User talk:ZenMaster9000

Quick deletion of deanism

The page you wrote, deanism, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 22:57, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Then I have the wrong name for this weird religion. A 12-year-old poet/prophet from Celtic England? 99 Deities coupled with both an impersonal life force and a twisted goddess? The LOTR as religious scripture? You may delete the page. My apologies, and please forgive me. ZenMaster9000 (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

User Page Alert

If you have read the contents in my User Page, please feel free to write an article about it. Just use the name of this entity (as long as it's not Paganism, Wicca, Druidism or the New Age). Thank you. ZenMaster9000 (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)ZenMaster9000

If the pantheon of my religion is named Mannon and the religion is named Menon, then how will it be differentiated from "Mennonite" as referring to the Anabaptist movement -- which includes the Amish? ZenMaster9000 (talk) 22:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC) ZenMaster9000

RfD nomination of Danu

An editor has requested deletion of Danu, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Danu and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 01:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

I am terribly sorry you feel this way. Wikipedia is obviously not a blog or Fandom Wiki. Besides, that's not the point. The point is to be honest and sincere with the content when allowing inclusion. For example, if I write an article on a world religion about Zen using my description, I have to prove it is not Zen Buddhism, a division of Mahayana Buddhism which in turn is a division of Buddhism. The usage of the term "New Age" for this faith may sound appealing, but some see it as an umbrella term or broad spectrum of beliefs. Please delete Danu as the term is not related to the faith. ZenMaster9000 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Organized Religion

I have done some research on the Eastern religions as described in the New Age and found them to be mutually exclusive to their sources. Many in the New Age have described Buddhism to be nontheistic, meaning no central deity (or deities) while a Buddhist source mentions a belief in God. Another example is Hinduism. New Age sources instate the Hindu faith to be one solid religion of the Vedas while Hindus refer to their faith as a "loosely organized" way of life. And those in the New Age itself? Selfless devotees are called Zen (with a long "E"), not to be confused with the Buddhist concept of Zen (with a short "E"). Along with such includes "Paganism" with gods described by their mortals as symbolic of the mind and literary characters, not to be "butt-ugly" idols of the Middle East. I think we must be clear on spiritual (or religious) ways of life.ZenMaster9000 (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)ZenMaster9000

By the way, there is no such thing as a "loosely organized" religion, nor is any religion "organized." Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity and the New Age are diverse in beliefs while Judaism, Islam, Taoism and the Baha'i Faith are concise (or unified).ZenMaster9000 (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)ZenMaster9000

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive changing. If you continue to vandalize pages by adding wrong information on purpose, as you did at New Age, you may be blocked from changing pages on Wikipedia. Griff (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey, dude, I'm telling the truth! I demand an apology. I demand you take back your statement or else I'll contact Wikipedia's administrator. You have three days to do this! ZenMaster9000 (talk) 19:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)ZenMaster9000

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from changing without any more warnings the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by adding wrong information on purpose. Griff (talk) 19:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh, shut up! Guys like you are making Wikipedia the worst online research encyclopedia! The administrator says it is made by guys like us all. But no, instead of being open to certain articles and being honest, you just put up what you want us to believe. I want Wikipedia deleted! ZenMaster9000 (talk) 19:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in line with Wikipedia's blocking policy for adding wrong information to articles. If you think this block is unfair, you may ask to be unblocked by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. Griff (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)