User talk:Curtaintoad/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talkback[change source]

Hello, Curtaintoad. You have new messages at Pratyya Ghosh's talk page.
Message added 12:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pratyya (Hello!) 12:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Curtaintoad, Welcome to Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism! Thank you for joining to help make a difference. If you need help, check out the Talk page of our Wikiproject, or leave a message on my talk page. Anyway, Welcome! -- Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 18:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 18:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reversed my mind[change source]

[1] --Arctic Kangaroo () 06:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting[change source]

Hi, Curtaintoad. You've been doing a great job reverting vandalism lately! I just noticed that one of your reverts (this one) accidentally removed a {{Use British English}} template. No worries, I have put it back, but please be careful! Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 07:55, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curtaintoad! You want me to nominate you as admin? I also have a barnstar for you! --Aaqib Hola! 20:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
:) Nice work! Aaqib Hola! 20:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Aaqib. However, I might nominate myself for admin in a few years or so, once I have a few thousand changes and once I have been in a good mood here. I have only been here for around two months. ~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 22:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK! Take your time. --Aaqib Hola! 23:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith?[change source]

I must ask how you consider this edit to Pi good faith. In my opinion, it looked like obvious vandalism. I would just like to hear your reasoning, since you are more experienced than I on this wiki. TCN7JM 07:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like to me the IP did something wrong to the title of the section, but didn't mean to do that. The section on the page was broken. ~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 07:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While I disagree with that, as I don't think any user acting in good faith would type two Fs and then save the page without immediately reverting because they did it on accident, I can see where you're coming from. Thanks. TCN7JM 07:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what we would call a "good faith" edit, CT. A good faith edit is one that the editor thought was a good change to the article. This one was either vandalism or a mistake. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For my last day on Wikipedia, sorry for the disruption --Aaqib  13:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback is only for vandalism[change source]

See topic. -Bill — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.144.156.141 (talkcontribs) :... ~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 10:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I made a mistake. ~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 10:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Muling Buksan Ang Puso TV[change source]

I saw your warning to this user. What is this the name of? --Auntof6 (talk) 10:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Auntof6. At first I thought it was a TV company. But I just looked it up and I think it is a series. Is it still a violation though? --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 10:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure, but I don't think it would be considered promotional like the name of a company would. By the way, you don't need to leave me talkback. Most people here don't usually do that. When I leave a specific message for an editor, I watch their talk page so I can see when they answer. That yellow banner we get when we have a new message can be annoying when you're in the middle of some intensive editing, and I check the pages I'm watching periodically. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Thanks. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 10:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question[change source]

I'm curious: is there a particular reason you've been asking different people about becoming admins here? When I became an admin, I didn't think we really needed more, but am I missing something? --Auntof6 (talk) 11:03, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that people were allowed to ask other people to become admins here. But I should ask before making an RfA (if the answer is yes). If yes, then I should continue. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 06:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're certainly allowed! It just seemed like you had been asking quite a few people, and I just wondered about it. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Thanks anyway. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 06:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So, if you want, you could still satisfy my curiosity and tell me why. However, you certainly don't have to tell me, I was just curious. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curtaintoad! You probably noticed, but just letting you know that I had to move the history of Relays to the place where you pasted the content (Relay). Just so that we know who wrote it. Regards, Osiris (talk) 11:01, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osiris. Thank you for the move. ~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 11:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #69[change source]

Notable numbers[change source]

I noticed your comment at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/2003 FYI, it isn't the shortest numbers that get articles, it's the ones that have something interesting about them. The length of the number isn't relevant. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![change source]

Hello, Curtaintoad. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 13:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Pratyya (Hello!) 13:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Report me to the admins![change source]

Could you report me to the admins please?--94.197.217.89 (talk) 07:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you vandalize once more, you will be reported and blocked. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 07:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #70[change source]

Nelson Mandela GA[change source]

Hey. I've been working hard into making Nelson Mandela into a good article. Can you please read the article and then write your suggestions in the article's talk page. Thanks. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 04:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 17:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #71[change source]

Wikidata weekly summary #72[change source]

About this edit: I'm not going to speak for Osiris, but if you ever see something like that on my talk page, I would prefer you not reply unless you have something to contribute to the subject being discussed. We don't need to police each other's talk pages. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I will not do that anymore. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 08:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your change to WP:Vandalism in progress[change source]

The only objection I see with that user is that the user name is the name of an orgranization. That may violate our policies, but it is not vandalism. WP:Vandalism in progress is for vandalism only. Please report other kinds of things at WP:AN. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 08:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, they were (and still are) adding spam to their talk page in spambot fashion, which is fine for WP:VIP. Also, why was rollback used here? --Rschen7754 09:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, the rollback was my mistake. I was trying to click undo, but hit rollback instead. Curtaintoad's edits were not vandalism. As for the other user's edits, the only warning I saw from Curtaintoad was about the user name. There was nothing about other edits. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #73[change source]

The Signpost: 28 August 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Your recent revert activity[change source]

Could you explain these reverts that you did:

The edits you reverted don't look like problem edits to me. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted those changes because another one of the IP's contributions had vandalism on it as well as a warning from a rollbacker on the IP's talk page, so I thought that the contributions I reverted are possibly the same style. Also, when I looked through the difference between the two contributions on the on all of the three articles that I looked at from the IP, it was something related to categories and I noticed that the words of some categories were lowercase letters and thought it would affect the article and looked like vandalism.

BTW (please note), I used to contribute to WMF sites with Internet Explorer 9/10, now I am contributing with Google Chrome because there are problems with IE9/10; however GC is going much slower then what IE9/10 does, so I will probably be inactive for most of the time for now as well as issues with some of the buttons. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 06:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use of warning templates[change source]

Please refer to en:Wikipedia:WikiProject_user_warnings/Usage_and_layout#Levels. Level4im warnings are designed to be the only warning for vandals. Please refrain from using level 4im warnings unless absolutely necessary. Chenzw  Talk  10:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 September 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Wikidata weekly summary #74[change source]

Your recent comment[change source]

Hi Curtaintoad. Regarding your comment on the request for rollback page, it says that if you have rollback rights on other projects, you don't need the requirements here, which I have on en.wiki and Commons. I'll also may be a frequent vandal patroller here. So I will need rollback. Jianhui67 (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 September 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Wikidata weekly summary #75[change source]

The Signpost: 18 September 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Wikidata weekly summary #76[change source]

The Signpost: 25 September 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Wikidata weekly summary #77[change source]

Talkback[change source]

Hello, Curtaintoad. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 17:45, 3 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

78.26 (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #78[change source]

The Signpost: 02 October 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Possible sock puppets and only warnings[change source]

I see your report at WP:VIP about User:Southern Wear 604, and I see that you left a final warning on that user's talk page. I don't see the issues were, and I don't see what deserved a final warning without any previous warnings. If it was because of your suspicions that that user is a sock puppet, please explain why you think it is a sock. The page DWTL-TV started out as a bit of a mess, but that looks like formatting issues, not vandalism, and it was cleaned up. As far as I know, only people with certain rights have the tools to determine whether a user is a sock puppet. Even garden-variety admins don't have those tools. Please explain, because I am not willing to take any action without understanding the issues here. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other sock puppets of Christian2941 edited the page List of television stations in the Philippines (see history), and the edits were reverted and removed too. These edits were reverted because the other edits of sock puppet Christian2941 were reverted and removed, plus these socks have similar usernames and have been editing some of the same pages to before. There was another sock puppet which created their account a couple of weeks ago, Sanyo2038, which was blocked, and edits reverted from me. You may have not been here at the time or saw what happened. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 09:31, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 October 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

[change source]

Please upload al Logo for me, can you? Please, I'm sure you can.

The article is WikiMANNia and the logo is here: http://wikimannia.org/skins/common/images/wiki.png

Thank you! --77.0.184.118 (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: sorry. I searched it up on Wikimedia Commons just then but no notable results were found. Also, I'm not sure how to paste the above link (image) onto the page. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 09:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This file (http://wikimannia.org/skins/common/images/wiki.png) is to be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons! "To be uploaded", not "to be searched!
"wikimannia.org/skins/common" is NOT "Wikimedia Commons". "wikimannia" n.e. "wikimedia". --77.0.184.118 (talk) 21:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #79[change source]

QD reasons[change source]

Hi Curtaintoad. When you tag something for quick deletion, please make sure that you use a criterion from WP:QD. If the reason you use is not on there, then it probably can't be deleted under that reason. If it helps, try sticking to the list used by Twinkle. Osiris (talk) 10:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #80[change source]

The Signpost: 16 October 2013[change source]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia
TDKR Chicago 101 has given you some cookies! Now enjoy them!
WOW, thank you very much!! Just logged in and now you have made me cheer up! =p nomnomnomnomnomnom --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 23:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your qd requests[change source]

On several of your qd requests, you have put the word "unclean" in the comments. What do you mean by that? --Auntof6 (talk) 09:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When I see sentences that do not leave spaces after their comments, commas, full stops, etc. I may also add the word when I nominate an article for fast deletion if there are broken templates, links, and such. I have done this on other WMF projects too. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 09:46, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That does not make an article "unclean". Unclean articles are not eligible for quick deletion, anyway. Please see the deletion policy. Chenzw  Talk  09:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should change your "welcome" to equate with what you do[change source]

Can't say I feel "welcome". 141.218.36.59 (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:TP: you used your talk page incorrectly. --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 05:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]