User:S2697157/Sandbox

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leiden University, History of the Modern Middle East, 2021-22

Mu Sa (s2697157) and Elif are students enrolled in the course above, whose assessment entails editing a Simple Wikipedia entry. I will be using the space below to draft this entry.

*Since March until 14th of April, we have worked on the project contents through a shared google documents, thus here has no previous editing history.


Background[change | change source]

Situation in Iraq[change | change source]

Ba'ath ideology and Iraqi demographics[change | change source]

In the middle of the 20th century, the Ba'ath parties were ruling both in Syria and Iraq.[1] The ideology behind Ba'athism is to unite the Arab regions and create a Pan-Arab state. The ideology is also oriented towards socialism. Although the Ba'ath ideology has nationalist roots and is not related to religion, Ba'ath leaders and politicians have often used religious outlets to gain popularity and support of the people.[1] Although the Pan-Arab nationalism worked out in other Arab countries such as Egypt, this was a difficult case in Iraq. The reason for this, is the diversity of the Iraqi population. Because of the Sunni- Shi'a and Arab-Kurd divide, Iraq is seen as one of the most difficult countries to govern.[2] It was especially difficult, as the Ba'ath party was dominantly Sunni, whereas the population of Iraq, the origin place of Shia Islam, is dominantly Shia (55%).[3] The president of Iraq at the time, was Saddam Hussein, who took most of the power in his own hands and strived for strong Arab leadership. His ambitions to take the lead in the Arab world were also a key element for his later attack on Iran.[4]

Shatt el-Arab flowing into the Persian Gulf on the south border between Iraq and Iran

Shatt al-Arab[change | change source]

The Shatt al-Arab waterway, bordering Iraq and Iran, is crucial to Iraq, because it is its only major outlet to the sea.[5] The waterway is controlled by Iraq and has been a source of tension between the states long before the Iranian revolution. The main reason for tension around this waterway, has been its function as a border. Because of this, it has been an issue all the way between the Ottomans and Iran. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, the waterway was controlled by Iraq.[6] However, in 1969 Shah Reza refused to pay fees for Iranian ships passing the waterway.[1] He also started backing up Kurdish separatists groups in Northern Iraq. In order to stop the support of Iran to the Kurds, Saddam signed the Algiers agreement in 1975. Iran stopped supporting the Kurds, and the border was placed in the middle of the waterway. One of the reasons, according to Saddam himself, in being pressured to signing this agreement, was the millitary advancement of Iran during the rule of the Shah.[5] Saddam withdrew the agreement several days before invading Iran, in september 1980, drawing upon the importance of the waterway.[4] Before and during the war Saddam was vocal about the right of Iraq to Shatt al-Arab as well as Khuzestan, the bordering Iranian region that is mainly inhabited by Iranian Arabs.[4]

Threat of the Iranian revolution[change | change source]

The Pan-Islamic nature of the new Iranian state was in contrast with the Arab nationalist context of Iraq.[5] After the establishment of an Islamic Republic in Iran, the secular yet authoritarian rule of Hussein felt threatened.[4] A large Persian state posed a threat against the Pan-Arab ideology of Hussein. The Shia muslims in Iraq were already posing a threat to Saddam, by protesting and mobilising against the Ba'ath regime. This only became worse after the Iranian revolutionaries called upon Iraqis to also initiate a revolution.[4] Other than these political threats, Iraq was at a more fragile position geographically.

Situation in Iran[change | change source]

The Iranian revolution[change | change source]

In Iran, the Pahlavi Dynasty had been ruling since 1925, after the overthrow of the Qajar Dynasty.[7] The Pahlavi empire aimed to create a westernised and progressive Iranian state. The second and last monarch, Shah Mohammed Reza, started implementing bolder reforms that affected the daily lives of the citizens.[7] As a reaction, opposition from all parts of society began growing. Especially clergymen were encouraging the people to stand up against westernisation and strive for an Islamic state ruled by Islamic jurists.[7] Khomeini was one of the leading clerics during the period of political tension. In 1977, these tensions led to large scale demonstrations and eventually the exile of the Shah. In 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran was officially established, headed by Ayatollah Khomeini.[7] This sudden turn of events in Iran came as a surprise to most countries. The rise of a shia power caused concerns in several surrounding countries. Especially in Iraq, where the Shia majority was ruled by the Sunni minority.[3] It was not only the rise to power of clerics that was concerning. Khomeini and his counterparts were also vocal about their desires for creating islamic states in the surrounding muslim-majority countries as well. The ultimate goal was to create a united Pan-Islamic state under Khomeini's rule.[6]

Military power[change | change source]

Shah Mohammed Reza had actually invested a lot into the modernisation of the Iranian army. He was fully backed by the United States, as they supported the anti-communist stance of Iran and saw this as a opportunity to have a state that supported US interests in that region.[5] Thus, the Shah expanded navy, air and ground forces with modern weapons and imported western trainers for the army. For this reason, Iran became more capable than Iraq, also taking into account the army officers that were almost twice as many is Iraq.[5] However, the revolution changed this military upper-hand drastically. The revolutionaries did not understand the need for extensive arm supplies and did not want to be the policeman for the US. Therefore, Khomeini and his reign immediately canceled military contracts and sent away the western trainers. Because of the sudden regime change, the morale of the officers also lowered significantly according to Iraqi intelligence at the time. A parallel military force was created by Khomeini, as the previous officers became dangers of a potential counterrevolution.[5] All of these factors caused Iran to remain with a limited military force.

The war[change | change source]

Iraqi invasion[change | change source]

Start of the invasion[change | change source]

On september 22nd, 1982, Iraq invaded Iran. Hussein was confident that the invasion would move swiftly, as the Iraqi army was well equipped thanks to Saddam's investments in the military.[5] However, Saddam did not take into account that advanced arms did not mean an improved military capability.[5] Hussein also believed in a quick win, relying on the intelligence reports stating that the Iranian army was mostly inefficient since the revolution.[5] Another reason for Iran to be a weak opponent in the eyes of Iraq, was the fact that no other state supported them, because of their alienating ideology. On the other hand, it would later become clear that this invasion would also benefit Khomeini, by allowing him to eliminate his opposers and uniting his nation for national defence.[5] At the centre of Iraq's objectives was the annexation of the East Bank of the Shaat Al-Arab waterway which had been the site of numerous border skirmishes between the two countries going back to the late 1960s. The president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, also wanted to annex the Iranian province of Khuzestan, substantially populated by Iranian Arabs.[8]

Offensive battles[change | change source]

Iraq mobilized a large number of aircraft to carry out air strikes on 15 cities and air bases in Iran, including the capital Tehran. Beginning in March 1982, Iranian forces shifted to the counter-offensive. On 29 June 1982[9], Iraq announced that it had withdrawn its forces from the occupied Iranian territory and the border between the two countries was restored to its pre-war status. Iranian defenses are focused on the northern front to block the main routes and delay the Iraqi army's advance. Iran blocked the momentum of the Iraqi offensive and gradually seized the initiative in the war. In September 1981, Iran launched a major counteroffensive. At the end of September, the Iraqi siege of Abadan was lifted with the launch of a major Abadan counter-offensive. On April 20, Iran again concentrated the forces of nearly three divisions and a large number of revolutionary Guards about 100,000, launched the "Jerusalem Al-Quds Operation" offensive in order to recover the city of Khorramshahr. After 25 days of fierce fighting, the city of Khorramshahr, an important port city in the south, was finally recaptured. On 10 June, Iraq proposed and unilaterally implemented a cease-fire, announced that it recognized the continued validity of the Algiers Agreement signed by the two countries in 1975 and was ready to negotiate with Iran on the basis of the recognition of Iraq's fundamental rights. [9]

1988 was the year when the Iran-Iraq War took a turning point. Between February and April, the two sides used hundreds of missiles to strike each other's towns, unleashing a "city assault" on an unprecedented scale. [9]

Aftermath[change | change source]

End of the war[change | change source]

The War lasted for 7 years 11 months (from September 22, 1980 to August 20, 1988), and successively experienced four strategic stages: Iraq's attack, Iran's counter-attack, Iran-Iraq stalemate and Iraq's counter-attack[10]. The two sides are inflexible and demanding too high a price for a truce. And Iran planned to use up the entire country's resource to participant the war, their insistence on playing the long game emboldened by its vast population and religious fanaticism.

The Iran-Iraq War was one of the longest wars of the 20th century. It was a veritable war of attrition, a pyrrhic war with no victor for either side. Before the war, Iraq had foreign exchange reserves of us $37 billion. At the end of the war, its foreign debt was over US $70 billion, of which over US $40 billion was arms debt owed to western countries and the Soviet Union, and over US $30 billion was loans owed to other Arab countries.

Iraq suffered 180,000 deaths, 250,000 injuries, and $350 billion in direct losses (including military expenditures, war damage and economic losses). Iran also owes $45 billion in foreign debt, has 350,000 deaths and more than 700,000 injuries, and 200,000 women in Tehran alone have lost their husbands; Direct losses of $300 billion. The war has set back the economic development plans of both countries by at least 20 to 30 years. The war took a heavy toll on both countries, halting economic growth, plummeting oil exports and killing millions. As a result, Iraq has also been saddled with a large debt, amounting to $14 billion for Kuwait alone. That was one of the reasons Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait[11].

At the end of the war, the national boarder line between the two countries was restored to the pre-war situation.

Postwar situation[change | change source]

The mediation of the international community failed several times. Iran and Iraq did not accept the mediation of the United Nations until July 1988, and the formal armistice ended in August. From the perspective of international factors, the the US and the Soviet Union's interference doomed the war to be inconclusive and protracted from the very beginning, which restricted meaningful outcome, and caused unjustifiable long-lasting social and political problems.

The United States and the Soviet Union happened to have the similar position on the Iran-Iraq War: they both adopted the policy of neutrality and balance of power and tried to maintain the balance of power on both sides. They both wooed and suppressed Iran, but there were differences in tactics. Both Iraq and Iran are located in the Gulf region, which is extremely important in the global strategy of the United States and the Soviet Union. Although the United States and the Soviet Union declared to be neutral and not directly involved in the gulf region, in fact, they grouped up with their allies took advantage of the opportunity of the war to step up the competition in the Gulf region and squeeze out each other for their own national benefit[12].

Other Facts[change | change source]

The Iran-Iraq War is an international interpretation of this war, and it has various titles depends on the country. It is known in Iran as the‘Iraqi Invasion[13]', 'the Holy War of Resistance', or 'the Iranian Revolutionary War[14]', and in Iraq ‘Saddam Hussein's Qadisiah’. The war essentially was an eight-year direct military conflict between Iran and Iraq.

When both countries stuck in progresses on battlefield, they decided to sabotage supply convoys of each other, many ships from other countries suffered from casualties. As the Iran-Iraq ship attack affected the interests of non-belligerent countries, Kuwait in November and December 1986, the United States, the Soviet Union, China, France and the United Kingdom, the five permanent members of the United Nations, proposed to charter ships and escort requirements.

Both Iraq and Iran suffered heavy losses in the war. In addition to conventional warfares, they paid extra effort to destroying the enemy's logistics and economic facilities by attacking cities, ships and oil fields. Records also reported that chemical weapons were utilized against civilians.

References[change | change source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Razoux, Pierre (2015). The Iran-Iraq War. Nicholas Elliott. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN 978-0-674-91570-1. OCLC 934433836.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  2. Hassan, Hamdi A. (1999). The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait : religion, identity, and otherness in the analysis of war and conflict. London: Pluto Press. ISBN 978-1-84964-037-4. OCLC 51008604.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Nilsson, Marco (2018-01). "Causal beliefs and war termination: Religion and rational choice in the Iran–Iraq War". Journal of Peace Research. 55 (1): 94–106. doi:10.1177/0022343317730120. ISSN 0022-3433. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Asadzade, Peyman (2019-06-25). "War and Religion: The Iran−Iraq War". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.812. Retrieved 2022-05-18.
  5. 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 Woods, Kevin M.; Murray, Williamson, eds. (2014), "The opponents", The Iran–Iraq War: A Military and Strategic History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–84, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449794.005, ISBN 978-1-107-06229-0, retrieved 2022-05-18
  6. 6.0 6.1 MARINE CORPS COMMAND AND STAFF COLL QUANTICO VA, & Cruze, G. S. (1988, januari). Iran and Iraq: Perspectives in Conflict. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA493328
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Anderson, B.S. (2016). A History of the Modern Middle East: Rulers, Rebels and Rogues. Stanford: Stanford University Press. pp. 510–612, 896–997. ISBN 9780804798754.
  8. Lahijani, Alireza Shams (2016-05). "The Iran-Iraq War. By Pierre Razoux and translated by Nicholas Elliott". International Affairs. 92 (3): 746–747. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12632. ISSN 0020-5850. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Murray, Williamson; Woods, Kevin M., "Timeline", The Iran–Iraq War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 344–347, retrieved 2022-05-18
  10. 杨, 明星 (2005). "试论两伊战争及其遗产" (PDF). 阿拉伯世界. 97: 49–52.
  11. "新华网_让新闻离你更近". www.xinhuanet.com. Retrieved 2022-05-11.
  12. Lahijani, Alireza Shams (2016-05). "The Iran-Iraq War. By Pierre Razoux and translated by Nicholas Elliott". International Affairs. 92 (3): 746–747. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12632. ISSN 0020-5850. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. Murray, Williamson (2014). The Iran-Iraq War : a military and strategic history. Kevin M. Woods. New York. ISBN 978-1-107-06229-0. OCLC 877852628.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  14. EL-Azhary, M. (2012-05-23). "The Iran-Iraq War (RLE Iran A)". doi:10.4324/9780203833223. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)