User talk:Chenzw/Archives/Jan 2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chenzw/Archives/Jan_2016.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw.


Filling in bare references[change source]

Hi, Chenzw. I noticed this edit. When I did something similar, TDKR undid it. He said that when one of those list of deaths pages gets full, having the full citation templates makes it take too long to load the page. I don't know how much of a problem it really is, but on those pages they don't use the templates. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2016[change source]

Hey Chenzw thanks for your help! But in the article Deaths in 2016 it is a requirement that all references must be in [http:www//] format rather than the completed cite web. According to the English Wikipedia it will prevent the article from loading too much. Remember that there might be over 100 deaths in this article for January alone! If your confused check out Deaths in November 2015. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you undelete this article and userfy it to my User:Nepaxt/B sandbox, please? I need the article for a user. Thank you. //nepaxt 02:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will not undelete the article. I will email you with more details. Chenzw  Talk  03:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please at least provide the content of the deleted page? My brother was not attempting to blatanty self-promote himself, but rather just write a short sentence or two about himself, which yo my knoweledge is acceptable on a personal user page. WikiInternetWeb (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiInternetWeb: I have restored it to User:Ййпбшпсрлщевм/Вфйаодхъ. In the interests of readability and accessibility for other readers and editors on this wiki, please also translate the contents to English. Chenzw  Talk  03:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Thanks. WikiInternetWeb (talk) 03:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 January 2016[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Incorrect edit?[change source]

Your bot tagged a page that I created for deletion when it was not vandalism. Its a perfectly good article about the Power Mac G5. Ipadguy (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot[change source]

Your bot did a false revert, and Added an Incorrect warning to a user.

I do belive the bot should get a little bit of a fix, I've already Reverted the bot edit, but didn't remove the warning. SleepyMode (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added that particular edit to the training database. The bot works by "learning" from the different features in each edit (eg. number of words added, ratio of punctuation added). Every new report (be it false positive or false negative) will allow it to become more accurate. Thanks for reporting this! Chenzw  Talk  16:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pokémon directory[change source]

Hi, Chenzw. I was looking through the unused templates to see if there were any we could delete, and I came across Template:Pokémon directory. You created this in June 2008. It seems like the main point of the template is the sublists, but they are all red links. Do you think we could delete this one? --Auntof6 (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it can be deleted. If I remember correctly, at that time, there were a few Pokemon-related RfDs, and I created the template then while trying to kickstart the addition of content on notable Pokemon. Looks like that effort has died down. Please feel free to put it up for RfD. Chenzw  Talk  11:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Template:Pokémon directory[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Template:Pokémon directory, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/Template:Pokémon directory and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 12:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

I disagree with your bot[change source]

I was editing the service animal page which appeared to me to have been hit with some self-promotional material regarding helper monkeys. That section had additional material not included for other animals, external links, and name dropping. I removed the excess and entered an explanation that that is what I was doing and why. I also accidentally removed a category heading which I went back to repair, but it had been automatically reverted.

There are a good number of errors on that page as well that I wanted to correct. I am an expert on service animals. I own and operate ServiceDogCentral.org. I also have a traumatic brain injury and a particular interest in this idea of having a simpler wikipedia available for people like me who struggle with reading and for my some of my autistic people who have a similar problem. I would like to correct these factual errors and have no intention of adding any links to my own website. I only want the information to be 1. accurate and 2. simple. I think my objectives are exactly inline with wikipedia's objectives for this page.

Stashkitty (talk) 18:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your report. I have added your edit to the bot's database. The bot works by "learning" from pre-classified edits to determine features which makes an edit vandalism (or not). The bot operates on a series of algorithms, and please be assured that it was not the intention to discriminate in any way when your edit was reverted. Chenzw  Talk  23:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I realize it was a mindless bot and that bots are necessary to deal with vandalism. I just wanted to be able to carry on with improving the page. Thanks! 173.31.200.28 (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Had to laugh....[change source]

An IP user created a new talk page on an existing article. The IP editor then put some gibberish on the page. Your bot tagged it for deletion. The standard form, when applied to a talk page, says: If you think this talk page should not be deleted, please add {{Wait}} below this message, and then say why on this talk page's talk page. (I then reverted the gibberish, added a comment to the talk page, and removed the qd tag since it no longer applied). Etamni | ✉   18:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed :D Chenzw  Talk  03:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one for the bot database[change source]

this edit from October was not reverted by human or bot; only found it when reviewing subsequent vandalism and was looking for stable version to revert back to. Etamni | ✉   10:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I have added it. If there's sufficient volume and quality of such train-able edits I may find some time to allow others to add these edits in by themselves. Chenzw  Talk  13:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that![change source]

I'm sorry about the Oscar Romero page i did not know what i was doing as i am new to Wikipedia i saw a mistake in the text and ended up deleting half of the writing. I'm very sorry. Also where can i find the sandbox? —This unsigned comment was added by 109.148.156.156 (talkchanges) 19:41, 14 January 2016 ‎ (UTC)

(talk page stalker) IP user's question about a sandbox has been answered on the user's talk page. Etamni | ✉   20:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 January 2016[change source]

17:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

missworking bot[change source]

The bot did cut out my added expression "Hi there, I am using whatsapp" on the Al-Qaeda:talk. How could that happen? In my opinion whatsapp is a very important fragment of the communicational globalization process. And finally a Wikipedia bot being a bot for a foreward-looking internet portal should not gag such important messages! —This unsigned comment was added by 91.2.41.113 (talkchanges) 14:38, 19 January 2016‎ (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The bot is working correctly. The talk page for the article is for discussing improvements to the article. While your opinion on the importance of any particular app may be shared by many, the fact that you are using it is not relevant in any way to improving the article. Some editors create accounts for use here, and having created an account, they may mention on the user page for that account that they use or like a particular app -- this would an ok place to mention something like this, although ultimately, even user pages are intended for improving the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not social media. Etamni | ✉   18:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) If you want people to contact you about your changes using WhatsApp, it's fine to put a link on your own user talk page. That's the only appropriate place for it. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to get an idea of where socks go when they disappear in the laundry! --Auntof6 (talk) 02:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

:D Chenzw  Talk  02:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 January 2016[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

16:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Abuse filter[change source]

Hey Chenzw, hope you're doing well. I'm not sure who manages the abuse filter here (I know there isn't edit filter managers), but this sort of edit should be getting at least warned and tagged, if not disallowed. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The abuse filter would be too specific and prone to false negatives in this case. I will let my anti-vandalism bot handle this instead. Previously the sandbox was on the bot's exclusion list. Chenzw  Talk  02:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, the abuse filter is possible here. I will try and get a rule written within the next few days. Chenzw  Talk  02:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Personally, I don't think that change was so terrible on the sandbox page. There have been worse changes there, IIRC. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
However, it seems that 166.216.130.0/24 is abusing the sandbox, over a few days already. The next time the IP makes the same type of edits, I am going to block that range. Chenzw  Talk  03:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]