Jump to content

User talk:Razorflame/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks

Hello, Razorflam. Thank you for welcome me here. I'll try to contribute some. Most of time I come over here to pick some articles and take them in my small wiki. I just read them and try to translate them in language, then I provide them in our wiki (sw:wiki). I was always afraid to contribute here for the sake of my less knowledge. But I'll try all the best I can... I hope u'll help me if I got problem...--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 14:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to help you if you are requiring help. Just let me know when you need help, and I will be happy to help you as best I can. Razorflame 14:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Razorflame. Nice to hear that if u'll help me at any moment. I'll try it...--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 05:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll help you any moment that I can whenever I am on. Razorflame 14:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poland

Has Benniguy moved? --Bärliner 16:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but looking at the actions of those IP addresses, I cannot be sure that they aren't him. Razorflame 16:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

US Cities

Thanks for your help, but I'm going through everything very thoroughly, and we've had some edit conflicts and I've had to fix some of your changes. I'd appreciate it if you would let me continue what I was doing. Thank you. · Tygrrr... 19:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I realized that as soon as I finished. That's why I stopped. Razorflame 19:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism?

"The term mud can also be affiliated with feces, particularly that of humans. If gathered together, and flattened, you can also have a mud pie." --Bärliner 21:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. Not sure though. Razorflame 21:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted to it in Mud pie --Bärliner 21:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If I did, I didn't mean to. I was trying to undo vandalism that was posted earlier in it. If I did revert to it, then I did it mistakenly. I am sorry. Razorflame 16:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abide with Me

"Probably a proper noun (if it is the name of a song)". Why not check where it should go before you moved it?--Bärliner 21:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I figured that it was a proper noun, but I was unawares of how to title songs. Now that I know how to title songs, I will title them correctly in the future. Thanks for letting me know. Razorflame 21:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Please note that not all pages created in the Image: namespace or pages about images created in the article namespace are image uploads, it's possible for an image to be at the commons, yet for someone to create a page about it here. All image uploads here can be found at Special:Log/upload. Cheers, Lights (talk) § 21:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you requiring of me? Razorflame 15:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for permissions

Hi Razorflame,

Would you mind explaining why you posted this onto meta:Requests for permissions? It seems to me that you have attempted to find a loophole in the system to gain adminship without an RfA. If that's true, that's really not acceptable at all.

Wikipedia is a community-based project, and we use the opinions of all editors to make decisions. Stewards are not a higher authority that can over-rule the community at your request, and the only way you will be promoted is by gaining community approval. Please do not attempt to bypass the rules again. Archer7 - talk 23:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't the case. I just wanted temporary adminship to deal with vandalism as nobody was on at the time, or if they were, they weren't dealing with the vandalism. That's why I posted it. Razorflame 15:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your imperfect understanding of policy

Please familiarize yourself with the policies here regarding userpages and deleting versus archiving. Archiving is clearly not mandatory, and saying that blanking one's own talkpage can be seen as vandalism is just plain wrong. The relevant policies can be found here. It says specifically, "Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. Please note, though, that the removal of good-faith warnings, even though permitted, is often frowned upon". Barliner quite rightly reverted your warning, but I have noticed you doing it to others. Please stop. Jeffpw (talk) 10:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the thing: It says that archiving is preferred. Razorflame 15:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, by all means continuing to represent the policy as something that it is not, if that's your inclination. But I will say right now that I have no intention of archiving my page, and will continue blanking it as I see fit. Any subsequent warnings, criticisms, etc. from you about this to me will simply be blanked on sight. Jeffpw (talk) 17:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying that you have to archive. If you want to blank instead, that's fine. You won't see me giving you anymore warnings or criticisms about this. Razorflame 17:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you are "Please archive your talk page instead of just deleting it." Your memory also seems imperfect --Bärliner 19:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On his talk page, I did. But I've already said that I won't post anything more to his talk page unless I need to (for other reasons, like asking him a question etc.) Razorflame 20:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Shemale

Hi Razorflame. I was about to write that article (Shemale), but I just couldn't to write it because page was already deleted by Elapton. So I can't persist to write such article, but I was so exciting to write it. I don't know which reason made Elapton to delete that article, maybe there was certain insultation which is not acceptable to society that's why admin decided to delete it. I want to rewrite it but in good order, will you let me to rewrite it?--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the reason for Eptalon deleting it:

06:09, 24 February 2007 Eptalon (Talk | changes) deleted "Shemale" ‎ (content was: 'A chick with a dick800px' (and the only contributor was 'Mythunderstick'))

If you would like to make this article for the Wikipedia, I would suggest asking Eptalon if you can make the page. Seeing as I am not an administrator on this site, I can't help you in this case, but if you were to take it up with Eptalon and convince him that you are wanting to make a good rewrite of that article, then I can see no reason why Eptalon won't let you create it. Razorflame 15:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions... I am going to tell him right now!!--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to get permission to write an article that has been deleted. Oysterguitarist 16:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know that, but I was just being cautious. Razorflame 16:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You must ask for permission, cause you can't know which reason made admin to delete an article. Permission (information) it's facilitate to make good communication (even to understand each other) with an admin. So we will continue to informing each other for everything leagally, thank you...--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 11:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muddyb: As Oysterguitarist said, you do not need permission. That is because he and the other admins (including me) will only delete an article which is against the rules. And I do not think you would want to create such an article. The article that was deleted did not try to explain "Shemale", it was just one line of rude words.--Bärliner 12:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re

See the bots userpage, you can find the operator there, and Archer7 has granted it the bot flag. Oysterguitarist 19:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know he did because I was the one who asked him over on IRC channel. Razorflame 19:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't do irc so I wouldn't know, and thanks for the barnstar. Oysterguitarist 19:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, sorry if my last comment sounded rude or arrogant. That wasn't how it was meant. And no problem for the barnstar.  :) Razorflame 19:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot flag

You bot now has a bot flag on vec.wikipedia.org. Semolo75 (talk) 19:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for letting me know so promptly! Thank you for your consideration and thank you for the bot flag! Razorflame 19:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What?

Please emphasize your QD reasons. What? doesn't usually qualify as grounds for deleting an article or page. --Gwib -(talk)- 21:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. It was actually meant to be a slight inside joke. I usually do emphasize my qd reasons better, that time, I just couldn't resist adding that to the qd template :) Razorflame 21:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

You deleted my work from minerals =| i worked on that on Microsoft word :( .

I am completely sorry. I thought that it was a copypaste from en:WP. I will go revert it immediately! Razorflame 22:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User-member since (Userbox)

Hello, Razorflame. I want to make my box which is going to show when I join here (This user has been on Wikipedia for 2 months and 4 days and so on). So please can you help me for that? I join here since 15 November 2007, you just make it if possible... With hopefully responses..--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this now if you would like. Razorflame 15:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Razorflame. Ooh my God, I just couldn't make it in my user-page, so please can you help me for this? Furthermore: I also need to see my name appear coloured like your name!! Can you also help for this? A two things are neede to be informed a) To provide code which is shown me when and how many days do I have here. b) To make my name looks coloured like you name!! Cheers.....--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 05:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For a), put this code on your userpage: {{User:Lights/Userboxes/User Wikipedian For|year=2007|month=11|day=15}} I'll change the dates to reflect when you joined. As for b), I would leave a message on Light's talk page, as he is much better at signatures than I am. Cheers. Razorflame 16:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting for reaction..--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 09:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. The A) it's ok, but B) not ok!! What do you consider about it.--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 07:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave a message on Light's user talk page for you informing him to contact you in order to help you get a signature. Razorflame 14:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little help

Hello! Could you please have a look here and then tell me if the template is closed? Because I see it open but I don't know if it's a mistake of mine in the code or it's my internet explorer that doesn't work... Katiusha (tell me) 20:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which template. There are two on the page one is OK--Bärliner 20:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The first, the one still written in Italian (the second, under the title useful notes is not yet a template) Katiusha (tell me) 20:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is I just fixed it :P--Bärliner 20:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for not answering this, Katiusha. I am currently very busy setting up a new Wiki that I founded and I have not been on here much, because of the amount of work that needs to be done there. I see Barliner has alreday helped you on this. If you would like to ask me a question, I would almost always reply to any email you sent me. Razorflame 21:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Artical minerals

I didn't know the websites on artical minerals was aloud :p thats why i deleted them

Runningblader 23:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are allowed because they are legitamite websites that have legitamite information. Razorflame 23:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok i am going to go off and work on a artical i am going to make Runningblader 23:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just make sure that you don't copy them off of the regular English Wikipedia. :) Razorflame 00:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page locked

My page is locked and i can not edit it. i have no idea why =\ Runningblader 00:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage was protected at your request by Oysterguitarist earlier today. Since you are not yet 4 days old, you will be unable to edit it until you reach 4 days of age. Razorflame 00:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nevermind. i found out why :P Runningblader 00:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

but it says on my pro i am 4 days old :P.

Runningblader 00:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to your earliest contribution, you are only 3 days old (You started on the 26th). Razorflame 00:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kalo

Warum Kalo interwiki Englisch geht es nicht --Penarc (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC) I ask you why the link is no good there --Penarc (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Que? Razorflame 00:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The link isn't good there because there is not an article on the English Wikipedia with that same name. Razorflame 14:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

templates

There will be a reason for them all because simple wikipedia is growing.

Runningblader 00:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But there isn't a reason for them at present. We will create them in the future when they are needed, but for now, they aren't. Razorflame 00:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok but i just saved a lot of work lol

Runningblader 00:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

How do i figure out how many day i been on wikipedia for??

Runningblader 00:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the earliest change you made by viewing your contributions. Just click on the "my changes" tab in the upper right hand corner. Then scroll to the bottom and click earliest. Then, scroll down to the bottom again, and the earliest change will say when it was made. That is when you joined. Then, you'll be able to figure it out quickly :) Razorflame 00:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

Barnstar Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar!

For creating countless articles on Simple English Wikipedia. Lights § talk 01:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mucho gracias, senor! Razorflame 01:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bored

Hi. I was bored today and cannot find anything to do at all even on wikipedia. I just asked if you wanted to "chat" or do something. -_- --§ Snake311 (T + C) 07:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to chat with me if you wish.  :) Razorflame 16:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

194.95.143.150

Why did you give 194.95.143.150 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) such a severe warning? (Terry) 20:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I gave it such a severe warning because it already had a test4 from earlier, and I believe that after looking at its contributions, that it is specifically attacking just one user. I would have to suspect that this type of behavior is reminescant of Freddy, so I gave him such a severe warning based on that. Razorflame 20:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I understand now. (Terry) 20:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homophobia

I thought I used simple words in it, but I guess they have to be simpler. I made changes. Let me know if you think it is okay now. If not, I would love some tips and guidance on what needs changed and why (to help me in the future). Thanks for your time, нмŵוτнτ 00:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the words you used were a bit too complex. Discrimination is a hard word (even if it is linked), and there were a few other words that were too complex, but you did a very good job on it. It is much better now. I have removed the complex tag from the article, as there is no longer a need for it. Any other questions, feel free to ask me. Razorflame 00:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's a hard to find a synonym for discrimination, but thanks for helping me figure it out. I do have one question: are editors supposed to stick to simple English on talk pages, userpages, and AfD discussions too? нмŵוτнτ 00:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No. If you look at any of the discussion pages, you'll see that some people don't use Simple English on them. I personally don't use Simple English on any sort of discussion page, as it could dilute the meaning of what I am trying to say. Razorflame 00:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, oh... I've been dumbing down everything I'd said on here thus far. Thanks for letting me know. нмŵוτнτ 00:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you look on my userpage, you'll see that I am a native English speaker. Razorflame 00:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, well, I thought that maybe there was some rule about it, so that if readers who can't understand English so well want to read any page (even userpages), they can understand everything. Who knows what was going through my mind. Thanks again, нмŵוτнτ 01:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Razorflame. Stop do that. I my self I don't know fluently English Language, if you say that you'll make other people suffered for your native English. It's better to wite simple English for the sake of all people who participate in this wiki. Sorry for being beyond of topic.. Cheers.--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 09:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I now changed the word Descrimination to segregation. I think that is simple word than Descrimination!! What do you think?--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 09:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think that segregation is an even harder word to understand than Discrimination. Razorflame 14:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VIP

Don't forget to check block logs before reporting users to WP:VIP :-) Lights § talk 00:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what their block logs are like, I'm just posting what Drini has posted on IRC. Razorflame 00:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot flag on fr.wp

Your bot fr:user:Darkicebot has now its bot flag on fr.wikipedia.org. Regards, Blinking Spirit (talk) 16:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for notifying me so promptly about this.  :) Cheers, Razorflame 17:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pokémon

Why did you edit the catagory on the Pokémon template??? It should be on the article ONLY and not the template. (Terry) 20:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it to make it so that it doesn't automatically transclude it onto every single article that it is put on. That's what the Category: syntax is for. Razorflame 20:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

Hello, Razorflame. Can you tell me, the meaning of trivia? I need to it exactly, cause I use to see it but I don't know it's mean anymore.. But don't laugh at me.--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia is questions about things (in general). More specifically, trivia is questions about obscure things just for informations sake. (I hope I got this right!) I would ask a third party opinion about this as I am not sure of this (fairly certain, though).Razorflame 15:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. But your selfish. Why you didn't change my appearance colour of name? I now seeing yours are changed, won't you?--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RazorFlame, are you there?--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've already asked Lights to help you with that as soon as he gets back on. Please be patient and wait for him to come back on to get a new signature. Thanks, Razorflame 16:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your information. And don't get angry because I called selfish. I was just kidding (and even to make emphasisement on it) but please forgive me...--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't angry. I was just pointing out that I've already done all I can to help you in this particular instance. Please wait until you get a response from Lights. Razorflame 16:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot on ca.wp

Your bot ca:User:Darkicebot has now the bot flag on ca.wp. --Vriullop (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much for letting me know so promptly! I will run it some more when I get home. Ciao! Razorflame 16:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning users

Please don't warn IPs for edits done 3 days ago... it's pretty pointless, as the user in question has probably changed, and often users aren't warned by the reverter for a reason. Please leave it up to the reverter to warn in future. Thanks, Majorly (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmkay. Razorflame 20:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're still warning users you didn't revert. Why? Majorly (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the edit history, and found that they were vandalous edits. The one to Carbohydrate was very recent, and I checked the edit history twice before I warned the user. Razorflame 21:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You told me once not to warn people when other people had reverted the edits. Terry (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I told you not immediately after. I would usually wait to see if they would warn the user, then go and check the edits to see if they were indeed vandalism. Then, you can go ahead and warn the user :) Razorflame 21:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing tool

As I'm fairly new to the whole system of things here, I was wondering if there is an editing tool available for use aside from the popups. I attempted to import my monobook from the normal English wp, and it didn't work.Schlechter Wolf

Twinkle doesn't work on Simple English Wikipedia currently, so you'll have to make due with either popups or plain old undoing :) Razorflame 21:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info...guess I'll go tune up the popups as best I can ^_^. And about the Ville Mönkkönen article, I'm currently simplifying it. The Wolf Bark 21:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It appears as though that article was deleted. I would suggest that you simplify it before creating it here, otherwise it would get deleted as an encopypaste. Razorflame 14:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, it has not been deleted. I merely typed the article name incorrectly. Also, thanks for leaving me a list of warning templates. The Wolf Bark 21:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem! I saw that you were interested in reverting vandalism, so I thought that I would make it simpler for you by leaving you the list of the warning templates that we use here at the Simple English Wikipedia. Razorflame 14:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Hi! Many thanks for your message. I am naturally thankful for the suggestion, but I think I am probably most useful doing what I am doing now, i.e. contributing, especially to the music section. I am fairly irregular on the site: sometimes don't visit it for a whole week: it depends what I'm doing in the real world. Tonight happens to be free, other times might be 5 minutes while eating a sandwich during which I might spot a misprint. I imagine admin is quite time-consuming? Hikitsurisan (talk) 21:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have to be. You could always spot edit....but your activity would be a major factor as to if an RfA for you would be successful or not. I currently am on the brink of nomming you and not nomming you because of activity. If you were even a little more active than you are now, I would very much so consider you for a nomination for becoming an administrator. If you would like to go ahead, I will nominate you, but if you would not like to continue, then I will gladly drop the idea. Razorflame 21:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I have been giving the matter some thought but, on reflection, I would prefer not to become involved in this way. As real life commitments continue to be quite time-consuming I am happy to continue as I am, writing articles and improving existing ones. Yes, I've been quite active just these last few days since time permits at the moment (and I am spurred on by the idea of getting the article on Pipe Organ up to Very Good standard - hence at present mopping up red links). Thank you for considering and suggesting the possibility.

Do you happen to know whether there are any figures available to show how many people read/use Simple Wikipedia?Hikitsurisan (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could always check out Huji's statistics. Otherwise, just take a look at the recent changes to see how many users are actually active. Razorflame 14:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darkicebot on svwiki

Hi, a bureaucrat has now set the bot flag for your bot. /NH 01:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know this so promptly! I look forward to working with you more in the future! Thanks Razorflame 14:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need your support

Hello, Razorflame. In my local Wikipedia, there's nomination for new admin. In that nomination I eventually nominated to be an admin in that Wikipedia. So please, I need your support. If you'll accept it please open here for your support. With hopefully responses... Cheers...--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 08:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but it is up to your own individual Wikipedia to nominate you successfully for administrator. I cannot support you on sw Wikipedia, because I just joined today. You look like you don't need my support anyways; what with 2 support votes already. Just cross your fingers and hope you've made a big enough difference there that people will support you becoming an administrator there. Razorflame 14:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Even if you join up today, you can give me support in order to make me far. So please vote me. I know they can not refuse to make me an admin, but I want you to show as your caring of me. Please support me.....--RecorDprodUceR (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the individual circumstances about the sw Wikipedia, and the reasons for making you an administrator there, so therefore, I would not feel it appropriate for me to vote for you on the sw Wikipedia. Please understand my reasoning for this, I don't want to vote for you because of the reasons that I have posted just now. Razorflame 15:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD causes ceased to exist

Please modify your vote in accord to current changes to "keep" status, because I already removed all causes of your objections from both PIE articles nominated to deletion. For proof look here: Schleicher's fable, The king and the god. Both articles no longer are copied, they are now heavily reworded to be different from main English wiki. CBMIBM (talk) 10:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I cannot change my vote for this. I firmly believe that this article is not needed at the moment. Razorflame 14:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I made article now as simple as possible using Basic English vocabulary, according to Majorly hints, thus deletion reasons are now null and void, and too added context according to Tygrrr hint, thus please review your vote. Article is needed, because Proto-Indo-European language has wikilinks to both articles such as Schleicher's fable and The king and the god. CBMIBM (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I just cannot see the use of such articles to the Simple English Wikipedia at this time. I am sorry, but I cannot change my vote. Razorflame 19:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you insist on deletion, these both wikilinks should disapper from Proto-Indo-European language article after deleting both articles. CBMIBM (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They'll just be recreated, only better. Razorflame 19:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thus why you want them deleted instead of reedited? CBMIBM (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've already given you my viewpoints on this topic. I would like to request that you back off and stop posting messages to me on here. Thanks! Any further replies will be deleted. Razorflame 20:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archival of vandalism in progress

Hi Razorflame, I just noticed you archived the ViP page. I saw in that action an opportunity to bring up something that I think needs to be addressed: Frankly, you use that page too much. In December of 2007 and January of 2008, you account for something close to 90% of the ViP reports. The sheer number of them has increased the size of the standard archival period of 3 months to 1 month. I think it would be fair to say that you alone have tripled the amount of ViP reports made. I don't think I'm off too much by saying that about 75 - 90% of the reports you make on that page, do not need to happen. An single IP can usually not make enough changes in a short amount of time to make to warrant a ViP report and most times a block isn't even needed. You know that the admins watch the New Changes like hawks most of the time. We're not here to block as many trouble IPs as we can. A short term block is usually sufficient, no more than a day. There are no steps of punishment as you seem to think is the case from your conversation with Majorly. A admin can decide what the length of block should be very arbitrarily. There are no rules or guidelines. Blocks and page protections simply do not need to happen at the rate you think they should be. I think a lot of admins would be nervous voting for you in an RfA in the future because although we can clearly see you're very dedicated, we can't have you protecting every page that gets vandalized once and blocking IPs for weeks or months because some kids were fooling around. You're very dedicated and a good user; I'm just trying to steer you on the right path because it is clear you want to become an admin. -  BrownE34  talk  contribs  14:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would never block an account for longer than 24 hours unless it was a return vandal, and then, no more than 72 hours. As for page protection, since running my own Wiki, I've seen that there is little need for protecting pages unless it needs it because of a large amount of vandalism. As for the ViP, I will not use it as much now. Thanks for letting me know that I use that page too much. I hope that I can stop using it as much now. I hope this clears things up, Razorflame 14:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks a lot for the barnstars! I removed this image because I just didn't agree with it. I hope you don't mind Lights § talk 16:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC) with an amendment made by Razorflame 16:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on! There's still one more that me forgot the put in there :) Razorflame 16:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! Lights § talk 16:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You deserve it! Razorflame 16:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, thanks again! You can have six cookies.

Lights § talk 16:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookies! Yum! Chocolate chip is my favorite! (not really) I just hope that they are soft! I reduced the image size so that it didn't take up the whole page :)Razorflame 16:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How do I make cookies here? When are they given to? Inkpen2 (talk) 21:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Thanks. I reverted BONM Germany cos that is my next goal, not a request :) Thanks for the thought though. --Bärliner 16:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmkay. I couldn't get the message that I wanted to on there anyways, so I am kind of glad that you reverted it. Razorflame 16:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No rude messages in templates:)
Forget lights' cookies, try  :)
I didn't think that I left a rude message in a template. Anyways, what the heck is that supposed to be a picture of? Razorflame 16:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An elephant shaped German cookie of course...--Bärliner 19:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome! I never had German cookies before!  :) Razorflame 19:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English Wikiquotes

If I'm correct, I think Simple English Wikiquotes was deleted. нмŵוτнτ 17:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I only created an account there, I didn't really do much there. Razorflame 17:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

thank you for that picture on my talk page. It is very pretty. Should I give you one back? Show me around here.

No, you shouldn't give me one back, because I have already been welcomed. It has all of the links that you will need to get shown around the site. I would suggest you read all of the pages on the pretty picture that I've given you to help yourself learn more about this page. Razorflame 21:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you. What should i do now? What are you?
You should focus on making articles. As to your second question, I don't know what you are trying to ask of me. Please only ask me questions if they are serious questions. Please also sign your name after your post using four tildes ~~~~. Thanks Razorflame 21:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Making articles? I will do that. Would you like to know my interests? And by my second question, I meant what you do here? Sorry for my english not being so good. Thank you. And do you mean like this? Inkpen2 (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I mainly help clean up articles, add interwiki links, revert vandalism, and create articles; just your average user here on the Simple English Wikipedia. If you would like, you can definitely tell me your interests (if you really want me to know them), and I would also like to add that the Administrator's Noticeboard is only for issues that involve administrators. If you would like to make a general comment, please use the The Simple talk page in the future. Thanks, Razorflame 21:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Thank you also for asking about my interests. My interests are:
  • Washing Machines
  • Telephones
  • Football
  • Computers
  • Hair
  • Skin
  • France
  • Europe
  • Spain
  • Italy
  • (Greece)
  • Germany
  • Japan
  • China
  • Korea
  • Asia
  • Insurance Policies
  • Violin
  • Flute
  • Piccolo
  • Oboe
  • Trumpet
  • Trombone
  • Lord of the Rings
  • Bass Drum
  • Toblerone
  • CDs
  • Honda
  • The space bar on the computer (i'ts my favourite one)
  • Cactuses
  • Germany
  • Vases
  • Printers
  • Maths
  • Calculators
  • Calculus
  • Solar cells
  • Cells
  • Prison Cells
  • Conserving Energy
  • Wasting fossil fuels
  • Formula 1
  • Global Warming
  • Japan
  • Wikipedia
  • Wikipedia 2
  • The number 4
  • The number blue
  • Chickens
  • The alphabet
  • Prime numbers
  • Rainbows
  • The rain
  • The pavement
  • Umbrellas
  • Horse riding
  • Horses
  • Ponies
  • Donkeys
  • Mules
  • Bunny rabbits
  • Rabbits
  • Bunnies
  • Hares
  • Hair
  • Foxtrot
  • Dancing
  • Music
  • Club music
  • Sulphur
  • Breast implants
  • Ingroing toenails
  • Contact lenses
  • Albinos
  • Siamese Twins
  • Pens
  • French nationalism
  • Hitler
  • Jews
  • Nazis
  • Racism
  • Concentration Camps
  • Rubber gloves
  • Cooking
  • Scouts

I hope this helps. This is a very long list. Is there anything you like on here that you can help me with that we have in common? Thank you. Thank you for reading this. Inkpen2 (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the countries, we could use a bit more help. We've already created all the articles possible that we could've created on the topics of Nazis, Hitler, and Jews. Such an interesting list. Very wide amount of topics. Razorflame 22:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sour

Why did you delete my name from the article I made about sour? Inkpen2 (talk) 22:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was me. You should not leave your signature after any article that you create, because you, in actuality, don't own the article; the article is owned by the site, so therefore, nobody can claim it as their own. I hope this helps. Razorflame 22:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok i understand it now. I thank you. Inkpen2 (talk) 22:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. I would also suggest typing in something different when you leave messages for other people on their talk pages. I would suggest actually typing in a comment before submitting your edit. Razorflame 22:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? Oh and thank you for reading the list above this writing. Is there anything we have in common that I can help you to work with? Inkpen2 (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of writing "This is a subject/etc..." write in the subject title what the actual topic that you are bringing up is. There is nothing that I am interested in that you are also interested in. Please read my userpage under the Biography section to find my interests. Razorflame 23:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok i understand it now. I thnk you. And I will check. I hope that there is at minimal one thing that I can help with. I do not want to edit alone. Inkpen2 (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes you have to edit alone. That way, you can learn more. You learn more through going for it and making mistakes than you do being guided through life. You should go ahead and take risks. BE BOLD!. Read the heading under this edit box. It says this: Don't be afraid to start or improve articles! If your changes are not perfect, they can always be fixed by other editors. I would suggest you just go for it, as other editors will always be there to help you through it, just not in such a hands on way. Please consider what I have said carefully. Razorflame 23:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Razorflame/Archive_10&oldid=1978458"