolerated. -- Enfcer (talk) 20:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I will discuss here my changes and what could be better, and it will occur many pings/replies to this page, I cannot add {{talkback}} as alternative while replying instead of pinging users, this page will be used to discuss here, and at he end of the block, I can continue revert vandalism. If i continue to make bad change, an infinite block will occur. I agree that i will NOT abuse this page or making unblock requests. I wait until this block expires and I can continue make good changes. OK --Psl631 (talk · contribs) 12:39, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Psl631, I have removed the block notice that you placed above Enfcer's message. It falsely represents his intentions. If the blocking administrator declines to issue you a templated block notice, then you do not get a templated block notice. Given your continued inability to exercise proper judgement, I am removing your ability to edit your own talk page. If you wish to discuss, defend, or otherwise add information to your pending ban discussion on ST, you will do it by email, either to any active administrator, or to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Your acknowledgement of this message is not required, and frankly, quite unwelcome. Chenzw  Talk  13:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)