Wikipedia:Deletion review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
WP:RFU
WP:DRV
WP:RFU

If you think a review of a deletion discussion is needed, please list it here and say why. Users can then comment to reach an agreement on whether the community thinks the discussion was closed correctly, or the decision should be overturned. Each user can say if he or she wants to endorse the closure, or overturn the closure, with a brief comment, and sign with ~~~~.

A page should stay listed here for at least 5 to 7 days. After that time, an administrator will decide if there is a consensus (agreement) about what to do, and take appropriate steps. If the consensus was that the discussion was closed correctly, the discussion should be closed with a note saying this.

Archived requests are here

Current requests[change | change source]

Please list newer requests at the top.

I don't think my article Schematic should be deleted. I am a student who has learned about schematics and worked hard in creating this article. If you think this page should be deleted can you please explain why or how I can improve this article. Thanks User:Rus793 and User:Auntof6 thanks for helping! 5df4smscm6 (talk) 16:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@5df4smscm6: The only content in the page was a description of who you are and what you planned to write. Neither of those is appropriate on an article page. Since there was no content on the page, the page was deleted. Later it was recreated as a redirect to Electrical circuit. You are welcome to either improve that article or write the schematic article with appropriate content. You might want to work on it in a sandbox under your user account until it is ready to be in mainspace. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)