Wikipedia:Requests for deletion
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]
Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
- A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
- The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
- The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
- Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- B. Carry out these checks
- Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
- If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
- Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
- Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
- Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
- Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
- C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
- If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
- If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
- If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
{{notability}}
,{{hoax}}
,{{original research}}
, or{{advert}}
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it. - If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
- If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
- If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.
Discussed deletion[change source]
- Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
- In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
- Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
- You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
- Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
- Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
- Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
- At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
- {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
- Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion[change source]
If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.
Notifying the user[change source]
Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions[change source]
- The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
- Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
- Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
- Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
*
and sign after your comment by adding~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one*
). - New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
- Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
- Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put
<s>
before your old idea and</s>
after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Deletekeep". - If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
- Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
- Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:
- A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
- Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
- All times are in UTC.
Current deletion request discussions[change source]
Into the Moat[change source]
- Into the Moat (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Quick Delete A4. No claim of notability in the article.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Victoria Paris[change source]
- Victoria Paris (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable porn actress, Deleted at EN because of notability issues, Fails PORNBIO and GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 22:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kendra Lust[change source]
- Kendra Lust (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable porn actress, Deleted at EN due to notability, Fails en:WP:PORNBIO and GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 22:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Calamba City Hospital[change source]
- Calamba City Hospital (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:NHOSPITAL - note this is different from w:Calamba Medical Center on en. --Ferien (talk) 15:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 15:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Saquico[change source]
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced and lacking in content. Rathfelder (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 13:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Richard Poole (character)[change source]
- Richard Poole (character) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Merge into List of Death in Paradise characters Rathfelder (talk) 13:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 13:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Orospu[change source]
Yottie has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page is a dicdef for a word from another language. Cannot see how this is notable. Yottie =talk= 12:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 12:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mother 3 fan translation[change source]
- Mother 3 fan translation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Should merge with Mother 3 Rathfelder (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Merge into Mother 3 per nom. Perfect as a section, not as an article.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Argentina football squad 1928 Summer Olympics[change source]
- Template:Argentina football squad 1928 Summer Olympics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused navbox over one year old with only one blue link in the body. The purpose of a navbox is to allow easy navigation between related articles. If there's only one article, it can't serve that purpose and the navbox isn't useful. Auntof6 (talk) 10:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete per nom, Not serving any sort of purpose due to the redlinks, Suppose they could be created but footballers aren't my thing, Delete. –Davey2010Talk 20:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Humphrey Goodman (character)[change source]
- Humphrey Goodman (character) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not very notable. Already in List of Death in Paradise characters Rathfelder (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 10:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Endorsements in the 2022 Los Angeles Mayoral Election[change source]
- Endorsements in the 2022 Los Angeles Mayoral Election (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Just a list. No context or explanation. Rathfelder (talk) 10:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Article created by an editor who only did a few politics-related ones, and woh stopped editing in summer 2023. In its current state, the article should likely be deleted, it only list endorsments for one candadate, as a list with references, but without explanation. I am not into US politics. Getting a title like that I'd at least expect several candidates, and some explanatory text, and not just a bare listing with references.So...delete --Eptalon (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Enemy of the state[change source]
- Enemy of the state (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This could be enlarged. There is quite a lot more that could be said. Rathfelder (talk) 09:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 04:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Buck Wild[change source]
Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is poorly written, and it is about a single character in sequels of the Ice Age series of movies. It has an excessively long summary, and it has no sources. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 09:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 09:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Barron Hilton II[change source]
- Barron Hilton II (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. No significant roles, sourcs mainly mention family members, not article subject. Another Vanderpumpstan sock mess. Ravensfire (talk) 03:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete per nom - being a celebs son doesn't grant you a free pass to an article, Hasn't contributed anything worthwhile to the acting industry, Fails NOTINHERITED, NACTOR and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 20:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 03:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
John J. Collett[change source]
- John J. Collett (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another Vanderpumpstan mess. Not enough here to show that WP:GNG is met. Sources are about his shooting or focus on his wife. Not notable. Ravensfire (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 03:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Monty Brinson[change source]
- Monty Brinson (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough to show that WP:GNG is met. Sources mainly mention his wife, not him. Ravensfire (talk) 03:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 03:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Dylan Corbett-Bader[change source]
- Dylan Corbett-Bader (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Relatively unknown actor without significant roles. Main claim to notability is from relatives, but notability is not inherited. Sources are generally passing mentions at best. Ravensfire (talk) 03:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 03:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Attempt[change source]
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Neutral - EN has an article (en:Attempt) and I had preview-added the lead from EN and simplified it however it still felt like it failed DICDEF so gave up, I want to say Keep but my version would still result in it sounding like a dictionary definition, –Davey2010Talk 20:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
OneStream Live[change source]
- OneStream Live (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Angerxiety has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not look notable, some sources are primary sources, others I am not sure the reliability of. Seems to fail WP:GNG – Angerxiety! 11:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Keep I think it is notable, some sources are Reliable User:Macdonald-ross --Skymansky3 (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Hi hope you can see this article and check news @User:Macdonald-ross [1]https://www.producthunt.com/products/onestream and [2]https://medium.com/onestream/onestream-live-news-update-new-version-6-0-3-f1466214eb13 [3]https://www.producthunt.com/products/onestream [4]https://appsumo.com/products/onestream-live/#overview
- [5]https://www.trustpilot.com/review/onestream.live [6]https://www.99signals.com/onestream-live-review/ [7]https://www.chargebee.com/customers/onestreamlive/ Skymansky3 (talk) 08:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Skymansky3;
- Cite 1 is an overview page
- Cite 2 is a paid-for-ad
- Cite 3 is a duplicate of Cite 1
- Cite 4 is a paid-to-promote ad
- Cite 5 is a review site
- Cite 6 is a "review" but it screams paid-to-promote
- Cite 7 is a clear as day paid-to-promote
- So respectfully these are just as poor as what's in the article if not worse. Could you also please stop pinging Macdonald-ross I'm sure they don't want to be notified every time you comment here, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 12:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- (Note) The editor is CU-blocked/locked. MathXplore (talk) 08:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Respectfully thinking and being notable are 2 seperate things, There's nothing on Google News[8] or the main Google Results page either, Sources in the article are mediocre, No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 20:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- some sources are primary sources and promotional but some are independent and quite detailed. Lack of presence in Google - in English - does not demonstrate lack of notability for something with a name using words in common use. Rathfelder (talk) 12:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- The sources in the article are all either from OSL themselves, review sites, or paid-for-ads - Some of the examples of terminology are extreme;
- "This feature-rich streaming studio allows you to invite multiple guests, add creative overlays, and customize backgrounds. It is where professionalism meets creativity, making your live streams not just broadcasts but memorable experiences.",[9]
- "OneStream Live emerges as the frontrunner, providing a robust cloud-based solution that empowers businesses and brands to schedule and live stream their content across more than 45 social platforms and the web. As a leading player in the industry, OneStream Live has not only mastered the art of live video streaming but has also revealed the secrets to harnessing its potential for business success.",[10]
- OneStream Live stands out with its easy-to-use interface, efficient scheduling, and many customizable and dynamic features. It is more than just a tool; it is a holistic solution for anyone seeking to enhance their streaming journey and bring their content to greater levels. Dive into the world of multichannel streaming with OneStream Live and discover the untapped potential of your online presence.,[11]
- "OneStream Live offers four intuitive solutions to cater to the needs of content creators from across different industries and niches.",[12]
- For me it sounds like these have been copypasted from the OSL website and thus for me scream "I've been paid to promote this product",
- That all being said I think the Geekflare review is fine, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Rathfelder you are right , what is your vote here thanks for your info , note , @Davey2010 I didn't do paid edit for this page– I enjoyed the services.
and then Gathered sources to write the article accordingly. Skymansky3 (talk) 13:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)- This isnt a vote. But I see no objection to review sites. Where else would we get information about stuff like this? Rathfelder (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- The sources in the article are all either from OSL themselves, review sites, or paid-for-ads - Some of the examples of terminology are extreme;
- some sources are primary sources and promotional but some are independent and quite detailed. Lack of presence in Google - in English - does not demonstrate lack of notability for something with a name using words in common use. Rathfelder (talk) 12:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
::::I think we have all sites and information @Rathfelder Skymansky3 (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)- From reputable independent reliable sources?, I use reputable website-reviews for everything (example Jason Statham#Movie list but TrustPilot obviously cannot be used and as I said the rest above for me scream paid promotion but that's just my opinion, If yourself or others believe the sources are fine and establish notability then that's fine too :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback @Davey2010 Skymansky3 (talk) 14:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just to note the article creator (Skymansky3) has been meta-locked and has been evading various previous meta locks too so I've struck their comments above. I guess technically the article could be deleted under G5 but as someone above believes this may be notable I haven't CSD'd it, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 08:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Tyler Antonıus[change source]
- Tyler Antonıus (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to Fails WP:GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - Per nom. Yottie =talk= 21:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Tyler Antonius and Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler Antonius for previous discussions. MathXplore (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, also the cute trick with the name to avoid the protected page shows it's just a promotional spammer. Multiple elements are fake (he did not get nominated for a Grammy for Best New Artist, he is not married to Alessia Cara, etc). This is someone's fantasy and should be deleted. Ravensfire (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete - This page has been deleted multiple times as seen here: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=delete&user=&page=Tyler+Antonius&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslist&useskin=vector-2022 MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 00:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
51 Trouble Hoover Crip[change source]
- 51 Trouble Hoover Crip (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 15:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - Per nom. Yottie =talk= 21:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
2026 Moto2 World Championship[change source]
- 2026 Moto2 World Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not necessary to have an article for event held in 2026, WP:NOTCRYSTAL A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete per nom and per Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/2026 MotoGP World Championship, In previous nominations I had suggested redirecting but It was deemed best to delete instead, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 09:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree with the above. Yottie =talk= 21:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 04:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Windlehurst School[change source]
- Windlehurst School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Also worth noting en:Windlesham House School is a completely different school, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 09:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable. Yottie =talk= 21:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 04:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Blood Brothers (musical)[change source]
- Blood Brothers (musical) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Essay, not an article, no claim to notability Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- I disagree with the no claim to notability part. However, the page is clearly written as a personal analysis (according to the change summary, as a GCSE project), and not an encyclopaedia article. Best case scenario, we rewrite the article and keep. In its current state, delete. Yottie =talk= 21:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Yottie. Rathfelder (talk) 10:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have rewritten it, and replacd it with a short intro, and plot section. Still needs references, but should be borderline keepable now...--Eptalon (talk) 21:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Actually redirect/merge to Blood Brothers... Eptalon (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Provisional Government of the Republic of Poland[change source]
- Provisional Government of the Republic of Poland (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The government isnt the army Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete Bad redirect.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree, non controversial - incorrect redirect. Yottie =talk= 21:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Adolf Hitler Uunona[change source]
- Adolf Hitler Uunona (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of any notability, The AFD at EN (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Uunona) says it better than I ever could, Fails en:WP:BLP1E, en:WP:NPOL and WP:GNG, –Davey2010Talk 14:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - Agree, not notable. Yottie =talk= 21:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This is the third time we had this request. (see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Adolf H. Uunona and Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Adolf Hitler Uunona.) The keep reason for the 2021 request is valid. – Angerxiety! 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Angerxiety Many thanks for making me aware of those, I don't check talkpages prior to nominating so had no idea those existed (had this been titled "3rd Nomination" then I would've withdrawn),
- That all being said he's only notable for the name - not for being a notable politician. I don't see how having a name like his should make one notable for an article, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Yahya Ekhou[change source]
- Yahya Ekhou (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Twice deleted under A4 - thought I'd do an RFD to make it official - no evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 15:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete, but a weak delete. Sources are iffy - interviews, connected groups, small NGO's. The awards seem the same, none of them really notable. With the persistence here and on en for this person, there's a feeling of COI editing as well. Also noting that there's a draft on EN for this article and the same text was declined by an AFC reviewer [13], with a fair number of comments from prior reviewers. Ravensfire (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- He is now a member of the board of directors of this organization, which is confirmed by the presence of an article on the organization’s website.
- As for the fact that the organization is small, this does not negate its influence and effectiveness.
- I attached the link to the organization on Wikipedia:
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A4kulare_Fl%C3%BCchtlingshilfe
- As for his Mauritanian organization, it is small but the only one active for the freedom of minorities in a country unknown to the media.
- https://liberals-mauritania.org/ Hammer-Sabrine (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hammer, You may want to read en:WP:COI and en:WP:Paid editing, Your investment in this and other articles makes me believe this is anything but a new editor trying to create good articles. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 19:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just being the member of a board of directors of an organization does not make one notable. I was on a board for a while of a local non-profit group for youth sports, and I assure you I'm not notable. You need to read the WP:GNG and WP:NBIO pages, in addition to the ones Davey2010 linked. Ravensfire (talk) 21:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable. --Yottie =talk= 19:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Category:Australian male handball players[change source]
- Category:Australian male handball players (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:CATGENDER says that gender-specific categories should be avoided. I don't see this one as needing an exception. Auntof6 (talk) 22:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Keep I thought sport was one of the areas where categorising by gender was unavoidable, per point 3 of WP:CATGENDER. --Ferien (talk) 22:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- It says "in some cases". I don't think all sports cases require the separation. -- Auntof6 (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: - Category American Handball players litsts both men and women in the same category, so does Category:Brazililan handball players. Spanish handball players has two categories, one for men, the other for women, and the Olympic handball players for Spain, where both are again in the same cantegory (as trhere are only 4); the Spanish male/female handball players only have two articles each...--Eptalon (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep per Ferien and per en:Category:Australian male handball players, If it exists on EN I don't see why it can't exist here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)- Existing on enwiki is not a reason to keep it here. When we discussed and added WP:CATGENDER, we knew it was different from enwiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete per my reply at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Category:Australian female handball players, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Again struck per the link. –Davey2010Talk 19:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Request to closing administrator If this RfD closes as delete, which it appears it is going to at this stage, please also treat Category:Spanish male handball players that is a near identical case to this as a G7 and merge the categories in the same way. Thanks in advance. --Ferien (talk) 20:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merge - I think given the numbers, it would make more sense to categorise irrespective of gender, as in Australian handball players (or Spanish handball players for that matter). --Yottie =talk= 21:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete We had many discussions, which resulted in our CATGENDER guideline above. In the interest of treatimg all sportspeople the same way, I think we should do away with the split into male and female handball players. This means that we delete this category, and merge its entries into the parent (Australian handball players). --Eptalon (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Category:Australian female handball players[change source]
- Category:Australian female handball players (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:CATGENDER says that gender-specific categories should be avoided. I don't see this one as needing an exception. Auntof6 (talk) 22:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Keep I thought sport was one of the areas where categorising by gender was unavoidable, per point 3 of WP:CATGENDER. --Ferien (talk) 22:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- It says "in some cases". I don't think all sports cases require the separation. -- Auntof6 (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: -Same comment as the Australian male handball players above: depending on where you look there is no split into male/female, or there is one, but only if there are enough entries (more than 2) for a new category. It's inconsistent to say that in the case of the Brazililian ones we don't split, but in the case of another nation we do split. Also, as is, there are many cases, where we don't have enough entries for a category.--Eptalon (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep per Ferien and per en:Category:Australian female handball players, If it exists on EN I don't see why it can't exist here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)- Existing on enwiki is not a reason to keep it here. When we discussed and added WP:CATGENDER, we knew it was different from enwiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Well it is when we pretty much follow everything EN does - article existence up until recently had always been on the basis of "if it exists there, it exists here" although sure this year that's gradually changed, Anyway I see more benefits to having gender-based categories than I do disadvantages to be honest but even if the EN category didn't exist I still would've !voted Keep anyway. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)- It had not always been that way. That's a convenient rule of thumb people sometimes follow, but it has never been a policy or guideline. We have quite a few articles that enwiki doesn't. But this discussion is about categories, not articles. Our category structure is different from enwiki's in many ways; this is just one of them, and it's one where the decision was deliberate. The issue here should be: should these categories be an exception to our guideline and, if so, why? -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I agree there and it's a rule of thumb for me too unfortunately, I'll be honest I thought the system was generally the same although obviously no where near as many due to population etc,- Regarding your last point en does have en:Category:Canadian LGBT soccer players as an example however delving into all of that leads to complex categories and goes against the point of Simple so I guess actually it would make more sense to remove genders as that way LGBT or non binary gender-fluid and others can be created and then categorised as opposed to essentially those articles being orphans,
Yeah I think because of the complexity of the categories it would make more sense to move all to Category:Australian handball players so Delete for that reason, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)- In general we have excluded LGBT/non-binary, there are just too few cases, and if we don't split for male/female, what's the point in splitting for LGBT/non-binary? Eptalon (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
I thought it would make more sense to have all players in one category as opposed male, female, LGBT etc etc, I'll be honest I don't know if there are any LGBT handball players but I thought if there was then they could sort of be better categorised ?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)- Have since found out Category:LGBT sportspeople exists as does Category:LGBT people by identity so that makes my entire rationale moot. Not sure why I assumed neither existed but heyho. –Davey2010Talk 19:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- In general we have excluded LGBT/non-binary, there are just too few cases, and if we don't split for male/female, what's the point in splitting for LGBT/non-binary? Eptalon (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- It had not always been that way. That's a convenient rule of thumb people sometimes follow, but it has never been a policy or guideline. We have quite a few articles that enwiki doesn't. But this discussion is about categories, not articles. Our category structure is different from enwiki's in many ways; this is just one of them, and it's one where the decision was deliberate. The issue here should be: should these categories be an exception to our guideline and, if so, why? -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Existing on enwiki is not a reason to keep it here. When we discussed and added WP:CATGENDER, we knew it was different from enwiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Request to closing administrator If this RfD closes as delete, which it appears it is going to at this stage, please also treat Category:Spanish female handball players that is a near identical case to this as a G7 and merge the categories in the same way. Thanks in advance. --Ferien (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will restate it here too: I think this category should be deleted, and its content merged into the parent. We had long discussions, which resulted in our CATGENDER guideline. It makes no sense to classify by gender. So delete --Eptalon (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Request to closing administrator Sorry, I just saw this as I was busy with my finals. By the way, I don't have any objections to anything. It can be kept or deleted as there are discussions above, but from my perspective, I believe it should be kept as it won't harm us by having new categories since we don't have enough here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DIVINE (talk • contribs) 13:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- In what sense do we not have enough categories? -- Auntof6 (talk) 11:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. - G5'd by Macdonald-ross. –Davey2010Talk 16:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Gabrielle Nevaeh Green[change source]
- Gabrielle Nevaeh Green (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Young actress (aged 19), seems to have stared in sometv shows. When I search for the name though, I mostly find social media. So the big question: does this person meet the inclusion criteria for our wiki? Eptalon (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Weak keep as per , She's been in 30 episodes in 2 different programmes so would say she meets NACTOR and en:WP:BASIC by a bare minimum, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tagged as QD G5. –Davey2010Talk 22:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete Has been deleted at least twice so falls under G4. MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 21:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @MCGAMER YOUTUBE Both deletions were QD criteria and G4 requires an RfD deletion to be valid.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands national football team (2nd nomination)[change source]
- South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands national football team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As far as I recall, the population of the island are two people (with their partners), so four people. There's one or two people employed by the local museum, all in Grytviken, the main settlement. In addition, seasonally, we get about 25 people working for the British Antarctic Survey. With all these people, we likely get one or two football teams (that needs references), so should we keep or delete this article? Eptalon (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - The equivalent page on ENWP redirects to Falkland Islands official football team, which doesn't exist here. I agree, not worthy of an article of its own. Yottie =talk= 16:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Yotta Eg[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of notability Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - To be honest, I think it meets QD-A4. Yottie =talk= 21:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Close A1'd by fr33kman.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 05:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Wasurenai Hibi[change source]
- Wasurenai Hibi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't get where anything related to this redirect is talked about in the article Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 09:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - To be honest, there is a whole list here that needs looking at. Most are not the correct use of the redirect function. Yottie =talk= 21:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD, content available in Simple English Wiktionary MathXplore (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Reacts[change source]
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete per WP:DICTIONARY and also a terrible title. Reacts could mean a whole lot of things other than chemical reactions as well Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 09:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's better to put votes in the Discussion section rather than replying to nom's comment.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- delete - If we are talking about reactions in general, we likely need a disambiguation page; if we are talking about chemical reactions, I also guess there'll be different types. Plus, using a contraction isn't helpful either...--Eptalon (talk) 16:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so this term belongs in the Simple Wiktionary. Cyclonial (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:DICTIONARY.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - as per above. We already have a disambig page for reaction and a page for chemical reaction. Yottie =talk= 21:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Reaction I don't see a reason why we couldn't be using the reaction disambiguation page that already exists. This page covers multiple different reactions, that doesn't only include chemical ones. Redirects are cheap, and this redirect would be appropriate. --Ferien (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 07:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 05:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Scott Yager[change source]
- Scott Yager (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Michaelglassy has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG Not notable, Having paid press Michaelglassy (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Administrator note: This RfD was not properly transcluded to WP:RfD. I have reset the deadline for closure.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - A agree, I could find no proof of notability. Yottie =talk= 21:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) 22:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 05:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Names for ordinal numbers[change source]
- Names for ordinal numbers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Kai Burghardt has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: In its current form the article is an English textbook or dictionary entry. Kai Burghardt (talk) 04:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Administrator note: This RfD was not properly transcluded to WP:RfD. I have reset the deadline for closure.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unencyclopedic.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 04:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC) 22:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. No objections to RFD MathXplore (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Hoshizora no Live: The Best of Acoustic Ballade[change source]
- Hoshizora no Live: The Best of Acoustic Ballade (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Redirect makes no sense Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - As per my comment on the discussion about Wasurenai Hibi, there is a list of pages that are incorrect use of the redirect function. Yottie =talk= 21:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. I deleted the category, including its two children, the pages have been moved up the hierarchy (To: Politicians from NSW, and Sportspoeople from NSW).--Eptalon (talk) 13:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:People from Newcastle, New South Wales by occupation[change source]
- Category:People from Newcastle, New South Wales by occupation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: With the number of different occupations, even if we did fill this up, I don't see a point in having a whole category "by occupation" for this city. Cleanup as part of User:Ferien/TBA/P3. --Ferien (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- If we merged the two subcategories (Sportspeople from ..., Politicians from ...) into this one, we get a category with 4 entries (and can delete the subcategories Sportspeople...,Politicians...). The other way is to find another Sportsperson, politician, and other notable person for each of the three categories, so that we have the minimum 3 entreies, our guidleine requires.--Eptalon (talk) 14:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Eptalon, "by occupation" categories such as these are intended to be parent categories, in that they only contain subcategories. If the subcategories were deleted and the contents moved, then they wouldn't be sorted by occupation, so they'd just go into Category:People from Newcastle, New South Wales, leaving this category empty. --Ferien (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- In that case: find another sportsperson and another politician, do away with this intermediate category (which only has two entrires) Eptalon (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Eptalon, "by occupation" categories such as these are intended to be parent categories, in that they only contain subcategories. If the subcategories were deleted and the contents moved, then they wouldn't be sorted by occupation, so they'd just go into Category:People from Newcastle, New South Wales, leaving this category empty. --Ferien (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I tend to agree with the nomination, it seems of little use. Delete. Yottie =talk= 22:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Mai Ekhou[change source]
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A4 was declined - Non notable filmmaker, Other than this I cannot find any evidence of any notability, Google News brings up 0 results, Fails en:WP:FILMMAKER and GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete, as the subject does not meet the notability guidelines. Surprisingly few search results for a person who wants to promote herself. Kk.urban (talk) 22:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- "keep" Please review the deletion process because the page talks about a famous filmmaker, and I have included many links that prove this. Hammer-Sabrine (talk) 19:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, None of her awards are notable and the sources are mediocre at best
- ecranbenin is a blog,
- luxorafricanfilmfestival tells you the film exists nothing more,
- africanwomenincinema is a blog,
- euromedwomen doesn't even mention the BLP subject,
- sadanatoualharf mentions a "Mai Mostafa" and appears to be sponsored/paid for,
- I would say saharamedias is fine although again mentions a Mai Mostafa).
- In short I'm less than impressed with the sources thus far and if anything it proves the point that she's non notable. Also the last 2 cites would fall foul of en:WP:BLPPRIVACY if that is her real last name. –Davey2010Talk 00:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey,
- - i have added the full name
- - I have now added a list of references.
- Best regards Hammer-Sabrine (talk) 19:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2 news pieces are fine, the rest are mentions/sponsored/404s, still no evidence of any notability, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, None of her awards are notable and the sources are mediocre at best
- Delete Concur with the analysis from Kk.urban and Davey2010. Article is promotional in tone, not supported by good sources and does not show how this person is notable. Ravensfire (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable. Yottie =talk= 22:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Love Ghost (band)[change source]
- Love Ghost (band) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable band, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails en:WP:NMUSIC and GNG, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - I couldn't find any compelling evidence that the band is notable. Yottie =talk= 22:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
The Pocket Queen[change source]
- The Pocket Queen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable musician, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NMUSIC and GNG –Davey2010Talk 17:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - I agree, no compelling evidence the subject is notable. Yottie =talk= 22:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Related pages[change source]
- All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
- Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
- Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy
- Wikipedia:Quick deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
- Category:Deletion requests
- Category:Quick deletion requests