I have continued to make sure that I provide explanations for all of the edits that I revert. My last request failed because of a lack of communication after reverting edits (since I wasn't using Twinkle at the time). Since then I've familiarized myself with the various warning and user messaging tools it provides, and always leave behind appropriate messages (edit test messages, vandal/blanking warnings, etc.) when performing undos. Link to User talk namespace edits here, where post-undo messages are mostly those labelled with (TW). Brantmeierz (talk) 01:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done I see evidence of a dedicated editor learning the nuances of this project and making headway. @Brantmeierz: continue to ensure you communciate with editors (both registered and IP) why you do certain things. Operator873talkconnect21:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Reopening of failed RfP, but now with more experience. In seriousness, I've been working on being more active in more than just anti-vandalism, but also page and template creation, RfD voting, and (attempted) bot creation; almost doubling my edit count from my first request. Again, here are some useful links if you have any questions, and you can also ask me on here or my talk page. Thanks. rollingbarrels (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done I see evidence of a dedicated editor learning the nuances of this project and making headway. @Brantmeierz: continue to ensure you communciate with editors (both registered and IP) why you do certain things. Operator873talkconnect 21:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)