Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2021/February/Done

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Belwine[change source]

I know I have said before that rollback is not needed to revert vandalism, but when a user makes lots of bad edits, it takes quite a long time when reverting all of them using Twinkle and it would be quicker to rollback. Also, there are situations when a diff isn't needed to see that the last user who edited the page was vandalising (see my talk page history today..), it would be quicker to use rollback instead of going to history, clicking on the diff and pressing vandalism. Rollback would assist me in my anti-vandalism activities. I have read through WP:Rollback feature and I am aware that rollback should not ever be used for good-faith edits - Twinkle or normal undo can be used for those. Thank you for your consideration, and, obviously, feel free to ask any questions. --Belwine💬📜 20:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support as per his performance.DJRC (talk) 07:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but just a reminder that requests for rollback are not votes --Belwine💬📜 09:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know just think this is an (Non-administrator observation) and suggestion.DJRC (talk) 13:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok, just mark comments using {{nao}} in the future :) Belwine💬📜 13:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I would request any admin to check this since no comments has been made earlier.DJRC (talk) 10:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Everything looks fine to me. My apologies for the wait. Hiàn (talk) 01:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]