Talk:Theresa May

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Theresa May article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is about a person who is alive, and so it must follow our rules for biographies of living persons. Controversial content about living persons that does not have any sources or is poorly sourced must be removed straight away from the article and its talk page, especially if it harms their reputation. If such content is repeatedly added to the page or if there are other concerns related to this rule, report it on the Administrators' noticeboard.

Daily article pageviews

Graphs do not work. You can go to the graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org.

This article contains a translation of Theresa May from en.wikipedia.

Split out Cabinet[change source]

@TDKR Chicago 101: Hi. You've been doing a good job on this. Thanks.

I'm thinking the cabinet table needs to be split into its own article, not unlike en:Cabinet of the United Kingdom. What do you think? StevenJ81 (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment, this is the page people would look at. I would keep the Cabinet list for a week or two, then set it up as a stand-alone page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

styles of address[change source]

Not "Mrs Philip May", please. We don't use that archaic style in this country any more, and have not done so for at least forty years. In any event, we should only list formal changes unless the individual person has signalled a desire to be different. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since then the phrase "nasty party" has crept back in. What she meant at the time was perhaps that the Conservative party was seen as hostile towards people with disabilities, as well as other people who are vulnerable. Of course it is not, and no political party could afford to be. Address all political parties with respect. You cannot have a neutral encyclopaedia if you keep violating neutrality. Address all parties with respect, especially when an election is near. I could say the same about presidential elections in the U.S.A. We are not here to make personal remarks and take positions. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

in what way can we refuse what we have, while keeping the basic info? Eptalon (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]