Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Discussed deletion[change | change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}} to the top of the page.
  2. Please use a change summary such as "nominated for deletion".
  3. Save the page.
  4. You can also check the "Watch this page" box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you to know if the RfD tag is removed.
Create a discussion page.
  1. On the box that has appeared at the top of the article, click the link to create a discussion page.
  2. Type the page name and the reason you are requesting deletion in the right places.


List it here
  1. Look at the discussion page you have just made, and follow the instructions in the red box.
  2. Once you have done that, you may wish to remove that tag.

Quick deletion[change | change source]

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change | change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|<page to be deleted>}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change | change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change | change source]

Pohang[change | change source]

Pohang (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copyright infringement, lack of attribution Rus793 (talk) 02:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Comment. We still do not have a mandate as to whether we are going to enforce QD:G12, copyright violations against articles that do not have attribution. This is after repeated notifications of the originator to comply with the attribution policy. I don' t believe three is any question it is a legal requirement or that it is a copyright violation. Rus793 (talk) 02:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Fábio Coentrão[change | change source]

Fábio Coentrão (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copyright violation, no attribution Rus793 (talk) 02:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Comment. We still do not have a mandate as to whether we are going to enforce QD:G12, copyright violations against articles that do not have attribution. This is after repeated notifications of the originator to comply with the attribution policy. I don' t believe three is any question it is a legal requirement or that it is a copyright violation. Rus793 (talk) 02:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Real Madrid Castilla[change | change source]

Real Madrid Castilla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copyright violation, no attribution Rus793 (talk) 02:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Comment. We still do not have a mandate as to whether we are going to enforce QD:G12, copyright violations against articles that do not have attribution. This is after repeated notifications of the originator to comply with the attribution policy. I don' t believe three is any question it is a legal requirement or that it is a copyright violation. Rus793 (talk) 02:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of flags of the Nguyen dynasty's administrative units[change | change source]

List of flags of the Nguyen dynasty's administrative units (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability; subject too specific, belongs as section in Nguyễn Dynasty article, if and when it comes over, same as it is at enwiki. Rus793 (talk) 17:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Keep Article is simple and notable. That is all that is required. We don't have any regulation on how specific something is. -DJSasso (talk) 18:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment. I don’t see how notability can be established based on a single web source that does not meet WP:V. It is a web blog that says it is “all personal opinion” in the first paragraph. Nothing here shows “significant coverage in reliable sources”. I think the narrowness in scope of this article is the main problem in finding reliable source citations. Returning this to the originator’s sandbox for more verification would be another option. Rus793 (talk) 12:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
  • The article also has a printed source, remember we don't require web sources. Flags of administrative units (aka states, provinces etc) are clearly notable. But I am more than willing to be convinced otherwise. Didn't notice he also created the en version. -DJSasso (talk) 12:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
  • There are three items listed under the references section. The first is an inline source citation to a web blog which clearly does not meet WP:RS or WP:N. The second is a general reference to a print source. I’m not able to verify this source, but AGF and on face value, it is an acceptable source even though we can't know what facts in the article it is being used to cite. The third is an external link to the same web blog, just a different page. That adds up to one acceptable source citation, which is not significant coverage. I didn’t notice if the same editor created the en version, but he did copy-paste another article on Flags of Vietnam that was much better sourced. Again, returning it to the originator’s sandbox would give the editor the opportunity to find more reliable sources. Rus793 (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - Clear notability, supported by multiple sources, as well as a printed source. Taking into account what Rus said, the sources should be improved and worked on in a Sandbox. George.Edward.C (talk) (contribs) 12:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The Book of Life (movie)[change | change source]

The Book of Life (movie) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP; CRYSTAL; notability Rus793 (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Strong keep: The movie is expected to come out in October 2014. That's a short time from today. Please keep the article; the movie may become much more notable after its release. Angela Maureen (talk) 11:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes, but it's not out, and there is no evidence about it. What's more, as its originator, you are not exactly an unbiased witness. It's not notable at all now. Macdonald-ross (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Keep: This film is notable, an article exists on the English Wikipedia. More details would likely be added as production progresses. If it has to be notable now, it should be deleted. George.Edward.C (talk) (contribs) 14:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment First, the subject of an article has to be notable now, not potentially notable in the future, and notability needs to be shown. Second, the fact that enwiki has an article does not show notability and is not an argument for having an article here. --Auntof6 (talk) 14:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete: as too soon, per policy. Fylbecatulous talk 14:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Butters' Bottom Bitch[change | change source]

Butters' Bottom Bitch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CRRaysHead90 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No claim to the individual episode's notability, per WP:GNG and WP:EPISODE. The Google Test shows 409k results, however, when looking through the first few pages, most seem to be unreliable sources and places to watch/buy the episode (regardless of legality of doing so). CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 11:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Keep. Well, I think it's notable, and En has it as a GA. The evidence for its notability is in the En article under "Reception" Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Keep - Notable [as Macdonald pointed out], however the quality of the article needs to be worked on. May I suggest a similar format to articles in the same category George.Edward.C (talk) (contribs) 11:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 11:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change | change source]

None at this time

Requests on hold pending discussion about deleting user pages[change | change source]

The following requests are on hold pending the results of a discussion at Wikipedia:Simple talk#Deletion of userpages.... If you have comments about the general idea of deleting user pages, you may comment there.


User:The Three Headed Knight/Flag/Country data Cambodia[change | change source]

User:The Three Headed Knight/Flag/Country data Cambodia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Stale user draft not edited since it was created in July 2010. User hasn't edited since September 2011. Auntof6 (talk) 08:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]


This request is due to close on 08:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Shakinglord/WikiProject Gemology[change | change source]

User:Shakinglord/WikiProject Gemology (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WikiProject with no information. Not changed since it was created in December 2011. Hosting user hasn't edited since February 2012. Auntof6 (talk) 07:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Delete. This one has little content; states it is under construction and has no further activity since December 2011. Appears abandoned. Fylbecatulous talk 10:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. As abandoned project. Rus793 (talk) 12:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. This one has no content. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Project/France[change | change source]

User:Project/France (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WikiProject page under User:Project with no info on it. No meaningful changes since it was created in October 2010. Auntof6 (talk) 07:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

This request is due to close on 07:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Arsenalkid700/Milton Bhowmick[change | change source]

User:Arsenalkid700/Milton Bhowmick (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Stale user draft. Not edited since it was created in July 2012. Auntof6 (talk) 07:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]


This request is due to close on 07:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Arsenalkid700/Mehtab Hossain[change | change source]

User:Arsenalkid700/Mehtab Hossain (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Stale user draft. Not edited since it was created in June 2012. Auntof6 (talk) 07:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]


This request is due to close on 07:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Arsenalkid700/Harry Wright[change | change source]

User:Arsenalkid700/Harry Wright (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Stale user draft. Not edited since it was created in June 2012. Auntof6 (talk) 06:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]


This request is due to close on 06:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Arsenalkid700/2012-13 Pune F.C. season[change | change source]

User:Arsenalkid700/2012-13 Pune F.C. season (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Stale user draft. Not edited by creator since it was created in June 2012. Auntof6 (talk) 06:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]


This request is due to close on 06:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Project/Collaboration[change | change source]

User:Project/Collaboration (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Inactive WikiProject under User:Project with no meaningful project-related changes since September 2009. Marked as historical since July 2012, but I don't see the need to keep the history.

This request includes the following related pages:

Note to closing admin: this request includes the main project page and two other pages which are listed above. Auntof6 (talk) 05:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Delete. Originally supported by some highly notable editors, but a long time not active. Macdonald-ross (talk)
  • Delete. As an abandoned project. Rus793 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 05:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Andrew from NC/WikiProject Christianity[change | change source]

User:Andrew from NC/WikiProject Christianity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apparently inactive WikiProject hosted by a user who hasn't edited since March 2010. Project page has no meaningful project-related edits since December 2009.

This request includes the following page, which is the userbox for the project:

Note to closing admin: This request includes the main page and the userbox page, which is listed above. Auntof6 (talk) 04:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Delete. Per above. Rus793 (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. In effect, it ran from 2008 to 2010, so it has been dead four years. Many of its objectives were met. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 04:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Tanthanyes/Wikiproject Chemistry[change | change source]

User:Tanthanyes/Wikiproject Chemistry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apparently inactive WikiProject hosted by a user who hasn't edited since June 2008. Last meaningful project-related edit was in October 2011. This request includes the following related pages:

Note to closing admin: This request includes the main page and three related pages, which are listed above. Auntof6 (talk) 04:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • If we were to have a chemistry project little of this would be of use. Editor has been gone a long time, so I vote for delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per nom. Rus793 (talk) 12:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 04:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Tofutwitch11/WikiProject Aviation[change | change source]

User:Tofutwitch11/WikiProject Aviation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apparently inactive WikiProject hosted by user who hasn't edited since December 2011. The project page has had no project-related edits since November 2010. The only project member listed is the host. No userbox that I could find. Auntof6 (talk) 03:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Project with no members, and effectively dead. Delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per nom. Rus793 (talk) 12:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 03:21, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Alexhl/WikiProject[change | change source]

User:Alexhl/WikiProject (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apparently inactive WikiProject (Asian music) hosted by user who hasn't edited since May 2008.

Also included in this request are these two subpages:

The userbox has no links to it. There have been no edits to any of these pages since 2008.

Note to closing admin: Please note that this request includes three pages. They are the project page and its two subpages, listed above. Auntof6 (talk) 03:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change | change source]

  • Delete. Per nom. Rus793 (talk) 02:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. A dead project since 2008. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 03:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Related pages[change | change source]